e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED] |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-11689
Fair Isaac Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
94-1499887
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
901 Marquette Avenue, Suite 3200
Minneapolis, Minnesota
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
55402-3232
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
612-758-5200
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Accelerated Filer þ
|
|
Non-Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
The
number of shares of common stock outstanding on July 31, 2010
was 41,710,784 (excluding
47,145,999 shares held by the Company as treasury stock).
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except par value data) |
|
Assets
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
112,612 |
|
|
$ |
178,157 |
|
Marketable securities available for sale, current portion |
|
|
129,173 |
|
|
|
139,673 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
107,804 |
|
|
|
101,742 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
22,223 |
|
|
|
22,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
371,812 |
|
|
|
442,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities available for sale, less current portion |
|
|
19,015 |
|
|
|
61,371 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
11,074 |
|
|
|
11,074 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
31,421 |
|
|
|
34,340 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
660,804 |
|
|
|
667,640 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
29,050 |
|
|
|
38,255 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
30,867 |
|
|
|
38,100 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
8,354 |
|
|
|
10,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,162,397 |
|
|
$ |
1,303,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
8,520 |
|
|
$ |
8,593 |
|
Accrued compensation and employee benefits |
|
|
31,421 |
|
|
|
28,139 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
35,459 |
|
|
|
38,183 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
45,234 |
|
|
|
39,673 |
|
Current maturities on long-term debt |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
128,634 |
|
|
|
114,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving line of credit |
|
|
245,000 |
|
|
|
295,000 |
|
Senior notes |
|
|
267,000 |
|
|
|
275,000 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
14,647 |
|
|
|
19,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
655,281 |
|
|
|
703,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock ($0.01 par value; 1,000 shares authorized; none issued
and outstanding) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock ($0.01 par value; 200,000 shares authorized, 88,857 shares
issued, 42,271 and 48,156 shares outstanding at June 30, 2010
and September 30, 2009, respectively) |
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
Paid-in-capital |
|
|
1,103,784 |
|
|
|
1,106,292 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost (46,586 and 40,701 shares at June 30, 2010
and September 30, 2009, respectively) |
|
|
(1,501,111 |
) |
|
|
(1,375,400 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
932,168 |
|
|
|
886,324 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(28,148 |
) |
|
|
(17,429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
507,116 |
|
|
|
600,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,162,397 |
|
|
$ |
1,303,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactional and maintenance |
|
$ |
115,902 |
|
|
$ |
119,534 |
|
|
$ |
344,709 |
|
|
$ |
362,646 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
25,541 |
|
|
|
28,400 |
|
|
|
75,704 |
|
|
|
87,792 |
|
License |
|
|
13,886 |
|
|
|
8,084 |
|
|
|
30,132 |
|
|
|
28,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
155,329 |
|
|
|
156,018 |
|
|
|
450,545 |
|
|
|
478,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues (1) |
|
|
45,316 |
|
|
|
48,160 |
|
|
|
132,476 |
|
|
|
160,655 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
19,176 |
|
|
|
18,364 |
|
|
|
57,403 |
|
|
|
55,409 |
|
Selling, general and administrative (1) |
|
|
57,077 |
|
|
|
50,290 |
|
|
|
165,977 |
|
|
|
157,519 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets (1) |
|
|
2,683 |
|
|
|
3,219 |
|
|
|
8,918 |
|
|
|
9,622 |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,711 |
|
Loss on sale of product line assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
124,252 |
|
|
|
122,789 |
|
|
|
364,774 |
|
|
|
394,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
31,077 |
|
|
|
33,229 |
|
|
|
85,771 |
|
|
|
83,904 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
3,836 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(5,462 |
) |
|
|
(6,086 |
) |
|
|
(16,293 |
) |
|
|
(19,771 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
1,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
26,709 |
|
|
|
28,582 |
|
|
|
72,264 |
|
|
|
69,620 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
8,771 |
|
|
|
10,443 |
|
|
|
23,648 |
|
|
|
21,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
17,938 |
|
|
|
18,139 |
|
|
|
48,616 |
|
|
|
48,357 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
17,938 |
|
|
$ |
18,139 |
|
|
$ |
48,616 |
|
|
$ |
47,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
44,446 |
|
|
|
48,835 |
|
|
|
46,171 |
|
|
|
48,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
44,885 |
|
|
|
48,986 |
|
|
|
46,561 |
|
|
|
48,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cost of revenues and selling, general and administrative expenses exclude the
amortization of intangible assets. See Note 2 to the accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements. |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par |
|
|
Paid-in- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
48,156 |
|
|
$ |
482 |
|
|
$ |
1,106,292 |
|
|
$ |
(1,375,400 |
) |
|
$ |
886,324 |
|
|
$ |
(17,429 |
) |
|
$ |
600,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(5,208 |
) |
|
|
8,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect from share-based
payment arrangements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,966 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,966 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(6,298 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139,465 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139,528 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of ESPP shares from
treasury |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock to
employees from
treasury |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(6,554 |
) |
|
|
4,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,772 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,772 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,616 |
|
|
$ |
48,616 |
|
Unrealized loss on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
(326 |
) |
Cumulative
translation
adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,393 |
) |
|
|
(10,393 |
) |
|
|
(10,393 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
42,271 |
|
|
$ |
423 |
|
|
$ |
1,103,784 |
|
|
$ |
(1,501,111 |
) |
|
$ |
932,168 |
|
|
$ |
(28,148 |
) |
|
$ |
507,116 |
|
|
$ |
37,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
48,616 |
|
|
$ |
47,994 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
23,762 |
|
|
|
29,052 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
13,235 |
|
|
|
15,342 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
3,660 |
|
Tax effect from share-based payment arrangements |
|
|
(3,966 |
) |
|
|
(7,297 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements |
|
|
(1,052 |
) |
|
|
(121 |
) |
Net amortization of premium on marketable securities |
|
|
1,668 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts, net |
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
499 |
|
Loss on sale of product line assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,993 |
|
Net loss on sales of property and equipment |
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of disposition effects: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(7,852 |
) |
|
|
35,251 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
925 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(864 |
) |
Accrued compensation and employee benefits |
|
|
3,453 |
|
|
|
(624 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
(10,390 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
3,516 |
|
|
|
7,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
84,025 |
|
|
|
124,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(12,746 |
) |
|
|
(11,283 |
) |
Cash proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash proceeds from sale of product line assets |
|
|
2,182 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Purchases of marketable securities |
|
|
(71,749 |
) |
|
|
(110,723 |
) |
Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities |
|
|
122,573 |
|
|
|
107,495 |
|
Distribution from cost method investees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities |
|
|
40,310 |
|
|
|
(12,211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on revolving line of credit |
|
|
(50,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuances of common stock under employee stock
option and purchase plans |
|
|
1,981 |
|
|
|
2,822 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(2,772 |
) |
|
|
(2,923 |
) |
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(137,497 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements |
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities |
|
|
(187,236 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(2,644 |
) |
|
|
(1,487 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(65,545 |
) |
|
|
110,668 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
178,157 |
|
|
|
129,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
|
$ |
112,612 |
|
|
$ |
240,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds |
|
$ |
13,374 |
|
|
$ |
20,910 |
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
20,519 |
|
|
$ |
24,861 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
1. Nature of Business
Fair Isaac Corporation
Incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware, Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) is a
provider of analytic, software and data management products and services that enable businesses to
automate, improve and connect decisions. FICO provides a range of analytical solutions, credit
scoring and credit account management products and services to banks, credit reporting agencies,
credit card processing agencies, insurers, retailers and healthcare organizations.
In these condensed consolidated financial statements, FICO is referred to as we, us, our, or
FICO.
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
We have prepared the accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial
statements in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and the applicable accounting guidance.
Consequently, we have not necessarily included in this Form 10-Q all information and footnotes
required for audited financial statements. In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited interim
condensed consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q reflect all adjustments (consisting
only of normal recurring adjustments, except as otherwise indicated) necessary for a fair
presentation of our financial position and results of operations. These unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with our audited
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended September 30, 2009. The interim financial information contained in this report is
not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other interim period or for the
entire fiscal year.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of FICO and its
subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. These estimates and assumptions include,
but are not limited to, assessing the following: the recoverability of accounts receivable,
goodwill and other intangible assets, software development costs and deferred tax assets; the
benefits related to uncertain tax positions, the determination of the fair value of share-based
compensation, the ability to estimate hours in connection with fixed-fee service contracts, the
ability to estimate transactional-based revenues for which actual transaction volumes have not yet
been received and the determination of whether fees are fixed or determinable and collection is
probable or reasonably assured.
Adoption of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance to amend
the disclosure requirements related to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The
guidance requires new disclosures on the transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1
(quoted prices in an active market for identical assets or liabilities) and Level 2 (significant
other observable inputs) of the fair value measurement hierarchy, including the reasons and the
timing of the transfers. Additionally, the guidance requires a roll forward of activities on
purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements of the assets and liabilities measured using
significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 fair value measurements). We adopted this guidance on
January 1, 2010, except for the disclosure on the roll forward activities for Level 3 fair value
measurements, which will become effective for us with the reporting period beginning October 1,
2011. Other than requiring additional disclosures, adoption of this new guidance does not have a
material impact on our financial statements.
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued two new accounting
standards that removed certain tangible products from the scope of software revenue recognition
guidance and altered the accounting for revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. The new
guidance narrows the definition of products subject to software accounting rules to exclude certain
tangible products that contain software and non-software elements that function together to deliver
the combined products essential functionality. As such, certain products that were previously
accounted for under the scope of software revenue recognition guidance will no longer be accounted
for as software. In addition, the guidance amended the accounting standards for multiple
deliverable
5
revenue arrangements to: (i) provide updated guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how
the deliverables in an arrangement should be separated, and how the consideration should be
allocated; (ii) require an entity to allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling
prices (ESP) of deliverables if a vendor does not have vendor-specific objective evidence of
selling price (VSOE) or third-party evidence of selling price (TPE); and (iii) eliminate the
use of the residual method and require an entity to allocate revenue using the relative selling
price method.
We elected to early adopt this accounting guidance and we have applied these standards to all
applicable revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified beginning October 1, 2009. The
adoption of these standards had an immaterial effect on our revenues, pre-tax income, net income
and earnings per share during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010.
When a sales arrangement contains multiple deliverables we allocate revenue to each
deliverable based on a selling price hierarchy. The selling price for a deliverable is based on
its VSOE if available, TPE if VSOE is not available, or ESP if neither VSOE nor TPE is available.
VSOE is generally limited to the price charged when the same or similar product is sold separately.
If a product or service is seldom sold separately, it is unlikely that we can determine VSOE for
the product or service. We define VSOE as a median price of recent standalone transactions that
are priced within a narrow range, as defined by us. TPE is determined based on the prices charged
by our competitors for a similar deliverable when sold separately. It may be difficult for us to
obtain sufficient information on competitor pricing to substantiate TPE and therefore we may not
always be able to use TPE.
When we are unable to establish selling price using VSOE or TPE, we use ESP in its allocation
of arrangement consideration. The objective of ESP is to determine the price at which we would
transact if the product or service were sold by us on a standalone basis. Our determination of
ESP involves weighting several factors based on the specific facts and circumstances of each
arrangement. The factors include, but are not limited to, geographies, market conditions, gross
margin objectives, pricing practices and controls and customer segment pricing strategies and the
product lifecycle. We analyze selling prices used in our allocation of arrangement consideration
on an annual basis, or more frequently if necessary. Selling prices will be analyzed more
frequently if a significant change in our business necessitates a more timely analysis or if we
experience significant variances in our selling prices.
Each deliverable within a multiple-deliverable revenue arrangement is accounted for as a
separate unit of accounting under the guidance if both of the following criteria are met: (i) the
delivered item or items have value to the customer on a standalone basis and (ii) for an
arrangement that includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item(s), delivery or
performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in our control. We
consider a deliverable to have standalone value if we sell this item separately or if the item is
sold by another vendor or could be resold by the customer. Further, our revenue arrangements
generally do not include a general right of return relative to delivered products. Revenue from
multiple element arrangements is allocated to the software and non-software deliverables based on
the relative selling prices of all of the deliverables in the arrangement using the hierarchy in
the new revenue accounting guidance. In circumstances where we cannot determine VSOE or TPE of the
selling price for all of the deliverables in the arrangement, including the software deliverable,
ESP is used for the purposes of performing this allocation.
We do not expect the adoption of this guidance will result in a change in our units of
accounting or in how we allocate arrangement consideration to our units of accounting. In
addition, we do not anticipate material changes in the pattern and timing of revenue recognition
nor do we expect a material effect on our condensed financial statements in periods subsequent to adoption.
However, the new guidance may facilitate our efforts to optimize our offerings due to better
alignment between the economics of an arrangement and the accounting. This may lead to engaging in
new go-to-market practices in the future. In particular, we expect that the new accounting
standards will enable us to better integrate products and services without VSOE into existing
offerings and solutions. As these go-to-market strategies evolve, we may modify pricing practices
in the future which could result in changes in selling prices, including both VSOE and ESP.
On October 1, 2009 we adopted new guidance on the accounting for business combinations. The
guidance states that business combinations will result in all assets and liabilities of an acquired
business being recorded at their fair values including contingent assets and liabilities. It also
requires the capitalization of in-process research and development at fair value and requires the
expensing of acquisition-related costs as incurred. This guidance has been applied to all
acquisitions contemplated subsequent to October 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued new accounting guidance on non-controlling interests in
consolidated financial statements. The guidance clarifies that a non-controlling or minority
interest in a subsidiary is considered an ownership interest and, accordingly, requires all
entities to report such interests in subsidiaries as equity in the consolidated financial
statements. We adopted this guidance on October 1, 2009. The adoption of this guidance had an
immaterial effect on our consolidated financial statements.
6
On October 1, 2009, we adopted the authoritative guidance on fair value measurement for
nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair
value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). Adoption of the new
guidance did not impact our consolidated financial statements.
On October 1, 2009, we adopted new accounting guidance for measuring liabilities at fair
value. This guidance clarifies that the quoted price for an identical liability is a Level 1
measurement when no adjustments to the quoted price are necessary. If quoted prices for identical
liabilities are not available, the guidance provides valuation techniques to be used in determining
the fair value of the liability. The adoption of this standard did not impact our consolidated
financial statements during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010.
In May 2008, the FASB issued new guidance on the accounting for convertible instruments that
may be settled in cash upon conversion. The guidance requires that proceeds from the issuance of
convertible debt instruments be allocated between debt (at a discount) and an equity component.
The debt discount is amortized over the period the convertible debt is expected to be outstanding
as additional non-cash interest expense. We adopted this guidance on October 1, 2009. The
guidance changed the accounting treatment for our Senior Convertible Notes, which were issued in
August 2003; however, the only retrospective adjustment to our financial statements is a
reclassification between equity accounts. The guidance does not require retrospective adoption if
the instruments were not outstanding during any of the periods presented in the annual financial
statements for the period of adoption, or if restatement would only lead to a reclassification
between its opening equity accounts for periods presented in the annual financial statements. As a
result, the adoption of this guidance did not impact our consolidated financial statements.
On October 1, 2009, we adopted new guidance to be used in determining the useful life of
intangible assets. The guidance amended the factors that should be considered in developing renewal
or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset. This
new guidance is intended to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset.
The adoption of this guidance did not affect our consolidated financial statements.
2. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
As discussed in Note 7, effective October 1, 2009, we completed an entity-wide reorganization,
which resulted in a change in our segments. Goodwill of $12.9 million previously attributable to
our former Professional Services segment was reassigned to our remaining segments based on the relative
fair values of those segments. In addition, goodwill of $54.9 million was reclassified from the
Applications segment to our Scores segment based on the relative fair value of our
business-to-consumer business. We completed an assessment of any potential goodwill impairment for
reporting units impacted by this new structure and determined that no impairment existed. The
following table summarizes changes to goodwill during fiscal 2010, both in total and as allocated
to our operating segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tools |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(previously |
|
|
Scores |
|
|
Analytical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy |
|
|
(previously |
|
|
Software |
|
|
Professional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machines) |
|
|
Scoring) |
|
|
Tools) |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
501,855 |
|
|
$ |
87,108 |
|
|
$ |
65,812 |
|
|
$ |
12,865 |
|
|
$ |
667,640 |
|
Segment reorganization (see note 7) |
|
|
(48,215 |
) |
|
|
59,540 |
|
|
|
1,540 |
|
|
|
(12,865 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(5,637 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,199 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,836 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
448,003 |
|
|
$ |
146,648 |
|
|
$ |
66,153 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
660,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense associated with our intangible assets, which has been reflected as a
separate operating expense caption within the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of
income, consisted of the following:
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
$ |
1,337 |
|
|
$ |
1,704 |
|
|
$ |
4,787 |
|
|
$ |
5,090 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
|
1,515 |
|
|
|
4,131 |
|
|
|
4,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,683 |
|
|
$ |
3,219 |
|
|
$ |
8,918 |
|
|
$ |
9,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues reflects our amortization of completed technology and selling, general and
administrative expenses reflects our amortization of other intangible assets. Intangible assets
(excluding goodwill) were $29.1 million and $38.3 million, net of accumulated amortization of
$105.5 million and $107.7 million, as of June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively.
Estimated future intangible asset amortization expense associated with intangible assets
existing at June 30, 2010, was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year |
|
|
|
|
Remainder of fiscal 2010 |
|
$ |
1,973 |
|
2011 |
|
|
7,658 |
|
2012 |
|
|
6,081 |
|
2013 |
|
|
4,094 |
|
2014 |
|
|
2,407 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
6,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
3. Restructuring Expenses
The following table summarizes our restructuring accruals for certain FICO facility closures.
The current portion and non-current portion is recorded in other accrued current liabilities and
other long-term liabilities, respectively, within the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheets. These balances are expected to be paid by fiscal 2018.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual at |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Accrual at |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Additions |
|
|
Payments |
|
|
Reversals |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Facilities charges |
|
$ |
3,771 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,631 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,140 |
|
Less: current portion |
|
|
(1,361 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(744 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current |
|
$ |
2,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no restructuring expenses incurred during the three and nine months ended June 30,
2010.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, in connection with our reengineering initiative, we
incurred net charges totaling $8.1 million consisting mainly of $5.9 million for severance costs
associated with the reduction of 255 positions throughout the Company and $2.6 million associated
with vacating excess leased space. In addition, we reversed $0.4 million of accrued expenses as a
result of a favorable lease termination agreement that we entered into for office space that was
previously vacated. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we recognized a $1.2 million charge
due to unfavorable sublease arrangements we entered into for office space previously vacated. The
charge was offset by a $0.4 million reduction in other restructuring liabilities. During the
quarter ended June 30, 2009 we reversed $0.2 million of accrued expenses as a result of a favorable
lease termination agreement. Cash payments for the severance costs were paid during fiscal 2009.
4. Sale of Product Line Assets
In June 2009, we sold the assets associated with our LiquidCredit® for Telecom
(LCT) and RoamEx® product lines. LCT and RoamEx solutions were included primarily in
our Applications segment. The LCT sale, which was for $3.5 million, included a $0.5
8
million receivable for post-closing working capital adjustments. The RoamEx sale, which was
for $2.7 million, included a $1.4 million escrow balance and a $0.3 million receivable for
post-closing working capital adjustments. All amounts included in escrow and applicable
post-closing working capital adjustments were received in fiscal 2010. Revenues attributable to
the LCT and RoamEx product lines were $5.0 million and $15.7 million during the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2009.
5. Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Property and equipment |
|
$ |
214,896 |
|
|
$ |
206,068 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(183,475 |
) |
|
|
(171,728 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,421 |
|
|
$ |
34,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Earnings Per Share
The following reconciles the numerators and denominators of basic and diluted earnings per
share (EPS):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per |
|
|
(In thousands, except per |
|
|
|
share data) |
|
|
share data) |
|
Numerator
for diluted and basic earnings per share
income from continuing operations: |
|
$ |
17,938 |
|
|
$ |
18,139 |
|
|
$ |
48,616 |
|
|
$ |
48,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average shares |
|
|
44,446 |
|
|
|
48,835 |
|
|
|
46,171 |
|
|
|
48,707 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities |
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average shares |
|
|
44,885 |
|
|
|
48,986 |
|
|
|
46,561 |
|
|
|
48,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share from continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The computation of diluted EPS for the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, excludes options
to purchase approximately 4,731,000 and 6,579,000 shares of common stock, respectively, and for the
nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, excludes options to purchase approximately 5,001,000 and
7,597,000 shares of common stock, respectively, because the options exercise prices exceeded the
average market price of our common stock in these periods and their inclusion would be
antidilutive.
7. Segment Information
Effective October 1, 2009, we implemented an organizational restructuring resulting in a
consolidation of our current operating segment structure from four segments to three. In addition,
we changed our segment operating income reporting measure to exclude certain corporate general and
administrative expenses. Previously, corporate expenses, which mainly include finance, legal and
human resource related expenses, were allocated to the segments. In addition, amortization expense
is no longer allocated to the individual segments. All periods presented have been restated to
reflect these changes. The new segments are as follows:
|
|
|
Applications. This segment includes the former Strategy Machine SolutionsTM
segment, excluding our myFICO® solutions for consumers, and associated
professional services. Our Applications products are pre-configured Decision Management
applications designed for a specific type of business problem or process, such as marketing,
account origination, customer management, fraud and insurance claims management. |
9
|
|
|
Scores. This segment includes our business-to-business scoring solutions, our
myFICO® solutions for consumers (previously included in the Strategy
MachineTM Solutions segment) and associated professional services. Our scoring
solutions give our clients access to analytics that can be easily integrated into their
transaction streams and decision-making processes. Our scoring solutions are distributed
through major credit reporting agencies, as well as services through which we provide our
scores to clients directly. |
|
|
|
|
Tools. This segment includes the former Analytic Software Tools segment and associated
professional services. The Tools segment is composed of software tools that clients can use
to create their own custom Decision Management applications. |
The former Professional Services segment, which represents delivery and integration services,
has been included within the applicable segment to which the services relate and is no longer its
own segment.
Our Chief Executive Officer evaluates segment financial performance based on segment revenues
and segment operating income. Segment operating expenses consist of direct and indirect costs
principally related to personnel, facilities, consulting, travel and depreciation. Indirect costs
are allocated to the segments generally based on relative segment revenues, fixed rates established
by management based upon estimated expense contribution levels and other assumptions that
management considers reasonable. We do not allocate share-based compensation expense,
restructuring expense, amortization expense, various corporate charges and certain other income and
expense measures to our segments. These income and expense items are not allocated because they
are not considered in evaluating the segments operating performance. Our Chief Executive Officer
does not evaluate the financial performance of each segment based on its respective assets or
capital expenditures; rather, depreciation amounts are allocated to the segments from their
internal cost centers as described above.
The following tables summarize segment information for the three and nine months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications |
|
|
Scores |
|
|
Tools |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Segment revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactional and maintenance |
|
$ |
62,939 |
|
|
$ |
46,153 |
|
|
$ |
6,810 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
115,902 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
21,500 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
3,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,541 |
|
License |
|
|
6,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenues |
|
|
91,430 |
|
|
|
46,505 |
|
|
|
17,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,329 |
|
Segment operating expense |
|
|
(68,003 |
) |
|
|
(15,907 |
) |
|
|
(15,409 |
) |
|
|
(18,397 |
) |
|
|
(117,716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income |
|
$ |
23,427 |
|
|
$ |
30,598 |
|
|
$ |
1,985 |
|
|
$ |
(18,397 |
) |
|
|
37,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated share-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,853 |
) |
Unallocated amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,683 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,077 |
|
Unallocated interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393 |
|
Unallocated interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,462 |
) |
Unallocated other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
$ |
3,753 |
|
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
$ |
540 |
|
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
4,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications |
|
|
Scores |
|
|
Tools |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Segment revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactional and maintenance |
|
$ |
67,991 |
|
|
$ |
44,832 |
|
|
$ |
6,711 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
119,534 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
24,077 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
3,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,400 |
|
License |
|
|
2,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenues |
|
|
94,559 |
|
|
|
45,304 |
|
|
|
16,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,018 |
|
Segment operating expense |
|
|
(65,298 |
) |
|
|
(12,914 |
) |
|
|
(14,294 |
) |
|
|
(19,614 |
) |
|
|
(112,120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income |
|
$ |
29,261 |
|
|
$ |
32,390 |
|
|
$ |
1,861 |
|
|
$ |
(19,614 |
) |
|
|
43,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated share-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,694 |
) |
Unallocated amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,219 |
) |
Unallocated restructuring expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237 |
|
Unallocated loss on sale of product line assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,993 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,229 |
|
Unallocated interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
936 |
|
Unallocated interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,086 |
) |
Unallocated other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
$ |
4,946 |
|
|
$ |
484 |
|
|
$ |
533 |
|
|
$ |
473 |
|
|
$ |
6,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications |
|
|
Scores |
|
|
Tools |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Segment revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactional and maintenance |
|
$ |
194,376 |
|
|
$ |
129,181 |
|
|
$ |
21,152 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
344,709 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
62,583 |
|
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
11,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,704 |
|
License |
|
|
14,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenues |
|
|
271,198 |
|
|
|
130,592 |
|
|
|
48,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450,545 |
|
Segment operating expense |
|
|
(201,525 |
) |
|
|
(45,386 |
) |
|
|
(43,298 |
) |
|
|
(52,412 |
) |
|
|
(342,621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income |
|
$ |
69,673 |
|
|
$ |
85,206 |
|
|
$ |
5,457 |
|
|
$ |
(52,412 |
) |
|
|
107,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated share-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,235 |
) |
Unallocated amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,918 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,771 |
|
Unallocated interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,439 |
|
Unallocated interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,293 |
) |
Unallocated other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
72,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
$ |
11,257 |
|
|
$ |
1,013 |
|
|
$ |
1,583 |
|
|
$ |
991 |
|
|
$ |
14,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications |
|
|
Scores |
|
|
Tools |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Segment revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactional and maintenance |
|
$ |
206,683 |
|
|
$ |
136,262 |
|
|
$ |
19,701 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
362,646 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
70,697 |
|
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
|
15,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,792 |
|
License |
|
|
11,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenues |
|
|
288,544 |
|
|
|
137,491 |
|
|
|
52,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
478,813 |
|
Segment operating expense |
|
|
(205,596 |
) |
|
|
(44,176 |
) |
|
|
(45,965 |
) |
|
|
(62,504 |
) |
|
|
(358,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income |
|
$ |
82,948 |
|
|
$ |
93,315 |
|
|
$ |
6,813 |
|
|
$ |
(62,504 |
) |
|
|
120,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated share-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,342 |
) |
Unallocated amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,622 |
) |
Unallocated restructuring expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,711 |
) |
Unallocated loss on sale of product line assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,993 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,904 |
|
Unallocated interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,836 |
|
Unallocated interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,771 |
) |
Unallocated other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
69,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
$ |
14,946 |
|
|
$ |
1,368 |
|
|
$ |
1,650 |
|
|
$ |
1,466 |
|
|
$ |
19,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Fair Value Measurements
In fiscal 2009, we adopted guidance for financial assets and liabilities and for non-financial
assets and liabilities that we recognize or disclose at fair value on a recurring basis (at least
annually). These include cash equivalents, available-for-sale marketable securities and our
derivative financial instruments. We adopted the remaining aspects of the fair value measurement
standard relative to nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value, but are
recognized and disclosed at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, prospectively effective October 1,
2009.
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to
transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The
accounting guidance establishes a three-level hierarchy for disclosure that is based on the extent
and level of judgment used to estimate the fair value of assets and liabilities.
|
|
|
Level 1 uses unadjusted quoted prices that are available in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities. Our Level 1 securities are comprised of money market
funds and certain equity securities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 uses inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are either
directly or indirectly observable through correlation with market data. These include
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for
identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and inputs to
valuation models or other pricing methodologies that do not require significant judgment
because the inputs used in the model, such as interest rates and volatility, can be
corroborated by readily observable market data. Our Level 2 securities are comprised of
U.S. government, municipal and corporate debt obligations that are generally held to
maturity. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 uses one or more significant inputs that are unobservable and supported by
little or no market activity, and that reflect the use of significant management
judgment. Level 3 assets and liabilities include those whose fair value measurements are
determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar valuation
techniques, and significant management judgment or estimation. We do not have any assets
or liabilities that are valued using inputs identified under a Level 3 hierarchy. |
12
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table represents financial assets that we measured at fair value on a recurring
basis at June 30, 2010 and September 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Instruments |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Fair Value as of |
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents (1) |
|
$ |
55,499 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
55,499 |
|
U.S. corporate debt (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,544 |
|
|
|
20,544 |
|
Non U.S. corporate debt (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,476 |
|
|
|
37,476 |
|
U.S. government obligations (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,783 |
|
|
|
64,783 |
|
Municipal obligations (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,453 |
|
|
|
21,453 |
|
Marketable securities (3) |
|
|
3,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
59,431 |
|
|
$ |
144,256 |
|
|
$ |
203,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Instruments |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Fair Value as of |
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents (1) |
|
$ |
113,468 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
113,468 |
|
U.S. corporate debt (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,697 |
|
|
|
11,697 |
|
Non U.S. corporate debt (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,977 |
|
|
|
38,977 |
|
U.S. government obligations (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,031 |
|
|
|
119,031 |
|
Municipal obligations (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,579 |
|
|
|
27,579 |
|
Marketable securities (3) |
|
|
3,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
117,228 |
|
|
$ |
197,284 |
|
|
$ |
314,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in cash and cash equivalents on our balance sheet at June 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2009. Not included in this table are cash deposits of $57.1 million and
$64.7 million at June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Included in marketable securities (short-term and long-term) on our balance sheet at
June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents securities held under a supplemental retirement and savings plan for certain
officers and senior management employees, which are distributed upon termination or
retirement of the employees. Included in long-term marketable securities on our balance
sheet at June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009. |
Where applicable, we use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities to
determine fair value. This pricing applies to our Level 1 investments. To the extent quoted
prices in active markets for assets or liabilities are not available, the valuation techniques used
to measure the fair values of our financial assets incorporate market inputs, which include
reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, benchmark yields, issuer spreads, benchmark securities and
other inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data. This methodology applies to
our Level 2 investments. The Company has not changed its valuation techniques in measuring the
fair value of any financial assets and liabilities during the period. During the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2010 there were no transfers of financial instruments between classification
levels.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
As previously discussed, we adopted the provisions of the fair value measurement accounting and
disclosure guidance related to non-financial assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair
value on a nonrecurring basis on October 1, 2009. Assets and liabilities subject to this new
guidance primarily include goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets measured at fair value
for impairment
13
assessments, long-lived assets measured at fair value for impairment assessments and
non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value in business combinations. The adoption
of this new guidance did not affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows for
the periods presented.
9. Derivative Financial Instruments
We use derivative instruments to manage risks caused by fluctuations in foreign exchange
rates. The primary objective of our derivative instruments is to protect the value of foreign
currency denominated accounts receivable and cash balances from the effects of volatility in
foreign exchange rates that might occur prior to conversion to their functional currency. We
principally utilize foreign currency forward contracts, which enable us to buy and sell foreign
currencies in the future at fixed exchange rates and economically offset changes in foreign
currency exchange rates. We routinely enter into contracts to offset exposures denominated in the
British pound, Euro and Canadian dollar.
Foreign currency denominated accounts receivable and cash balances are re-measured at foreign
currency rates in effect on the balance sheet date with the effects of changes in foreign currency
rates reported in other income, net. The forward contracts are not designated as hedges and are
marked to market through other income, net. Fair value changes in the forward contracts help
mitigate the changes in the value of the re-measured accounts receivable and cash balances
attributable to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The forward contracts are short-term
in nature and typically have average maturities at inception of less than three months.
The following table summarizes the fair value of our derivative instruments and their location
in the consolidated balance sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
Amount |
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
Amount |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
The following table summarizes our outstanding forward foreign currency contracts, by
currency at June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Contract Amount |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency |
|
US$ |
|
US$ |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Sell foreign currency: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian dollar (CAD) |
|
CAD |
1,125 |
|
|
$ |
1,065 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Euro (EUR) |
|
EUR |
5,680 |
|
|
|
6,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buy foreign currency: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
British pound (GBP) |
|
GBP |
3,473 |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Contract Amount |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency |
|
US$ |
|
US$ |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Sell foreign currency: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian dollar (CAD) |
|
CAD |
1,100 |
|
|
$ |
1,022 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Euro (EUR) |
|
EUR |
6,100 |
|
|
|
8,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
Japanese yen (JPY) |
|
JPY |
61,000 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buy foreign currency: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
British pound (GBP) |
|
GBP |
2,866 |
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
14
The forward foreign currency contracts were all entered into on June 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2009, respectively; therefore, the fair value was $0 on that date.
Gains (losses) on derivative financial instruments are recorded in our consolidated statements
of income as a component of other income, net. These amounts are shown for the quarter and nine
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
644 |
|
|
$ |
1,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
520 |
|
|
$ |
(1,254 |
) |
10. Income Taxes
Effective Tax Rate
Our effective tax rate was 32.8% and 36.5% during the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, and 32.7% and 30.5% during the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The provision for income taxes during interim quarterly reporting periods is based on
our estimates of the effective tax rates for the respective full fiscal year.
The effective tax rate in any quarter can be affected positively or negatively by adjustments
that are required to be reported in the specific quarter of resolution. The increase in our
effective tax rate year over year was due to changes in the foreign and domestic earnings mix and
the expiration of the Federal Research and Development credit.
The total unrecognized tax benefit for uncertain tax positions at June 30, 2010 is estimated
to be approximately $12.1 million compared to $18.6 million as of September 30, 2009. We recognize interest expense related to unrecognized tax
benefits and penalties as part of the provision for income taxes in our consolidated statements of
income. As of June 30, 2010, we have accrued interest of $1.1 million related to the unrecognized tax
benefits.
11. Revolving Line of Credit
We have a $600 million unsecured revolving line of credit with a syndicate of banks that
expires on October 20, 2011. Proceeds from the revolving line of credit can be used for working
capital and general corporate purposes and may also be used for the refinancing of existing debt,
acquisitions, and the repurchase of the Companys common stock. Interest on amounts borrowed under
the revolving line of credit is based on (i) a base rate, which is the greater of (a) the prime
rate and (b) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50% or (ii) LIBOR plus an applicable margin. The margin
on LIBOR borrowings ranges from 0.30% to 0.55% and is determined based on our consolidated leverage
ratio. In addition, we must pay utilization fees if borrowings and commitments under the revolving
line of credit exceed 50% of the total commitment, as well as facility fees. The revolving line of
credit contains certain restrictive covenants, including maintenance of consolidated leverage and
fixed charge coverage ratios. The revolving line of credit also contains covenants typical of
unsecured facilities. As of June 30, 2010, we were in compliance with all covenants under this
revolving line of credit and we had $245.0 million of borrowings outstanding at an interest rate of
0.8%. On July 14, 2010, we repaid all outstanding obligations under the revolving line of credit
using proceeds from the issuance of $245 million of Senior Notes in a private placement to a group
of institutional investors.
12. Senior Notes
In May 2008, we issued $275 million of Senior Notes in a private placement to a group of
institutional investors. The Senior Notes were issued in four series with maturities ranging from
5 to 10 years. The Senior Notes weighted average interest rate is 6.8% and the weighted average
maturity is 7.9 years. The Senior Notes are subject to certain restrictive covenants that are
substantially similar to those in the credit agreement for the revolving line of credit including
maintenance of consolidated leverage and fixed charge
15
coverage ratios. The purchase agreement for the Senior Notes also includes covenants typical
of unsecured facilities. As of June 30, 2010, we were in compliance with all covenants related to our Senior Notes.
13. Contingencies
We are in disputes with certain customers regarding amounts owed in connection with the sale
of certain of our products and services. We also have had claims asserted by former employees
relating to compensation and other employment matters. We are also involved in various other
claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe that none of these
aforementioned claims or actions will result in a material adverse impact to our consolidated
results of operations, liquidity or financial condition. However, the amount or range of any
potential liabilities associated with these claims and actions, if any, cannot be determined with
certainty. Set forth below are additional details concerning certain ongoing litigation.
Braun Consulting, Inc.
Braun (which we acquired in November 2004) was a defendant in a lawsuit filed on November 26,
2001, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 01 CV
10629) that alleges violations of federal securities laws in connection with Brauns initial public
offering in August 1999. This lawsuit is among approximately 300 coordinated putative class
actions against certain issuers, their officers and directors, and underwriters with respect to
such issuers initial public offerings. As successor-in-interest to Braun, we entered into a
Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement along with most of the other defendant issuers in this
coordinated litigation, where such issuers and their officers and directors would be dismissed with
prejudice, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including approval of the Court.
Under the terms of this Agreement, we would not pay any amount of the settlement. However, since
December 2006, certain procedural matters concerning the class status have been decided in the
district and appellate courts of the Second Circuit, ultimately determining that no class status
exists for the plaintiffs. Since there is no class status, there could be no agreement, thus the
District Court entered an order formally denying the motion for final approval of the settlement
agreement.
On April 2, 2009, a stipulation and agreement of settlement between the plaintiffs, issuer
defendants and underwriter defendants was submitted to the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York for preliminary approval. This settlement requires no financial
contribution from us. The Court granted the plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval and
preliminarily certified the settlement classes on June 10, 2009. The settlement fairness hearing
was held on September 10, 2009. The Court granted the plaintiffs motion for final approval of the
settlement and certified the settlement classes on October 5, 2009. The Court determined that the
settlement is fair to the class members, approved the settlement and dismissed, with prejudice, the
case against the Company and its individual defendants. Notices of appeal of the opinion granting
final approval have been filed. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and because the
settlement remains subject to appeal, the ultimate outcome of the matter is uncertain.
14. New Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In June 2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance related to the consolidation of variable
interest entities. The guidance requires revised evaluations of whether entities represent
variable interest entities, ongoing assessments of control over such entities, and additional
disclosures for variable interests. We are in the process of determining what effect, if any, the
adoption of this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.
15. Subsequent Events
For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, we have evaluated subsequent events for
potential recognition and disclosure through the date of this filing.
On July 14, 2010, we issued $245 million of Senior Notes in a private placement to a group of
institutional investors. The Senior Notes include a weighted average interest rate of 5.20% and a
weighted average maturity of 8 years. Proceeds from the Senior Notes were used to repay the entire
balance outstanding on our revolving line of credit. The Senior Notes were issued in four series as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series |
|
Amount |
|
Interest Rate |
|
Maturity Date |
E |
|
$60 million |
|
|
4.72 |
% |
|
July 14, 2016 |
F |
|
$72 million |
|
|
5.04 |
% |
|
July 14, 2017 |
G |
|
$28 million |
|
|
5.42 |
% |
|
July 14, 2019 |
H |
|
$85 million |
|
|
5.59 |
% |
|
July 14, 2020 |
16
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements contained in this Report that are not statements of historical fact should be
considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 (the Act). In addition, certain statements in our future filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), in press releases, and in oral and written statements
made by us or with our approval that are not statements of historical fact constitute
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Act. Examples of forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to: (i) projections of revenue, income or loss, earnings or loss per
share, the payment or nonpayment of dividends, capital structure and other statements concerning
future financial performance; (ii) statements of our plans and objectives by our management or
Board of Directors, including those relating to products or services; (iii) statements of
assumptions underlying such statements; (iv) statements regarding business relationships with
vendors, customers or collaborators; and (v) statements regarding products, their characteristics,
performance, sales potential or effect in the hands of customers. Words such as believes,
anticipates, expects, intends, targeted, should, potential, goals, strategy, and
similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive
means of identifying such statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties
that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in such statements. Factors that
could cause actual results to differ from those discussed in the forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to, those described in Part II, Item 1A Risk Factors, below. The
performance of our business and our securities may be adversely affected by these factors and by
other factors common to other businesses and investments, or to the general economy.
Forward-looking statements are qualified by some or all of these risk factors. Therefore, you
should consider these risk factors with caution and form your own critical and independent
conclusions about the likely effect of these risk factors on our future performance. Such
forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which statements are made, and we undertake
no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the
date on which such statement is made to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or
circumstances. Readers should carefully review the disclosures and the risk factors described in
this and other documents we file from time to time with the SEC, including our reports on Forms
10-Q and 8-K to be filed by the Company in fiscal 2010.
OVERVIEW
We are a leader in Decision Management (DM) solutions that enable businesses to automate,
improve and connect decisions to enhance business performance. Our predictive analytics, which
include the industry standard FICO® score, and our Decision Management systems power
billions of customer decisions each year. We help companies acquire customers more efficiently,
increase customer value, reduce fraud and credit losses, lower operating expenses and enter new
markets more profitably. Most leading banks and credit card issuers rely on our solutions, as do
many insurers, retailers, healthcare organizations, pharmaceutical companies and government
agencies. We also serve consumers through online services that enable people to purchase and
understand their FICO® scores, the standard measure in the United States of credit risk,
empowering them to manage their financial health.
Most of our revenues are derived from the sale of products and services within the banking
(including consumer credit) and insurance industries, and during the quarter ended June 30, 2010,
75% of our revenues were derived from within these industries. A significant portion of our
remaining revenues is derived from the healthcare and retail industries. Our clients utilize our
products and services to facilitate a variety of business processes, including customer marketing
and acquisition, account origination, credit and underwriting risk management, fraud loss
prevention and control, and client account and policyholder management. A significant portion of
our revenues is derived from transactional or unit-based software license fees, annual license fees
under long-term software license arrangements, transactional fees derived under scoring, network
service or internal hosted software arrangements, and annual software maintenance fees. The
recurrence of these revenues is, to a significant degree, dependent upon our clients continued
usage of our products and services in their business activities. The more significant activities
underlying the use of our products in these areas include: credit and debit card usage or active
account levels; lending acquisition, origination and customer management activity; and customer
acquisition, cross selling and retention programs. Approximately 75% and 77% of our revenues during
the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and 77% and 76% of our revenues for the
nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, were derived from maintenance or arrangements with
transactional or unit-based pricing. We also derive revenues from other sources which generally do
not recur and include, but are not limited to, perpetual or time-based licenses with upfront
payment terms and non-recurring professional service arrangements.
Our revenues derived from clients outside the United States have generally grown, and may in
the future grow, more rapidly than our revenues from domestic clients. International revenues
totaled $54.2 million and $47.0 million during the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
representing 35% and 30% of total consolidated revenues in each of these periods. International
revenues totaled
17
$152.6 million and $149.4 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
representing 34% and 31% of total consolidated revenues in each of these periods. We expect that
the percentage of our revenues derived from international clients will increase in the future,
subject to the impact of foreign currency fluctuations.
One measure used by management as an indicator of our business performance is the volume of
bookings achieved. We define a booking as estimated contractual revenues, including agreements with
perpetual, multi-year and annual terms. Bookings values may include: (i) estimates of variable fee
components such as hours to be incurred under new professional services arrangements and customer
account or transaction activity for agreements with transactional-based fee arrangements; (ii)
additional or expanded business from renewals of contracts; and (iii) to a lesser extent, previous
customers that have attrited and been resold only as a result of a significant sales effort.
Bookings for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Weighted - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bookings |
|
Bookings Over |
|
Average |
|
|
Bookings |
|
Yield* |
|
$1 million |
|
Term |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(months) |
Quarter ended June, 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
63.5 |
|
|
|
29.1 |
% |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended June, 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
49.0 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
% |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Bookings yield represents the percent of revenue recorded in the quarter the booking is
achieved. |
During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, we achieved bookings of $177.7 million,
including 35 deals with booking values of $1.0 million or more. In comparison, bookings in the nine
months ended June 30, 2009 were $148.2 million, including 27 deals with booking values of $1.0
million or more.
The weighted-average term of bookings achieved measures the average term over which the
bookings are expected to be recognized as revenue. As the weighted-average term increases, the
average amount of revenues expected to be realized in a quarter decreases, however, the
revenues are expected to be recognized over a longer period of time. As the weighted-average
term decreases, the average amount of revenues expected to be realized in a quarter increases,
however, the revenues are expected to be recognized over a shorter period of time.
Management regards the volume of bookings achieved, among other factors, as an important
indicator of future revenues, but they are not comparable to, nor should they be substituted for,
an analysis of our revenues, and they are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including
those described in Item 1A Risk Factors, concerning timing and contingencies affecting product
delivery and performance. Although many of our contracts have fixed noncancelable terms, some of
our contracts are terminable by the client on short notice. Accordingly, we do not believe it is
appropriate to characterize all of our bookings as backlog that will generate future revenue.
Reengineering Initiative
In January 2009, we completed additional actions under our reengineering initiative. These
actions were aimed at reducing costs through headcount reductions and facility consolidations.
With respect to the headcount reductions, we identified and eliminated 255 positions throughout the
company with an estimated annual cost savings of $30 million.
Current Business Environment
Throughout fiscal 2009 financial markets experienced significant volatility and general
economic conditions were unstable. These conditions had a substantial impact on our customers,
especially financial institutions. This included consolidations among our customers, a significant
decline in new account acquisition activities and extension of credit by financial institutions and
a general slowing of software purchases and related implementation services by our customers.
During fiscal 2010 certain aspects of our business, including revenue associated with our Scores
segment, have exhibited signs of stabilization. However, we continue to experience a long sales
cycle for our products, which has negatively impacted our license and services revenue. These
conditions are expected to continue to affect us through fiscal 2010.
18
As a result of this difficult business environment, we will continue to aggressively manage
our expenses in an effort to maintain solid earnings and cash flows. We also plan to continue to
invest in our Decision Management solutions as well as our core business operations.
Segment Information
Effective October 1, 2009, we implemented an organizational restructuring resulting in a
consolidation of our current reporting segment structure from four segments to three. The former
Professional Services segment, which represents delivery and integration services, is now included
within the applicable segment to which the services relate. Our current segment structure is as
follows:
|
|
|
Applications. This segment includes the Decision Management applications formerly
included within the Strategy Machine SolutionsTM segment, excluding our
myFICO® solutions for consumers, and associated professional services. |
|
|
|
|
Scores. This segment includes our business-to-business Scoring Solutions, our
myFICO® solutions for consumers (previously included in the Strategy
MachineTM Solutions segment) and associated professional services. |
|
|
|
|
Tools. This segment includes the Decision Management tools formerly included within the
Analytic Software Tools segment and associated professional services. |
Although we sell solutions and services into a large number of end user product and industry
markets, our reportable business segments reflect the primary method in which management organizes
and evaluates internal financial information to make operating decisions and assess performance.
Comparative segment revenues, operating income, and related financial information for the three and
nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are set forth in Note 7 to the accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements. All periods presented have been restated to reflect the
aforementioned changes.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Revenues
The following table sets forth certain summary information on a segment basis related to our
revenues for the fiscal periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
Percentage of Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Segment |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Applications |
|
$ |
91,430 |
|
|
$ |
94,559 |
|
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
61 |
% |
|
$ |
(3,129 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
Scores |
|
|
46,505 |
|
|
|
45,304 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Tools |
|
|
17,394 |
|
|
|
16,155 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
1,239 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
155,329 |
|
|
$ |
156,018 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
(689 |
) |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Percentage of Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Segment |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Applications |
|
$ |
271,198 |
|
|
$ |
288,544 |
|
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
$ |
(17,346 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
)% |
Scores |
|
|
130,592 |
|
|
|
137,491 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
(6,899 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
Tools |
|
|
48,755 |
|
|
|
52,778 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
(4,023 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
450,545 |
|
|
$ |
478,813 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
(28,268 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Quarter Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to Quarter Ended June 30, 2009 Revenues
Applications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Applications |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Transactional and
maintenance |
|
$ |
62,939 |
|
|
$ |
67,991 |
|
|
$ |
(5,052 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
)% |
Professional services |
|
|
21,500 |
|
|
|
24,077 |
|
|
|
(2,577 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
)% |
License |
|
|
6,991 |
|
|
|
2,491 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
181 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
91,430 |
|
|
$ |
94,559 |
|
|
|
(3,129 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications segment revenues decreased $3.1 million due to a $3.0 million decrease in
revenues from our customer management solutions, a $2.9 million decrease in revenues from our
originations solutions and a $0.5 million decrease in other application solutions. The revenue
decline was partially offset by a $2.2 million increase in our fraud solutions and a $1.1 increase
in our marketing solutions.
The decrease in customer management solutions was attributable to a
decrease in volumes associated with transactional-based agreements and a decline in professional
services revenue from software implementation services. The decrease in originations solutions was attributable to our June 2009 divestiture of our
Liquid Credit Service for Telecom product line, which accounted for $2.7 million of revenue in the
quarter ended June 30, 2009. The increase in our fraud solutions
revenues was attributable to an increase in volumes and new sales of our FICO Falcon®
Fraud Manager and to sales of a new product, FICO® Insurance Fraud Manager. The
increase in our marketing solutions revenues was attributable to sales of a new product,
FICO® Retail Action Manager.
Scores
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Scores |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Transactional and
maintenance |
|
$ |
46,153 |
|
|
$ |
44,832 |
|
|
$ |
1,321 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Professional services |
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
46,505 |
|
|
$ |
45,304 |
|
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scores segment revenues increased $1.2 million primarily due to an increase in our
myFICO® business-to-consumer services revenues and an increase in our business-to-business
scores revenues. The increase in our business-to-consumer services was primarily attributable to increased
transactional volumes with myFICO.com. The increase in business-to-business scores revenue was due
to a true-up of royalty fees with one of the reporting agencies partially offset by a decrease in
prescreen revenues due to a decline in volumes of prescreening initiatives by our customers. Excluding the true-up of royalty fees,
scores segment revenues would have decreased for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. We
expect weakness in the U.S. financial credit market will continue to adversely affect Scores segment
revenues in fiscal 2010.
During the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, revenues generated from our agreements with
Equifax, TransUnion and Experian collectively accounted for approximately 22% and 20%,
respectively, of our total revenues, including revenues from these customers that are recorded in
our other segments.
20
Tools
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Tools |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Transactional and
maintenance |
|
$ |
6,810 |
|
|
$ |
6,711 |
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Professional services |
|
|
3,689 |
|
|
|
3,851 |
|
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
License |
|
|
6,895 |
|
|
|
5,593 |
|
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
17,394 |
|
|
$ |
16,155 |
|
|
|
1,239 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tools segment revenues increased $1.2 million primarily due to an increase in license sales
related to our optimization solutions.
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to Nine Months Ended June 30, 2009 Revenues
Applications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Applications |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Transactional and
maintenance |
|
$ |
194,376 |
|
|
$ |
206,683 |
|
|
$ |
(12,307 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
)% |
Professional services |
|
|
62,583 |
|
|
|
70,697 |
|
|
|
(8,114 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
)% |
License |
|
|
14,239 |
|
|
|
11,164 |
|
|
|
3,075 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
271,198 |
|
|
$ |
288,544 |
|
|
|
(17,346 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications segment revenues decreased $17.3 million due to a $13.7 million decrease in
revenues from our originations solutions, an $8.4 million decrease in our customer management
solutions, a $2.4 million decrease in our fraud solutions, and a $2.4 million decrease from our
collection and recovery solutions. These decreases were partially offset by a $9.6 million
increase in revenues from our marketing solutions.
The decrease in originations solutions was attributable to a decrease in professional services
and the June 2009 divestiture of our Liquid Credit Service for Telecom product line, which
accounted for $9.1 million of revenue during the nine months ended June 30, 2009. Professional
services were impacted because we established VSOE for certain analytic model consulting
services during the quarter ended March 31, 2009. With all other revenue recognition criteria met,
professional services amounts previously recorded as deferred revenue were recognized during the
quarter ended March 31, 2009. The decrease in customer management solutions was attributable to a
decrease in volumes associated with transactional-based agreements and a decline in implementation
services. The decrease in fraud solutions revenues was attributable to the June 2009 divestiture
of our RoamEx product line, which accounted for $6.6 million of revenue during the nine months
ended June 30, 2009. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in volumes and new sales of
our FICO Falcon® Fraud Manager and sales of a new product, FICO® Insurance
Fraud Manager. The decrease in collections and recovery solutions was attributable to a decline in
license sales. The increase in our marketing solutions revenues was attributable to sales of a new
product, FICO® Retail Action Manager.
21
Scores
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Scores |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Transactional and
maintenance |
|
$ |
129,181 |
|
|
$ |
136,262 |
|
|
$ |
(7,081 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
Professional services |
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
130,592 |
|
|
$ |
137,491 |
|
|
|
(6,899 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scores segment revenues decreased $6.9 million due to a $5.6 million decrease in our
myFICO® business-to-consumer services revenues and a $1.3 million decrease in our
business-to-business scores revenues. The decline in our business-to-consumer services was primarily
attributable to Experian terminating its relationship with myFICO.com in February 2009.
Business-to-business scores revenue was impacted by a $4.3 million reduction in prescreen revenues,
partially offset by a true-up of royalty fees with one of the reporting agencies. The decrease in
prescreen revenues was due to a decline in volumes of prescreening initiatives by our customers.
We expect that competitive pricing pressures as well as reduced volumes due to weakness in the U.S.
financial credit market will continue to adversely affect Scores segment revenues in fiscal 2010.
During the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, revenues generated from our agreements
with Equifax, TransUnion and Experian, collectively accounted for approximately 21% and 19%,
respectively, of our total revenues, including revenues from these customers that are recorded in
our other segments.
Tools
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Tools |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Transactional and
maintenance |
|
$ |
21,152 |
|
|
$ |
19,701 |
|
|
$ |
1,451 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Professional services |
|
|
11,710 |
|
|
|
15,866 |
|
|
|
(4,156 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
)% |
License |
|
|
15,893 |
|
|
|
17,211 |
|
|
|
(1,318 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
48,755 |
|
|
$ |
52,778 |
|
|
|
(4,023 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tools segment revenues decreased $4.0 million primarily due to a decrease of license and
professional services sales related to our FICOTM Blaze Advisor® product,
which was negatively impacted by the current business environment. Professional services revenue
declined due to the completion of several large installations in prior periods and fewer
implementation services due to decreased license sales. These decreases were partially offset
by an increase in revenues from our FICOTM Model Builder product.
22
Operating Expenses and Other Income (Expense)
The following table sets forth certain summary information related to our statements of income
for the fiscal periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
Percentage of Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to- |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Period Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
except |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
employees) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
employees) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
155,329 |
|
|
$ |
156,018 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
(689 |
) |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
45,316 |
|
|
|
48,160 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
(2,844 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
)% |
Research and development |
|
|
19,176 |
|
|
|
18,364 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
812 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
57,077 |
|
|
|
50,290 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
6,787 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Amortization of intangible
assets |
|
|
2,683 |
|
|
|
3,219 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(536 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
)% |
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
(100 |
)% |
Loss on sale of product line assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,993 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(2,993 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
124,252 |
|
|
|
122,789 |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
79 |
% |
|
|
1,463 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
31,077 |
|
|
|
33,229 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
(2,152 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
)% |
Interest income |
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
(543 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
)% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(5,462 |
) |
|
|
(6,086 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
(10 |
)% |
Other income, net |
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
26,709 |
|
|
|
28,582 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
(1,873 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
)% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
8,771 |
|
|
|
10,443 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
(1,672 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
17,938 |
|
|
$ |
18,139 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
(201 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees at quarter
end |
|
|
2,153 |
|
|
|
2,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
% |
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Percentage of Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to- |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Period Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
except |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
employees) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
employees) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
450,545 |
|
|
$ |
478,813 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
(28,268 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
132,476 |
|
|
|
160,655 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
(28,179 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
)% |
Research and development |
|
|
57,403 |
|
|
|
55,409 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
1,994 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
165,977 |
|
|
|
157,519 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
8,458 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Amortization of intangible
assets |
|
|
8,918 |
|
|
|
9,622 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(704 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
)% |
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,711 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(8,711 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
)% |
Loss on sale of product line assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,993 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
(2,993 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
364,774 |
|
|
|
394,909 |
|
|
|
81 |
% |
|
|
82 |
% |
|
|
(30,135 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
85,771 |
|
|
|
83,904 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
1,867 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Interest income |
|
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
3,836 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
(2,397 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
)% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(16,293 |
) |
|
|
(19,771 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
3,478 |
|
|
|
(18 |
)% |
Other income, net |
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
1,651 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
72,264 |
|
|
|
69,620 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
2,644 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
23,648 |
|
|
|
21,263 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
2,385 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
48,616 |
|
|
|
48,357 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
(100 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
48,616 |
|
|
$ |
47,994 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues consists primarily of employee salaries and benefits for personnel directly
involved in developing, installing and supporting revenue products; travel costs; overhead costs;
costs of computer service bureaus; internal network hosting costs; amounts payable to credit
reporting agencies for scores; software costs; and expenses related to our business-to-consumer
services.
The quarter over quarter decrease of $2.8 million in cost of revenues resulted from a $2.3
million decrease in personnel and other labor-related costs, a $1.3 million decrease in facilities
and infrastructure costs and a $0.2 million decrease in other costs, partially offset by a $1.0
million increase in direct material costs. The decrease in personnel and other labor-related costs
was attributable primarily to a decline in salary and related benefit costs resulting from staff
reductions and from the decline in professional services activities. The decrease in facilities
and infrastructure costs was attributable primarily to a decline in allocated costs resulting from
overhead reductions and exiting certain facilities. The increase in direct material costs is
attributable to increased sales in our myFICO® business-to-consumer services that
required data acquisition.
The year-to-date period over period decrease of $28.2 million in cost of revenues resulted
from a $15.0 million decrease in personnel and other labor-related costs, a $10.1 million decrease
in facilities and infrastructure costs, a $2.4 million decrease in third party software and data
costs and a $0.7 million decrease in other costs. The decrease in personnel and other
labor-related costs was attributable primarily to a decline in salary and related benefit costs
resulting from staff reductions and from the decline in professional services activities. The
decrease in facilities and infrastructure costs was attributable primarily to a decline in
allocated costs resulting from overhead reductions and exiting certain facilities. The decrease in
third party software and data costs was due to decreased sales in our myFICO®
business-to-consumer services that required data acquisition.
Over the next several quarters, we expect that cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues
will be consistent when compared to those incurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2010.
24
Research and Development
Research and development expenses include the personnel and related overhead costs incurred in
the development of new products and services, including the research of mathematical and
statistical models and the development of new versions of Applications and Tools products.
Research and development expenditures for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 were consistent with
expenditures in the quarter ended June 30, 2009.
The year-to-date period over period increase of $2.0 million in research and development
expenditures was attributable primarily to an increase in personnel and related costs due to
increased salaries for the period ended June 30, 2010.
Over the next several quarters, we expect that research and development expenditures will be
consistent with those incurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2010.
Selling, General and Administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist principally of employee salaries and
benefits, travel, overhead, advertising and other promotional expenses, corporate facilities
expenses, legal expenses, business development expenses, and the cost of operating computer
systems.
The quarter over quarter increase of $6.8 million in selling, general and administrative
expenses was attributable to a $5.5 million increase in personnel and related costs, a $1.3 million
increase in marketing expenses, a $1.1 million increase in travel expenses and a $0.9 million
increase in other expenses, partially offset by a $2.0 million decrease in professional fees. The
quarter over quarter increase in personnel and related costs was primarily due to increased
salaries and benefits and commissions for the period ended June 30, 2010. The increase in
marketing expense was attributable to the timing of our marketing events. The increase in
travel expenses was due to increased travel to support sales efforts. The decline in professional
fees was primarily due to decreased legal fees.
The year-to-date period over period increase of $8.5 million in selling, general and
administrative expenses was attributable to a $11.1 million increase in personnel and related
costs, a $2.3 million increase in travel expenses and a $1.9 million increase in marketing
expenses, partially offset by a $4.0 million decrease in professional fees and a $2.8 million
decrease in other costs, which includes bad debt expense, taxes and licenses and other
miscellaneous expenses. The increase in personnel and related costs was primarily due to increased
salaries and benefits and commissions for the nine months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in
travel expenses was due to increased travel to support sales efforts. The increase in marketing
expense was attributable to the timing of marketing campaigns and related activities. The decline
in professional fees was primarily due to decreased legal fees.
Over the next several quarters, we expect that selling, general and administrative expenses
will increase slightly when compared to those incurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2010.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Amortization of intangible assets consists of amortization expense related to intangible
assets recorded in connection with acquisitions accounted for by the purchase method of accounting.
Our definite-lived intangible assets, consisting primarily of completed technology and customer
contracts and relationships, are being amortized using the straight-line method or based on
forecasted cash flows associated with the assets over periods ranging from two to fifteen years.
Over the next several quarters, we expect that amortization expense will be slightly lower
than the amortization expense we recorded during the quarter ended June 30, 2010.
Restructuring
During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we recorded a $0.2 million expense reversal related to
a lease termination.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we recognized a $1.2 million charge due to
unfavorable sublease arrangements we entered into for office space previously vacated. The charge
was offset by a $0.4 million reduction in other restructuring liabilities.
25
During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, in connection with our reengineering initiative,
we incurred net charges totaling $8.1 million. The charges included $5.9 million for severance
costs associated with the reduction of 255 positions throughout the company. Cash payments for all
severance costs were paid during fiscal 2009. We also recognized charges of $2.6 million
associated with vacating excess leased space. The charge represents future cash lease payments, net
of estimated sublease income, which will be paid by fiscal 2018. In addition, we reversed $0.4
million of accrued expenses as a result of a favorable lease termination agreement that we entered
into for office space that was previously vacated.
We did not incur any restructuring charges during the three and nine months ended June 30,
2010.
Interest Income
Interest income is derived primarily from the investment of funds in excess of our immediate
operating requirements. The quarter over quarter decrease in interest income of $0.5 million was
attributable to a decline in interest rates and investment income yields due to market conditions
and a decrease in total investment balances outstanding.
The year-to-date period over period decrease in interest income of $2.4 million was attributable to a decline in
interest rates and investment yields due to market conditions and a decrease in total investment
balances outstanding.
Interest Expense
Interest expense recorded during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 included interest on our
Senior Notes and interest associated with borrowings under our revolving line of credit. The
decrease in interest expense of $0.6 million in such quarter was the result of lower average
interest rates on our revolving line of credit.
The year-to-date period over period decrease in interest expense of $3.5 million was attributable to lower
average interest rates on our revolving line of credit in fiscal 2010.
On July 14, 2010 we issued $245 million of Senior Notes in a private placement to a group of
institutional investors. The proceeds from these Senior Notes were used to repay the amounts outstanding on our revolving
line of credit. Interest expense will increase when compared to that incurred during the
quarter ended June 30, 2010 because the weighted-average interest rate on our new Senior Notes is 5.2% compared to 0.8%
on our revolving line of credit. As a result, our quarterly interest
expense will increase approximately $2.7 million and our earnings will
decrease approximately $0.04 per share.
Other Income, Net
Other income, net consists primarily of realized investment gains/losses, exchange rate
gains/losses resulting from re-measurement of foreign-denominated receivable and cash balances into
the U.S. dollar functional currency at period-end market rates, net of the impact of offsetting
forward exchange contracts, and other non-operating items.
Other income, net in the quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2010 was consistent with other
income, net in the quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
Provision for Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate was 32.8% and 36.5% during the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively and 32.7% and 30.5% during the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The provision for income taxes during interim quarterly reporting periods is based on our
estimates of the effective tax rates for the respective full fiscal year. The tax rate in any
quarter can be affected positively or negatively by adjustments that are required to be reported in
the specific quarter of resolution. Our effective tax rate for
the quarter ended June 30, 2010, was negatively affected by the delay in the extension of the U.S.
federal research and development tax credit. We were unable to recognize this tax credit during
the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as legislation providing for reinstatement of this credit has not
yet been enacted. The decrease in our effective tax rate in the third quarter of 2010 was due to
a higher tax rate in the quarter ended June 30, 2009 from the sale of our RoamEx and LCT product
lines. These product line sales included a write-off of goodwill that was not deductible for
income tax purposes.
26
Operating Income
The following table sets forth certain summary information on a segment basis related to our
operating income for the fiscal periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Segment |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Applications |
|
$ |
23,427 |
|
|
$ |
29,261 |
|
|
$ |
(5,834 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
)% |
Scores |
|
|
30,598 |
|
|
|
32,390 |
|
|
|
(1,792 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
)% |
Tools |
|
|
1,985 |
|
|
|
1,861 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Unallocated corporate expenses |
|
|
(18,397 |
) |
|
|
(19,614 |
) |
|
|
1,217 |
|
|
|
(6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating income |
|
|
37,613 |
|
|
|
43,898 |
|
|
|
(6,285 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
)% |
Unallocated share-based compensation |
|
|
(3,853 |
) |
|
|
(4,694 |
) |
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
(18 |
)% |
Unallocated amortization expense |
|
|
(2,683 |
) |
|
|
(3,219 |
) |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
(17 |
)% |
Unallocated restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
)% |
Loss on sale of product line assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,993 |
) |
|
|
2,993 |
|
|
|
(100 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
31,077 |
|
|
$ |
33,229 |
|
|
|
(2,152 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Segment |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Applications |
|
$ |
69,673 |
|
|
$ |
82,948 |
|
|
$ |
(13,275 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
)% |
Scores |
|
|
85,206 |
|
|
|
93,315 |
|
|
|
(8,109 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
)% |
Tools |
|
|
5,457 |
|
|
|
6,813 |
|
|
|
(1,356 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
)% |
Unallocated corporate expenses |
|
|
(52,412 |
) |
|
|
(62,504 |
) |
|
|
10,092 |
|
|
|
(16 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating income |
|
|
107,924 |
|
|
|
120,572 |
|
|
|
(12,648 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
)% |
Unallocated share-based compensation |
|
|
(13,235 |
) |
|
|
(15,342 |
) |
|
|
2,107 |
|
|
|
(14 |
)% |
Unallocated amortization expense |
|
|
(8,918 |
) |
|
|
(9,622 |
) |
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
(7 |
)% |
Unallocated restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,711 |
) |
|
|
8,711 |
|
|
|
(100 |
)% |
Loss on sale of product line assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,993 |
) |
|
|
2,993 |
|
|
|
(100 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
85,771 |
|
|
$ |
83,904 |
|
|
|
1,867 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The quarter over quarter decrease of $2.2 million in operating income was attributable to a
decline in segment revenues partially offset by a decrease in corporate operating expenses, a
decrease in share-based compensation expenses, a decrease in amortization expense and a decrease in
loss on sale of product lines assets. At the segment level, the decrease in segment operating
income was driven by a decrease of $5.8 million in segment operating income in our Applications
segment and a decrease of $1.8 million in our Scores segment.
The decrease in our Applications segment was attributable to a decrease in revenue as well as
an increase in segment operating expenses, primarily due to increasing salary and benefit expenses
and commission expenses.
The decrease in our Scores segment operating income was attributable primarily to an increase
in segment operating expenses. Operating expense increased primarily due to data acquisition costs
from increasing myFICO business-to-consumer revenues and salary and benefit expenses.
27
The decrease in corporate expenses was due to staff reductions and facility consolidations,
driven by our reengineering initiative, and a reduction in legal fees.
The year-to-date period over period increase of $1.8 million in operating income was
attributable to a reduction in segment and corporate operating expenses, which was driven by our
reengineering initiative, a decrease in restructuring expenses, a decrease in share-based
compensation expense and a decrease in loss on sale of product line assets, partially offset by a
decline in segment revenues. Under the reengineering initiative, we have reduced operating costs
through staff reductions, facility consolidations and restriction of discretionary expenditures.
At the segment level, our segment operating income was negatively impacted by a $13.3 million
decrease in our Applications segment, an $8.1 million decrease in our Scores segment and a $1.4
million decrease in our Tools segment.
The decrease in our Applications segment operating income was attributable to a decrease in
revenue, partially offset by a decrease in operating expenses, which was driven by our
reengineering initiative.
The decrease in our Scores segment operating income was attributable primarily to a decline in
prescreen revenues and revenues derived from business-to-consumer services.
In our Tools segment, the decrease in segment operating income was primarily attributed to a
decrease in Blaze Advisor revenues, partially offset by an increase in FICO Model Builder revenues
and lower operating expenses, which was driven by our reengineering initiative.
The decrease in corporate expenses was due to staff reductions and facility consolidations,
driven by our reengineering initiative, and a decrease in legal fees.
Discontinued Operations
In March 2009, we recorded a charge of $0.4 million, net of tax, resulting from the resolution
of a final working capital adjustment in favor of the purchaser.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $84.0 million during
the nine months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $124.3 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2009.
Operating cash flows were impacted by a $7.9 million increase in accounts receivable, a $3.5
million increase in accrued compensation and employee benefits, a $3.5 million increase in deferred
revenue and a $0.6 million increase in other liabilities for the nine months ended June 30, 2010
compared to a $35.3 million decrease in accounts receivable, a $0.6 million decrease in accrued
compensation and employee benefits, a $10.4 million decrease in other liabilities and a $7.2
million increase in deferred revenue for the nine months ended June 30, 2009.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash provided by investing activities totaled $40.3 million during the nine months ended
June 30, 2010, compared to cash used of $12.2 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2009. The
increase in cash flows from investing activities was primarily attributable to $50.8 million in
proceeds from maturities of marketable securities, net of purchases, during the nine months ended
June 30, 2010 compared to $3.2 million that was used for purchases of marketable securities, net of
proceeds from maturities, during the nine months ended June 30, 2009.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $187.2 million in the nine months ended June 30,
2010, compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $20,000 during the nine months ended
June 30, 2009. The decrease in cash flows from financing activities was primarily due to the
$137.5 million of cash paid to repurchase of common stock during the nine months ended June 30,
2010 and $50.0 million in cash paid on our revolving line of credit.
Repurchases of Common Stock
In June 2010, our Board of Directors approved a common stock repurchase program that allows us
to purchase shares of our
28
common stock up to an aggregate cost of $250.0 million, which replaced a
similar program approved in November 2007. From time to time, we repurchase our common stock in the
open market pursuant to this program. During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, we
repurchased 3.6 million shares of our common stock for $82.0 million and 6.2 million shares of
common stock for $139.5 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2010, we had $233.2 million
remaining under this authorization.
Dividends
During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, we paid a quarterly dividend of two cents per common
share, which is representative of the eight cents per year dividend we have paid in recent years.
Our dividend rate is set by the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis taking into account a
variety of factors, including among others, our operating results and cash flows, general economic
and industry conditions, our obligations, changes in applicable tax laws and other factors deemed
relevant by the Board. Although we expect to continue to pay dividends at the current rate, our
dividend rate is subject to change from time to time based on the Boards business judgment with
respect to these and other relevant factors.
Revolving Line of Credit
We have a $600 million unsecured revolving line of credit with a syndicate of banks that
expires in October 2011. Proceeds from the revolving line of credit can be used for working
capital and general corporate purposes and may also be used for the refinancing of existing debt,
acquisitions, and the repurchase of the Companys common stock. Interest on amounts borrowed under
the revolving line of credit is based on (i) a base rate, which is the greater of (a) the prime
rate and (b) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50% or (ii) LIBOR plus an applicable margin. The margin
on LIBOR borrowings ranges from 0.30% to 0.55% and is determined based on our consolidated leverage
ratio. In addition, we must pay utilization fees if borrowings and commitments under the revolving
line of credit exceed 50% of the total commitment, as well as facility fees. The revolving line of
credit contains certain restrictive covenants, including maintenance of consolidated leverage and
fixed charge coverage ratios. The revolving line of credit also contains covenants typical of
unsecured facilities. As of June 30, 2010, we were in compliance with all covenants under the
revolving line of credit and we had $245.0 million of borrowings outstanding at an interest rate of
0.8%. On July 14, 2010, we repaid all outstanding obligations under the revolving line of credit
using proceeds from the issuance of $245 million of Senior Notes in a private placement to a group
of institutional investors. These Senior Notes have a weighted-average interest rate of 5.2% and a weighted-average maturity of 8 years.
Senior Notes
In May 2008, we issued $275 million of Senior Notes in a private placement to a group of
institutional investors. The Senior Notes were issued in four series with maturities ranging from
5 to 10 years. The Senior Notes weighted average interest rate is 6.8% and the weighted average
maturity is 7.9 years. The Senior Notes are subject to certain restrictive covenants that are
substantially similar to those in the credit agreement for the revolving line of credit including
maintenance of consolidated leverage and fixed charge coverage
ratios. The purchase agreement for the Senior Notes also includes covenants typical of unsecured facilities. As of June 30, 2010 we were in compliance with all covenants related to the Senior Notes.
Capital Resources and Liquidity Outlook
As of June 30, 2010, we had $260.8 million in cash, cash equivalents and marketable security
investments. We believe that these balances, as well as available borrowings from our $600 million
revolving line of credit and anticipated cash flows from operating activities, will be sufficient
to fund our working and other capital requirements and any scheduled repayments of existing debt
over the course of the next twelve months. Under our current financing arrangements we have no
significant debt obligations maturing until May 2013. In the normal course of business, we
evaluate the merits of acquiring technology or businesses, or establishing strategic relationships
with or investing in these businesses. We may elect to use available cash and cash equivalents and
marketable security investments to fund such activities in the future. In the event additional
needs for cash arise we may raise additional funds from a
combination of sources, including the potential issuance of debt or equity securities. Additional
financing might not be available on terms favorable to us, or at all. If adequate funds were not
available or were not available on acceptable terms, our ability to take advantage of unanticipated
opportunities or respond to competitive pressures could be limited.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a
current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition,
revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.
29
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. These accounting principles require management to make certain judgments and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We periodically evaluate our
estimates including those relating to revenue recognition, the allowance for doubtful accounts,
goodwill and other intangible assets resulting from business acquisitions, income taxes and
contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other
assumptions that we believe to be reasonable based on the specific circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of certain assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates.
We believe the following critical accounting policies involve the most significant judgments
and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
Revenue Recognition
Software Licenses
Software license fee revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery of the product has occurred at our customers location, the fee is fixed or determinable
and collection is probable. The determination of whether fees are fixed or determinable and
collection is probable involves the use of assumptions. If at the outset of an arrangement we
determine that the arrangement fee is not fixed or determinable, revenue is deferred until the
arrangement fee becomes fixed or determinable, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have
been met. If at the outset of an arrangement we determine that collectability is not probable,
revenue is deferred until the earlier of when collectability becomes probable or the receipt of
payment. If there is uncertainty as to the customers acceptance of our deliverables, revenue is
not recognized until the earlier of receipt of customer acceptance, expiration of the acceptance
period, or when we can demonstrate we meet the acceptance criteria. We evaluate contract terms
and customer information to ensure that these criteria are met prior to our recognition of license
fee revenue.
We use the residual method to recognize revenue when an arrangement includes one or more
elements to be delivered at a future date and vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of the
fair value of all undelivered elements exists. VSOE of fair value is based on the normal pricing
practices for those products and services when sold separately by us and customer renewal rates for
post-contract customer support services. Under the residual method, the fair value of the
undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is recognized as
revenue. If evidence of the fair value of one or more undelivered elements does not exist, the
revenue is deferred and recognized when delivery of those elements occurs or when fair value can be
established. Changes to the elements in a software arrangement, the ability to identify VSOE for
those elements, the fair value of the respective elements, and change to a products estimated life
cycle could materially impact the amount of earned and unearned revenue.
When software licenses are sold together with implementation or consulting services, license
fees are recognized upon delivery provided that the above criteria are met, payment of the license
fees is not dependent upon the performance of the services, and the services do not provide
significant customization or modification of the software products and are not essential to the
functionality of the software that was delivered. For arrangements with services that are essential
to the functionality of the software, the license and related service revenues are recognized using
contract accounting as described below.
Revenues from post-contract customer support services, such as software maintenance, are
recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the support period. The majority of our
software maintenance agreements provide technical support as well as unspecified software product
upgrades and releases when and if made available by us during the term of the support period.
Transactional-based Revenues
Transactional-based revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
fees are fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. Revenues from our credit
scoring, data processing, data management and internet delivery services are recognized as these
services are performed. Revenues from transactional or unit-based license fees under software
license arrangements, network service and internally-hosted software agreements are recognized
based on minimum contractual amounts or on system usage that exceeds minimum contractual amounts.
Certain of our transactional-based revenues are based on transaction or active account volumes as
reported by our clients. In instances where volumes are reported to us in arrears, we estimate
volumes based on preliminary customer transaction information or average actual reported volumes
for an immediate trailing period. Differences between our estimates and actual final volumes
reported are recorded in the period in which actual volumes are reported. We have not experienced
significant variances between our estimates and actual reported volumes in the past and anticipate
that we will be able to continue to make reasonable estimates in the future. If for some reason we
were unable to reasonably estimate
30
transaction volumes in the future, revenue may be deferred until actual customer data is received,
and this could have a material impact on our results of operations during the period of time that
we changed accounting methods.
Consulting Services
We provide consulting, training, model development and software integration services under
both hourly-based time and materials and fixed-priced contracts. Revenues from these services are
generally recognized as the services are performed. For fixed-price service contracts, we apply the
percentage-of-completion method of contract accounting to determine progress towards completion,
which requires the use of estimates. In such instances, management is required to estimate the
input measures, generally based on hours incurred to date compared to total estimated hours of the
project, with consideration also given to output measures, such as contract milestones, when
applicable. Adjustments to estimates are made in the period in which the facts requiring such
revisions become known and, accordingly, recognized revenues and profits are subject to revisions
as the contract progresses to completion. Estimated losses, if any, are recorded in the period in
which current estimates of total contract revenue and contract costs indicate a loss. If
substantive uncertainty related to customer acceptance of services exists, we apply the completed
contract method of accounting and defer the associated revenue until the contract is completed. If
we are unable to accurately estimate the input measures used for percentage-of-completion
accounting, revenue would be deferred until the contract is complete, and this could have a
material impact on our consolidated results of operations.
Hosting Services
We sell hosting services (ASP) where a customer may access the software that resides on our
servers. The ASP model typically includes an up-front fee and a monthly commitment from the
customer that commences upon completion of the implementation through the remainder of the
contractual term. The up-front fee is the initial setup fee, or the implementation fee. The monthly
commitment includes, but is not limited to, a fixed monthly fee or a transactional fee based on
system usage that exceeds monthly minimums. Revenue is recognized from ASP when there is persuasive
evidence of an arrangement, the service has been provided to the customer, the amount of fees is
fixed or determinable and the collection of the Companys fees is probable. We do not view the
activities of signing the contract or providing initial setup services as discrete earnings events.
Revenue is deferred until the date the customer commences use of our services at which point the
up-front fees are recognized ratably over the contractual term of the customer arrangement. ASP
transactional fees are recorded monthly as earned.
Non-Software Multiple-Deliverable Arrangements
Each deliverable within a multiple-deliverable revenue arrangement is accounted for as a
separate unit of accounting if the following criteria are met: (i) the delivered item or items
have value to the customer on a standalone basis and (ii) for an arrangement that includes a
general right of return relative to the delivered item(s), delivery or performance of the
undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in our control. We consider a
deliverable to have standalone value if we sell this item separately or if the item is sold by
another vendor or could be resold by the customer. Further, our revenue arrangements generally do
not include a general right of return relative to delivered products. Revenue for multiple element
arrangements is allocated to the software and non-software deliverables based on a relative selling
price. We use VSOE in our allocation of arrangement consideration when it is available. We define
VSOE as a median price of recent standalone transactions that are priced within a narrow range, as
defined by us. If a product or service is seldom sold separately, it is unlikely that we can
determine VSOE. In circumstances when VSOE does not exist, we then assess whether we can obtain
third-party evidence (TPE) of the selling price. It may be difficult for us to obtain sufficient
information on competitor pricing to substantiate TPE and therefore we may not always be able to
use TPE. When we are unable to establish selling price using VSOE or TPE, we use estimated selling
price (ESP) in its allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of ESP is to determine
the price at which we would transact if the product or service were sold by us on a standalone
basis. Our determination of ESP involves weighting several factors based on the specific facts
and circumstances of each arrangement. The factors include, but are not limited to, geographies,
market conditions, gross margin objectives, pricing practices and controls and customer segment
pricing strategies and the product lifecycle. We analyze selling prices used in our allocation of
arrangement consideration on an annual basis, or more frequently if necessary. Selling prices will
be analyzed more frequently if a significant change in our business necessitates a more timely
analysis or if we experience significant variances in our selling prices.
Gross vs. Net Revenue Reporting
We apply accounting guidance to determine whether we report revenue for certain transactions
based upon the gross amount billed to the customer, or the net amount retained by us. In accordance
with the guidance we record revenue on a gross basis for sales in which we have acted as the
principal and on a net basis for those sales in which we have in substance acted as an agent or
broker in the transaction.
31
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We make estimates regarding the collectability of our accounts receivable. When we evaluate
the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts, we analyze specific accounts receivable
balances, historical bad debts, customer creditworthiness, current economic trends and changes in
our customer payment cycles. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of expense
for any period if we were to make different judgments or utilize different estimates. If the
financial condition of our customers deteriorates resulting in an impairment of their ability to
make payments, additional allowances might be required.
Business Acquisitions; Valuation of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Our business acquisitions typically result in the recognition of goodwill and other intangible
assets, which affect the amount of current and future period charges and amortization expense.
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired,
including identified intangible assets, in connection with our business combinations accounted for
by the purchase method of accounting. We amortize our definite-lived intangible assets based on
forecasted cash flows associated with the assets over the estimated useful lives. Goodwill is not
amortized, but is assessed at least annually for impairment.
The determination of the value of these components of a business combination, as well as
associated asset useful lives, requires management to make various estimates and assumptions.
Critical estimates in valuing certain of the intangible assets include but are not limited to:
future expected cash flows from product sales and services, maintenance agreements, consulting
contracts, customer contracts, and acquired developed technologies and patents or trademarks; the
acquired companys brand awareness and market position, as well as assumptions about the period of
time the acquired products and services will continue to be used in our product portfolio; and
discount rates. Managements estimates of fair value and useful lives are based upon assumptions
believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. Unanticipated
events and circumstances may occur and assumptions may change. Estimates using different
assumptions could also produce significantly different results.
We continually review the events and circumstances related to our financial performance and
economic environment for factors that would provide evidence of the impairment of our intangible
assets. When impairment indicators are identified with respect to our previously recorded
intangible assets with finite useful lives, we test for impairment using undiscounted cash flows.
If such tests indicate impairment, then we measure the impairment as the difference between the
carrying value of the asset and the fair value of the asset, which is measured using discounted
cash flows. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are assessed annually for impairment by comparing
the fair value of such intangible assets, measured using discounted cash flows, to the respective
fair value. To the extent the fair value is less than the associated carrying value, impairment is
recorded. Significant management judgment is required in forecasting of future operating results,
which are used in the preparation of the projected discounted cash flows and should different
conditions prevail, material write downs of net intangible assets and other long-lived assets could
occur. We periodically review the estimated remaining useful lives of our acquired intangible
assets. A reduction in our estimate of remaining useful lives, if any, could result in increased
amortization expense in future periods.
We test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level at least annually during the
fourth quarter of each fiscal year and more frequently if impairment indicators are identified. We
have determined that our reporting units are the same as our reportable segments. The first step of
the goodwill impairment test is a comparison of the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying
value. We estimate the fair values of our reporting units using discounted cash flow valuation
models and by comparing our reporting units to guideline publicly-traded companies. These methods
require estimates of our future revenues, profits, capital expenditures, working capital, and other
relevant factors, as well as selecting appropriate guideline publicly-traded companies for each
reporting unit. We estimate these amounts by evaluating historical trends, current budgets,
operating plans, industry data, and other relevant factors. The estimated fair value of each of our
reporting units exceeded its respective carrying value as of our last testing date on July 1, 2009,
indicating the underlying goodwill of each reporting unit was not impaired. Accordingly, we were
not required to complete the second step of the goodwill impairment test. The timing and frequency
of our goodwill impairment test is based on an ongoing assessment of events and circumstances that
would more than likely reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. There
are various assumptions and estimates underlying the determination of an impairment loss, and
estimates using different, but each reasonable, assumptions could produce significantly different
results and materially affect the determination of fair value and/or goodwill impairment for each
reporting unit. We believe that the assumptions and estimates utilized were appropriate based on
the information available to management. The timing and recognition of impairment losses by us in
the future, if any, may be highly dependent upon our estimates and assumptions.
Due to ongoing uncertainty in economic conditions and weakness in financial credit markets,
which have adversely affected the fair value of our reporting units, we will continue to carefully
monitor and evaluate the carrying value of goodwill. We had $660.8
million of goodwill recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2010. As of the
most recent testing date (July 1, 2009),
32
the fair value of our reporting units (as configured at
that time) exceeded their respective carrying values by between $20 million and $329 million.
However, if difficult market and economic conditions continue over a sustained period, we may
experience a further decline in the fair value of one or more of our reporting units as compared to
fiscal 2009 year-end levels. Such further declines in fair value may require us to record an
impairment charge related to goodwill.
Share-Based Compensation
We account for share-based compensation using the fair value recognition provisions as
required in the accounting literature. We estimate the fair value of options granted using the
Black-Scholes option valuation model. We estimate the volatility of our common stock at the date
of grant based on a combination of the implied volatility of publicly traded options on our common
stock and our historical volatility rate. Our decision to use implied volatility was based upon
the availability of actively traded options on our common stock and our assessment that implied
volatility is more representative of future stock price trends than historical volatility. We
estimate the expected term of options granted based on historical exercise patterns. The dividend
yield assumption is based on historical dividend payouts. The risk-free interest rate assumption
is based on observed interest rates appropriate for the term of our employee options. We use
historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures and record share-based compensation
expense only for those awards that are expected to vest. For options granted, we amortize the fair
value on a straight-line basis. All options are amortized over the requisite service periods of the
awards, which are generally the vesting periods. If factors change we may decide to use different
assumptions under the Black-Scholes option valuation model in the future, which could materially
affect our share-based compensation expense, net income and earnings per share.
Income Taxes
We use the asset and liability approach to account for income taxes. This methodology
recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of
temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax base of assets and liabilities and
operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. We then record a valuation allowance to reduce
deferred tax assets to an amount that more likely than not will be realized. We consider future
taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for
the valuation allowance, which requires the use of estimates. If we determine during any period
that we could realize a larger net deferred tax asset than the recorded amount, we would adjust the
deferred tax asset to increase income for the period or reduce goodwill if such deferred tax asset
relates to an acquisition. Conversely, if we determine that we would be unable to realize a
portion of our recorded deferred tax asset, we would adjust the deferred tax asset to record a
charge to income. To the extent an adjustment in our deferred tax assets relates to a business
combination the adjustment is recorded either in income from continuing operations in the period of
the combination or directly in contributed capital, depending on the circumstances. Although we
believe that our estimates are reasonable, there is no assurance that our valuation allowance will
not need to be increased to cover additional deferred tax assets that may not be realizable, and
such an increase could have a material adverse impact on our income tax provision and results of
operations in the period in which such determination is made. In addition, the calculation of tax
liabilities also involves significant judgment in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the
application of complex tax laws. Resolution of these uncertainties in a manner inconsistent with
managements expectations could also have a material impact on our income tax provision and results
of operations in the period in which such determination is made.
We adopted accounting guidance related to the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes on
October 1, 2007. The cumulative effect of the change did not result in an adjustment to the
beginning balance of retained earnings. Following implementation, the ongoing recognition of
changes in measurement of uncertain tax positions will be reflected as a component of income tax
expense.
Contingencies and Litigation
We are subject to various proceedings, lawsuits and claims relating to products and services,
technology, labor, shareholder and other matters. We are required to assess the likelihood of any
adverse outcomes and the potential range of probable losses in these matters. If the potential loss
is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, we accrue a liability for the
estimated loss. If the potential loss is considered less than probable or the amount cannot be
reasonably estimated, disclosure of the matter is considered. The amount of loss accrual or
disclosure, if any, is determined after analysis of each matter, and is subject to adjustment if
warranted by new developments or revised strategies. Due to uncertainties related to these matters,
accruals or disclosures are based on the best information available at the time. Significant
judgment is required in both the assessment of likelihood and in the determination of a range of
potential losses. Revisions in the estimates of the potential liabilities could have a material
impact on our consolidated financial position or consolidated results of operations.
33
New Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In June 2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance related to the consolidation of variable
interest entities. The guidance requires revised evaluations of whether entities represent
variable interest entities, ongoing assessments of control over such entities, and additional
disclosures for variable interests. We are in the process of determining what effect, if any, the
adoption of this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market Risk Disclosures
We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates, equity market prices, and
foreign currency exchange rates. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or
trading purposes.
Interest Rate Risk
We maintain an investment portfolio consisting mainly of income securities with an average
maturity of three years or less. These available-for-sale securities are subject to interest rate
risk and will fall in value if market interest rates increase. We have the ability to hold our
fixed income investments until maturity, and therefore we would not expect our operating results or
cash flows to be affected to any significant degree by the effect of a sudden change in market
interest rates on our securities portfolio. The following table presents the principal amounts and
related weighted-average yields for our investments with interest rate risk at June 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Cost Basis |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Cost Basis |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
112,612 |
|
|
$ |
112,612 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
% |
|
$ |
178,157 |
|
|
$ |
178,157 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
% |
Short-term investments |
|
|
129,079 |
|
|
|
129,173 |
|
|
|
0.98 |
% |
|
|
139,149 |
|
|
|
139,673 |
|
|
|
1.26 |
% |
Long-term investments |
|
|
15,015 |
|
|
|
15,084 |
|
|
|
1.13 |
% |
|
|
57,437 |
|
|
|
57,611 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
256,706 |
|
|
$ |
256,869 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
% |
|
$ |
374,743 |
|
|
$ |
375,441 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In May 2008, we issued $275 million of Senior Notes to a group of institutional investors in a
private placement. The fair value of our Senior Notes may increase or decrease due to various
factors, including fluctuations in market interest rates and fluctuations in general economic
conditions. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Capital Resources and Liquidity, above, for additional information on the Senior
Notes. The following table presents the principal amounts, carrying amounts, and fair values for
our Senior Notes at June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
Amounts |
|
Fair Value |
|
Principal |
|
Amounts |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Senior Notes |
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
|
$ |
313,325 |
|
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
|
$ |
301,295 |
|
We have interest rate risk with respect to our five-year $600 million unsecured revolving line
of credit. Interest on amounts borrowed under the revolving line of credit is based on (i) a base
rate, which is the greater of (a) the prime rate and (b) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50% or (ii)
LIBOR plus an applicable margin. The margin on LIBOR borrowings ranges from 0.30% to 0.55% and is
determined based on our consolidated leverage ratio. A change in interest rates on this variable
rate debt impacts the interest incurred and cash flows, but does not impact the fair value of the
instrument. We had $245 million of borrowings outstanding on this facility as of June 30, 2010
and $295 million of borrowings outstanding on September 30, 2009. On July 14, 2010 we issued $245
million of Senior Notes in a private placement to a group of institutional investors. The Notes
include a weighted average interest rate of 5.2% and a weighted average maturity of 8 years.
Proceeds from the Notes were used to repay the entire balance outstanding on our revolving line of
credit.
34
Forward Foreign Currency Contracts
We maintain a program to manage our foreign currency exchange rate risk on existing foreign
currency receivable and bank balances by entering into forward contracts to sell or buy foreign
currency. At period end, foreign-denominated receivables and cash balances are remeasured into the
U.S. dollar functional currency at current market rates. The change in value from this
remeasurement is then reported as a foreign exchange gain or loss for that period in our
accompanying consolidated statements of income and the resulting gain or loss on the forward
contract mitigates the exchange rate risk of the associated assets. All of our forward foreign
currency contracts have maturity periods of less than three months. Such derivative financial
instruments are subject to market risk.
The following table summarizes our outstanding forward foreign currency contracts, by currency
at June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Contract Amount |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency |
|
US$ |
|
US$ |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Sell foreign currency: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian dollar (CAD) |
|
CAD |
1,125 |
|
|
$ |
1,065 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Euro (EUR) |
|
EUR |
5,680 |
|
|
|
6,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buy foreign currency: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
British pound (GBP) |
|
GBP |
3,473 |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Contract Amount |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency |
|
US$ |
|
US$ |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Sell foreign currency: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian dollar (CAD) |
|
CAD |
1,100 |
|
|
$ |
1,022 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Euro (EUR) |
|
EUR |
6,100 |
|
|
|
8,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
Japanese yen (JPY) |
|
JPY |
61,000 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buy foreign currency: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
British pound (GBP) |
|
GBP |
2,866 |
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
The forward foreign currency contracts were all entered into on June 30, 2010 and September
30, 2009, respectively; therefore, the fair value was $0 on that date.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of FICOs
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness
of the design and operation of FICOs disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule
13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end
of the period covered by this quarterly report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that FICOs disclosure controls and procedures
are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by FICO in reports that it files
or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
35
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No change in FICOs internal control over financial reporting was identified in connection
with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the period
covered by this quarterly report and that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On October 11, 2006, we filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of
Minnesota captioned Fair Isaac Corporation and myFICO Consumer Services Inc. v. Equifax Inc.,
Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., TransUnion LLC,
VantageScore Solutions LLC, and Does I through X. The lawsuit related in part to the development,
marketing, and distribution of VantageScore, a credit score product developed by VantageScore
Solutions LLC, which is jointly owned by the three national credit reporting companies. We alleged
in the lawsuit violations of antitrust laws, unfair competitive practices and false advertising,
trademark infringement, and breach of contract. We sought injunctive relief and compensatory
damages. On June 6, 2008, we entered into a settlement agreement with Equifax Inc. and Equifax
Information Services LLC, and on June 13, 2008, Equifax Inc. and Equifax Information Services LLC
were formally dismissed from this lawsuit. On February 9, 2009, the Court granted our motions to
strike counterclaims the remaining defendants had attempted to bring against us in the case,
allowing them to assert only a counterclaim for trademark cancellation. On July 24, 2009, the
Court issued a summary judgment order, which limited the claims to be tried. The Court dismissed
our antitrust, contract, and certain false advertising claims. The Court allowed our trademark
infringement, unfair competition, and passing off claims to proceed to trial. After a three-week
trial on these claims, the jury ruled in the defendants favor on November 20, 2009. We filed
post-trial motions to address issues in the trial, and the defendants filed post-trial motions
seeking payment of certain attorneys fees and costs. On May 10, 2010, the Court issued a ruling
denying our post-trial motions and substantially denying defendants motions for attorneysfees and
costs (other than an award to TransUnion LLC for certain fees associated with our contract claims).
On May 17, 2010, we entered into a settlement agreement with TransUnion LLC pursuant to which,
among many other terms, TransUnion LLC released all claims to the fee award and was dismissed from
the lawsuit. On June 4, 2010, we filed a notice of appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Eight Circuit setting forth the issues on which we are appealing the results from the district
court, including the dismissal of our antitrust claims and certain rulings fundamental to our
trademark and false advertising claims. On June 16, 2010, the remaining defendants, Experian
Information Solutions, Inc. and VantageScore Solutions LLC, filed a notice of appeal regarding the
denial of their motions for attorneys fees. Briefing on the appeals is expected to be complete in
December 2010, and rulings are expected in mid-2011.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Risks Related to Our Business
We have expanded the pursuit of our Decision Management strategy, and we may not be successful,
which could cause our growth prospects and results of operations to suffer.
We have expanded the pursuit of our business objective to become a leader in helping
businesses automate and improve decisions across their enterprises, an approach that we commonly
refer to as Decision Management, or DM. Our DM strategy is designed to enable us to increase our
business by selling multiple products to clients, as well as to enable the development of custom
client solutions that may lead to opportunities to develop new proprietary scores or other new
proprietary products. The market may be unreceptive to this general DM business approach,
including being unreceptive to purchasing multiple products from us or unreceptive to our
customized solutions. If our DM strategy is not successful, we may not be able to grow our
business, growth may occur more slowly than we anticipate or our revenues and profits may decline.
We derive a substantial portion of our revenues from a small number of products and services, and
if the market does not continue to accept these products and services, our revenues will decline.
As we implement our DM strategy, we expect that revenues derived from our scoring solutions,
account management solutions, fraud solutions, originations and collections and recovery solutions
will continue to account for a substantial portion of our total revenues for the foreseeable
future. Our revenues will decline if the market does not continue to accept these products and
services. Factors that might affect the market acceptance of these products and services include
the following:
|
|
|
changes in the business analytics industry; |
36
|
|
|
changes in technology; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to obtain or use key data for our products; |
|
|
|
|
saturation or contraction of market demand; |
|
|
|
|
loss of key customers; |
|
|
|
|
industry consolidation; |
|
|
|
|
failure to execute our selling approach; and |
|
|
|
|
inability to successfully sell our products in new vertical markets. |
If we are unable to access new markets or develop new distribution channels, our business and
growth prospects could suffer.
We expect that part of the growth that we seek to achieve through our DM strategy will be
derived from the sale of DM products and service solutions in industries and markets we do not
currently serve. We also expect to grow our business by delivering our DM solutions through
additional distribution channels. If we fail to penetrate these industries and markets to the
degree we anticipate utilizing our DM strategy, or if we fail to develop additional distribution
channels, we may not be able to grow our business, growth may occur more slowly than we anticipate
or our revenues and profits may decline.
If we are unable to develop successful new products or if we experience defects, failures and
delays associated with the introduction of new products, our business could suffer serious harm.
Our growth and the success of our DM strategy depend upon our ability to develop and sell new
products or suites of products. If we are unable to develop new products, or if we are not
successful in introducing new products, we may not be able to grow our business, or growth may
occur more slowly than we anticipate. In addition, significant undetected errors or delays in new
products or new versions of products may affect market acceptance of our products and could harm
our business, financial condition or results of operations. In the past, we have experienced
delays while developing and introducing new products and product enhancements, primarily due to
difficulties developing models, acquiring data and adapting to particular operating environments.
We have also experienced errors or bugs in our software products, despite testing prior to
release of the products. Software errors in our products could affect the ability of our products
to work with other hardware or software products, could delay the development or release of new
products or new versions of products and could adversely affect market acceptance of our products.
Errors or defects in our products that are significant, or are perceived to be significant, could
result in rejection of our products, damage to our reputation, loss of revenues, diversion of
development resources, an increase in product liability claims, and increases in service and
support costs and warranty claims.
We rely on relatively few customers, as well as our contracts with the three major credit
reporting agencies, for a significant portion of our revenues and profits. Certain of our large
customers have been negatively impacted by the recent financial crisis. If these customers
continue to be negatively impacted, or if the terms of these relationships otherwise change, our
revenues and operating results could decline.
Most of our customers are relatively large enterprises, such as banks, credit card processors,
insurance companies, healthcare firms and retailers. As a result, many of our customers and
potential customers are significantly larger than we are and may have sufficient bargaining power
to demand reduced prices and favorable nonstandard terms.
In addition, since mid-2007, global financial markets have suffered substantial stress,
volatility, illiquidity and disruption. These forces reached unprecedented levels in the fall of
2008, resulting in the bankruptcy or acquisition of, or government assistance to, several major
domestic and international financial institutions which are customers of our company. The
potential for increased and continuing economic disruption presents considerable risks to our
business, including potential bankruptcies or credit deterioration of financial institutions with
which we have substantial relationships. Further deterioration or a continuation of the market
conditions experienced since the fall of 2008 is likely to lead to a continued decline in the
volume of transactions that we execute for our customers.
We also derive a substantial portion of our revenues and operating income from our contracts
with the three major credit reporting agencies, TransUnion, Equifax and Experian, and other parties
that distribute our products to certain markets. We are also currently involved in litigation with
Experian arising from their development and marketing of credit scoring products competitive with
our products. We have asserted various claims, including unfair competition, antitrust, and breach
of contract against this credit reporting agency and its joint venture entity, VantageScore, LLC.
This litigation could have a material adverse effect on our relationship with one or more of the
major credit reporting agencies, or with major customers.
37
The loss of or a significant change in a relationship with a major customer, the loss of or a
significant change in a relationship with one of the major credit reporting agencies with respect
to their distribution of our products or with respect to our myFICO® offerings, the loss
of or a significant change in a relationship with a significant third-party distributor or the
delay of significant revenues from these sources, could have a material adverse effect on our
revenues and results of operations.
We rely on relationships with third parties for marketing, distribution and certain services. If
we experience difficulties in these relationships, our future revenues may be adversely affected.
Most of our products rely on distributors, and we intend to continue to market and distribute
our products through existing and future distributor relationships. Our Scores segment relies on,
among others, TransUnion, Equifax and Experian. Failure of our existing and future distributors to
generate significant revenues, demands by such distributors to change the terms on which they offer
our products or our failure to establish additional distribution or sales and marketing alliances
could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
In addition, certain of our distributors presently compete with us and may compete with us in the
future either by developing competitive products themselves or by distributing competitive
offerings. For example, TransUnion, Equifax and Experian have developed a credit scoring product
to compete directly with our products and are collectively attempting to sell the product.
Competition from distributors or other sales and marketing partners could significantly harm sales
of our products and services.
If we do not engage in acquisition activity to the extent we have in the past, we may be unable to
increase our revenues at historical growth rates.
Our historical revenue growth has been augmented by numerous acquisitions, and we anticipate
that acquisitions may continue to be an important part of our revenue growth. Our future revenue
growth rate may decline if we do not make acquisitions of similar size and at a comparable rate as
in the past.
If we engage in acquisitions, significant investments in new businesses, or divestitures of
existing businesses, we will incur a variety of risks, any of which may adversely affect our
business.
We have made in the past, and may make in the future, acquisitions of, or significant
investments in, businesses that offer complementary products, services and technologies. Any
acquisitions or investments will be accompanied by the risks commonly encountered in acquisitions
of businesses, which may include:
|
|
|
failure to achieve the financial and strategic goals for the acquired and combined
business; |
|
|
|
|
overpayment for the acquired companies or assets; |
|
|
|
|
difficulty assimilating the operations and personnel of the acquired businesses; |
|
|
|
|
product liability and other exposure associated with acquired businesses or the sale of
their products; |
|
|
|
|
disruption of our ongoing business; |
|
|
|
|
dilution of our existing stockholders and earnings per share; |
|
|
|
|
unanticipated liabilities, legal risks and costs; |
|
|
|
|
retention of key personnel; |
|
|
|
|
distraction of management from our ongoing business; and |
|
|
|
|
impairment of relationships with employees and customers as a result of integration of
new management personnel. |
We have also divested ourselves of businesses in the past and may do so again in the future.
Any divestitures will be accompanied by the risks commonly encountered in the sale of businesses,
which may include:
|
|
|
disruption of our ongoing business; |
|
|
|
|
reductions of our revenues or earnings per share; |
|
|
|
|
unanticipated liabilities, legal risks and costs; |
|
|
|
|
the potential loss of key personnel; |
|
|
|
|
distraction of management from our ongoing business; and |
|
|
|
|
impairment of relationships with employees and customers as a result of migrating a
business to new owners. |
These risks could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations,
particularly if they occur in the context of a significant acquisition. Acquisitions of businesses
having a significant presence outside the U.S. will increase our exposure to the risks of
conducting operations in international markets.
38
Our reengineering initiative may not be successful which could cause our growth prospects and
profitability to suffer.
As part of our management approach, we implemented a reengineering initiative designed to grow
revenues through strategic resource allocation and improve profitability through cost reductions.
Periodically, implementation of our reengineering initiative may reduce our revenues as a result of
our exit from non-strategic product lines. Our reengineering initiative may not be successful as a
result of our failure to reduce expenses at the anticipated level, our inability to exit all
non-strategic product lines included in the initiative, or a lower, or no, positive impact on
revenues from strategic resource allocation. If our reengineering initiative is not successful,
our revenues, results of operations and business may suffer.
The occurrence of certain negative events may cause fluctuations in our stock price.
The market price of our common stock may be volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations
due to a number of factors, including variations in our revenues and operating results. We believe
that you should not rely on period-to-period comparisons of financial results as an indication of
future performance. Because many of our operating expenses are fixed and will not be affected by
short-term fluctuations in revenues, short-term fluctuations in revenues may significantly impact
operating results. Additional factors that may cause our stock price to fluctuate include the
following:
|
|
|
variability in demand from our existing customers; |
|
|
|
|
failure to meet the expectations of market analysts; |
|
|
|
|
changes in recommendations by market analysts; |
|
|
|
|
the lengthy and variable sales cycle of many products, combined with the relatively large
size of orders for our products, increases the likelihood of short-term fluctuation in
revenues; |
|
|
|
|
consumer dissatisfaction with, or problems caused by, the performance of our products; |
|
|
|
|
the timing of new product announcements and introductions in comparison with our
competitors; |
|
|
|
|
the level of our operating expenses; |
|
|
|
|
changes in competitive and other conditions in the consumer credit, banking and insurance
industries; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in domestic and international economic conditions, including a continuation
of the substantial disruption currently being experienced by the global financial markets; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to complete large installations on schedule and within budget; |
|
|
|
|
acquisition-related expenses and charges; and |
|
|
|
|
timing of orders for and deliveries of software systems. |
In addition, the financial markets have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations
that have particularly affected the stock prices of many technology companies and financial
services companies, and these fluctuations sometimes have been unrelated to the operating
performance of these companies. Broad market fluctuations, as well as industry-specific and
general economic conditions may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Due to ongoing uncertainty in economic conditions and weakness in financial credit markets,
the fair value of our businesses has declined. If difficult market and economic conditions
continue over a sustained period, we may experience a further decline in the fair value of one or
more of our businesses from fiscal 2009 year-end levels. Such further declines in fair value may
require us to record an impairment charge related to goodwill, which could adversely affect our
results of operations, stock price and business.
Our products have long and variable sales cycles. If we do not accurately predict these cycles,
we may not forecast our financial results accurately, and our stock price could be adversely
affected.
We experience difficulty in forecasting our revenues accurately because the length of our
sales cycles makes it difficult for us to predict the quarter in which sales will occur. In
addition, our selling approach is complex because it emphasizes the sale of complete DM solutions
involving multiple products or services across our customers organizations. This makes
forecasting of revenues in any given period more difficult. As a result of our sales approach and
lengthening sales cycles, revenues and operating results may vary significantly from period to
period. For example, the sales cycle for licensing our products typically ranges from 60 days to
18 months. Customers are often cautious in making decisions to acquire our products, because
purchasing our products typically involves a significant commitment of capital, and may involve
shifts by the customer to a new software and/or hardware platform or changes in the customers
operational procedures. Since our DM strategy contemplates the sale of multiple decision solutions
to a customer, expenditures by any given customer are expected to be larger than with our prior
sales approach. This may cause customers, particularly those experiencing financial stress, to make
purchasing decisions more cautiously. Delays in completing sales can arise while customers
complete their internal procedures to approve large capital expenditures and test and accept our
applications.
39
Consequently, we face difficulty predicting the quarter in which sales to expected customers
will occur and experience fluctuations in our revenues and operating results. If we are unable to
accurately forecast our revenues, our stock price could be adversely affected.
We typically have revenue-generating transactions concentrated in the final weeks of a quarter,
which may prevent accurate forecasting of our financial results and cause our stock price to
decline.
Large portions of our software license agreements are consummated in the weeks immediately
preceding quarter end. Before these agreements are consummated, we create and rely on forecasted
revenues for planning, modeling and earnings guidance. Forecasts, however, are only estimates and
actual results may vary for a particular quarter or longer periods of time. Consequently,
significant discrepancies between actual and forecasted results could limit our ability to plan,
budget or provide accurate guidance, which could adversely affect our stock price. Any
publicly-stated revenue or earnings projections are subject to this risk.
The failure to recruit and retain additional qualified personnel could hinder our ability to
successfully manage our business.
Our DM strategy and our future success will depend in large part on our ability to attract and
retain experienced sales, consulting, research and development, marketing, technical support and
management personnel. The complexity of our products requires highly trained customer service and
technical support personnel to assist customers with product installation and deployment. The
labor market for these individuals is very competitive due to the limited number of people
available with the necessary technical skills and understanding and may become more competitive
with general market and economic improvement. We cannot be certain that our compensation
strategies will be perceived as competitive by current or prospective employees. This could impair
our ability to recruit and retain personnel. We have experienced difficulty in recruiting
qualified personnel, especially technical, sales and consulting personnel, and we may need
additional staff to support new customers and/or increased customer needs. We may also recruit
skilled technical professionals from other countries to work in the United States. Limitations
imposed by immigration laws in the United States and abroad and the availability of visas in the
countries where we do business could hinder our ability to attract necessary qualified personnel
and harm our business and future operating results. There is a risk that even if we invest
significant resources in attempting to attract, train and retain qualified personnel, we will not
succeed in our efforts, and our business could be harmed. The failure of the value of our stock to
appreciate may adversely affect our ability to use equity and equity based incentive plans to
attract and retain personnel, and may require us to use alternative and more expensive forms of
compensation for this purpose.
The failure to obtain certain forms of model construction data from our customers or others could
harm our business.
We must develop or obtain a reliable source of sufficient amounts of current and statistically
relevant data to analyze transactions and update our products. In most cases, these data must be
periodically updated and refreshed to enable our products to continue to work effectively in a
changing environment. We do not own or control much of the data that we require, most of which is
collected privately and maintained in proprietary databases. Customers and key business alliances
provide us with the data we require to analyze transactions, report results and build new models.
Our DM strategy depends in part upon our ability to access new forms of data to develop custom and
proprietary analytic tools. If we fail to maintain sufficient data sourcing relationships with our
customers and business alliances, or if they decline to provide such data due to legal privacy
concerns, competition concerns, prohibitions or a lack of permission from their customers, we could
lose access to required data and our products, and the development of new products might become
less effective. Third parties have asserted copyright interests in these data, and these
assertions, if successful, could prevent us from using these data. Any interruption of our supply
of data could seriously harm our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We will continue to rely upon proprietary technology rights, and if we are unable to protect them,
our business could be harmed.
Our success depends, in part, upon our proprietary technology and other intellectual property
rights. To date, we have relied primarily on a combination of copyright, patent, trade secret, and
trademark laws, and nondisclosure and other contractual restrictions on copying and distribution to
protect our proprietary technology. This protection of our proprietary technology is limited, and
our proprietary technology could be used by others without our consent. In addition, patents may
not be issued with respect to our pending or future patent applications, and our patents may not be
upheld as valid or may not prevent the development of competitive products. Any disclosure, loss,
invalidity of, or failure to protect our intellectual property could negatively impact our
competitive position, and ultimately, our business. There can be no assurance that our protection
of our intellectual property rights in the United States or abroad will be adequate or that others,
including our competitors, will not use our proprietary technology without our consent.
Furthermore, litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect
our trade secrets, or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others.
Such litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could harm our
business, financial condition or results of operations.
40
Some of our technologies were developed under research projects conducted under agreements
with various U.S. government agencies or subcontractors. Although we have commercial rights to
these technologies, the U.S. government typically retains ownership of intellectual property rights
and licenses in the technologies developed by us under these contracts, and in some cases can
terminate our rights in these technologies if we fail to commercialize them on a timely basis.
Under these contracts with the U.S. government, the results of research may be made public by the
government, limiting our competitive advantage with respect to future products based on our
research.
If we are subject to infringement claims, it could harm our business.
We expect that products in the industry segments in which we compete, including software
products, will increasingly be subject to claims of patent and other intellectual property
infringement as the number of products and competitors in our industry segments grow. We may need
to defend claims that our products infringe intellectual property rights, and as a result we may:
|
|
|
incur significant defense costs or substantial damages; |
|
|
|
|
be required to cease the use or sale of infringing products; |
|
|
|
|
expend significant resources to develop or license a substitute non-infringing
technology; |
|
|
|
|
discontinue the use of some technology; or |
|
|
|
|
be required to obtain a license under the intellectual property rights of the third party
claiming infringement, which license may not be available or might require substantial
royalties or license fees that would reduce our margins. |
Breaches of security, or the perception that e-commerce is not secure, could harm our business.
Our business requires the appropriate and secure utilization of consumer and other sensitive
information. Internet-based electronic commerce requires the secure transmission of confidential
information over public networks, and several of our products are accessed through the Internet,
including our consumer services accessible through the www.myfico.com website. Security breaches
in connection with the delivery of our products and services, including products and services
utilizing the Internet, or well-publicized security breaches, and the trend toward broad consumer
and general public notification of such incidents, could significantly harm our business, financial
condition or results of operations. We cannot be certain that advances in criminal capabilities,
discovery of new vulnerabilities, attempts to exploit vulnerabilities in our systems, data thefts,
physical system or network break-ins or inappropriate access, or other developments will not
compromise or breach the technology protecting the networks that access our net-sourced products,
consumer services and proprietary database information.
Protection from system interruptions is important to our business. If we experience a sustained
interruption of our telecommunication systems, it could harm our business.
Systems or network interruptions could delay and disrupt our ability to develop, deliver or
maintain our products and services, causing harm to our business and reputation and resulting in
loss of customers or revenue. These interruptions can include fires, floods, earthquakes, power
losses, equipment failures and other events beyond our control.
Risks Related to Our Industry
Our ability to increase our revenues will depend to some extent upon introducing new products and
services. If the marketplace does not accept these new products and services, our revenues may
decline.
We have a significant share of the available market in portions of our Scores segment and for
certain services in our Applications segment, specifically, the markets for account management
services at credit card processors and credit card fraud detection software. To increase our
revenues, we must enhance and improve existing products and continue to introduce new products and
new versions of existing products that keep pace with technological developments, satisfy
increasingly sophisticated customer requirements and achieve market acceptance. We believe much of
the future growth of our business and the success of our DM strategy will rest on our ability to
continue to expand into newer markets for our products and services. Such areas are relatively new
to our product development and sales and marketing personnel. Products that we plan to market in
the future are in various stages of development. We cannot assure you that the marketplace will
accept these products. If our current or potential customers are not willing to switch to or adopt
our new products and services, either as a result of the quality of these products and services or
due to other factors, such as economic conditions, our revenues will decrease.
41
If we fail to keep up with rapidly changing technologies, our products could become less
competitive or obsolete.
In our markets, technology changes rapidly, and there are continuous improvements in computer
hardware, network operating systems, programming tools, programming languages, operating systems,
database technology and the use of the Internet. If we fail to enhance our current products and
develop new products in response to changes in technology or industry standards, or if we fail to
bring product enhancements or new product developments to market quickly enough, our products could
rapidly become less competitive or obsolete. For example, the rapid growth of the Internet
environment creates new opportunities, risks and uncertainties for businesses, such as ours, which
develop software that must also be designed to operate in Internet, intranet and other online
environments. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to:
|
|
|
innovate by internally developing new and competitive technologies; |
|
|
|
|
use leading third-party technologies effectively; |
|
|
|
|
continue to develop our technical expertise; |
|
|
|
|
anticipate and effectively respond to changing customer needs; |
|
|
|
|
initiate new product introductions in a way that minimizes the impact of customers
delaying purchases of existing products in anticipation of new product releases; and |
|
|
|
|
influence and respond to emerging industry standards and other technological changes. |
If our competitors introduce new products and pricing strategies, it could decrease our product
sales and market share, or could pressure us to reduce our product prices in a manner that reduces
our margins.
We may not be able to compete successfully against our competitors, and this inability could
impair our capacity to sell our products. The market for business analytics is new, rapidly
evolving and highly competitive, and we expect competition in this market to persist and intensify.
Our regional and global competitors vary in size and in the scope of the products and services
they offer, and include:
|
|
|
in-house analytic and systems developers; |
|
|
|
|
scoring model builders; |
|
|
|
|
enterprise resource planning (ERP) and customer relationship management (CRM) packaged
solutions providers; |
|
|
|
|
business intelligence solutions providers; |
|
|
|
|
credit report and credit score providers; |
|
|
|
|
business process management solution providers; |
|
|
|
|
process modeling tools providers; |
|
|
|
|
automated application processing services providers; |
|
|
|
|
data vendors; |
|
|
|
|
neural network developers and artificial intelligence system builders; |
|
|
|
|
third-party professional services and consulting organizations; |
|
|
|
|
account/workflow management software providers; and |
|
|
|
|
software tools companies supplying modeling, rules, or analytic development tools. |
We expect to experience additional competition from other established and emerging companies,
as well as from other technologies. For example, certain of our fraud solutions products compete
against other methods of preventing credit card fraud, such as credit cards that contain the
cardholders photograph, smart cards, cardholder verification and authentication solutions and
other card authorization techniques. Many of our anticipated competitors have greater financial,
technical, marketing, professional services and other resources than we do, and industry
consolidation is creating even larger competitors in many of our markets. As a result, our
competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in
customer requirements. They may also be able to devote greater resources than we can to develop,
promote and sell their products. Many of these companies have extensive customer relationships,
including relationships with many of our current and potential customers. Furthermore, new
competitors or alliances among competitors may emerge and rapidly gain significant market share.
For example, TransUnion, Equifax and Experian have formed an alliance that has developed a credit
scoring product competitive with our products. If we are unable to respond as quickly or
effectively to changes in customer requirements as our competition, our ability to expand our
business and sell our products will be negatively affected.
Our competitors may be able to sell products competitive to ours at lower prices individually or as
part of integrated suites of several related products. This ability may cause our customers to
purchase products that directly compete with our products from our competitors. Price reductions
by our competitors could negatively impact our margins, and could also harm our ability to obtain
new long-term contracts and renewals of existing long-term contracts on favorable terms.
42
Legislation that is enacted by the U.S. Congress, the states, Canadian provinces, and other
countries, and government regulations that apply to us or to our customers may expose us to
liability, affect our ability to compete in certain markets, limit the profitability of or demand
for our products, or render our products obsolete. If these laws and regulations require us to
change our current products and services, it could adversely affect our business and results of
operations.
Legislation and governmental regulation affect how our business is conducted and, in some
cases, subject us to the possibility of future lawsuits arising from our products and services.
Globally, legislation and governmental regulation also influence our current and prospective
customers activities, as well as their expectations and needs in relation to our products and
services. Both our core businesses and our newer initiatives are affected globally by federal,
regional, provincial, state and other jurisdictional regulations, including those in the following
significant regulatory areas:
|
|
|
Use of data by creditors and consumer reporting agencies. Examples in the U.S. include
the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act
(FACTA), which amends FCRA, and certain proposed regulations and studies mandated by
FACTA, under consideration; |
|
|
|
|
Laws and regulations that limit the use of credit scoring models such as state mortgage
trigger laws, state inquiries laws, state insurance restrictions on the use of credit
based insurance scores, and the Consumer Credit Directive in the European Union. |
|
|
|
|
Fair lending laws, such as the Truth In Lending Act (TILA) and Regulation Z, and the
Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) and Regulation B. |
|
|
|
|
Privacy and security laws and regulations that limit the use and disclosure of personally
identifiable information or require security procedures, including but not limited to the
provisions of the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999, also known as the Gramm
Leach Bliley Act (GLBA); FACTA; the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of
1996 (HIPAA); the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools
Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA Patriot Act); identity
theft, file freezing, security breach notification and similar state privacy laws; |
|
|
|
|
Extension of credit to consumers through the Electronic Fund Transfers Act, as well as
nongovernmental VISA and MasterCard electronic payment standards; |
|
|
|
|
Regulations applicable to secondary market participants such as Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac that could have an impact on our products; |
|
|
|
|
Insurance laws and regulations applicable to our insurance clients and their use of our
insurance products and services; |
|
|
|
|
The application or extension of consumer protection laws, including, laws governing the
use of the Internet and telemarketing, advertising, endorsements and testimonials and credit
repair; |
|
|
|
|
Laws and regulations applicable to operations in other countries, for example, the
European Unions Privacy Directive and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; |
|
|
|
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) requirements to maintain and verify internal process controls,
including controls for material event awareness and notification; |
|
|
|
|
The implementation of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 by federal
regulators to manage the financial crisis in the United States; |
|
|
|
|
Financial regulatory reform stemming from the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act; |
|
|
|
|
Laws and regulations regarding export controls as they apply to FICO products delivered
in non-US countries. |
In making credit evaluations of consumers, or in performing fraud screening or user
authentication, our customers are subject to requirements of multiple jurisdictions, which may
impose onerous and contradictory requirements. Privacy legislation such as GLBA or the European
Unions Privacy Directive may also affect the nature and extent of the products or services that we
can provide to customers, as well as our ability to collect, monitor and disseminate information
subject to privacy protection. In addition to existing regulation, changes in legislative,
judicial, regulatory or consumer environments could harm our business, financial condition or
results of operations. These regulations and amendments to them could affect the demand for or
profitability of some of our products, including scoring and consumer products. New regulations
pertaining to financial institutions could cause them to pursue new strategies, reducing the demand
for our products.
In response to recent market disruptions, legislators and financial regulators implemented a
number of mechanisms designed to add stability to the financial markets, including the provision of
direct and indirect assistance to distressed financial institutions, assistance by the banking
authorities in arranging acquisitions of weakened banks and broker-dealers, and implementation of
programs by the Federal Reserve to provide liquidity to the commercial paper markets. The overall
effects of these and other legislative and regulatory efforts on the financial markets are
uncertain, and they may not have the intended stabilization effects. Should these or other
legislative or regulatory initiatives fail to stabilize and add liquidity to the financial markets,
our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially and
adversely affected. Whether or not legislative or regulatory initiatives or other
efforts designed to address recent economic conditions successfully stabilize and add
liquidity to the financial markets, we may need
43
to modify our strategies, businesses or operations,
and we may incur additional costs in order to compete in a changed business environment.
Our revenues depend, to a great extent, upon conditions in the banking and insurance industries.
If our clients industries continue to experience a downturn, it will likely harm our business,
financial condition or results of operations.
During fiscal 2009, 76% of our revenues were derived from sales of products and services to
the banking and insurance industries. Since mid-2007, global credit and other financial markets
have suffered substantial stress, volatility, illiquidity and disruption. These forces reached
unprecedented levels in the fall of 2008, resulting in the bankruptcy or acquisition of, or
government assistance to, several major domestic and international financial institutions. The
recent market developments and the potential for increased and continuing disruptions present
considerable risks to our businesses and operations. These risks include potential bankruptcies or
credit deterioration of financial institutions, many of which are our customers. Further
deterioration or a continuation of recent market conditions is likely to lead to a continued
decline in the revenue we receive from financial and other institutions.
While the rate of account growth in the U.S. bankcard industry has been slowing and many of
our large institutional customers have consolidated in recent years, we have generated most of our
revenue growth from our bankcard-related scoring and account management businesses by selling and
cross-selling our products and services to large banks and other credit issuers. As the banking
industry continues to experience contraction in the number of participating institutions, we may
have fewer opportunities for revenue growth due to reduced or changing demand for our products and
services that support customer acquisition programs of our customers. In addition, industry
contraction could affect the base of recurring revenues derived from contracts in which we are paid
on a per-transaction basis as formerly separate customers combine their operations under one
contract. There can be no assurance that we will be able to prevent future revenue contraction or
effectively promote future revenue growth in our businesses.
While we are attempting to expand our sales of consumer credit, banking and insurance products
and services into international markets, the risks are greater as these markets are also
experiencing substantial disruption and we are less well-known in them.
Risk Related to External Conditions
Continuing material adverse developments in global economic conditions, or the occurrence of
certain other world events, could affect demand for our products and services and harm our
business.
Purchases of technology products and services and decisioning solutions are subject to adverse
economic conditions. When an economy is struggling, companies in many industries delay or reduce
technology purchases, and we experience softened demand for our decisioning solutions and other
products and services. Since mid-2007, global credit and other financial markets have suffered
substantial stress, volatility, illiquidity and disruption. These forces reached unprecedented
levels in the fall of 2008, resulting in the bankruptcy or acquisition of, or government assistance
to, several major domestic and international financial institutions. The widespread economic
downturn has also negatively affected the businesses and purchasing decisions of companies in the
other industries we serve. These recent market developments and the potential for increased and
continuing disruptions present considerable risks to our businesses and operations. If global
economic conditions continue to experience stress and negative volatility, or if there is an
escalation in regional or global conflicts or terrorism, we will likely experience reductions in
the number of available customers and in capital expenditures by our remaining customers, longer
sales cycles, deferral or delay of purchase commitments for our products and increased price
competition, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations and liquidity.
Whether or not legislative or regulatory initiatives or other efforts successfully stabilize
and add liquidity to the financial markets, we may need to modify our strategies, businesses or
operations, and we may incur additional costs in order to compete in a changed business
environment. Given the volatile nature of the current economic downturn and the uncertainties
underlying efforts to mitigate or reverse the downturn, we may not timely anticipate or manage
existing, new or additional risks, as well as contingencies or developments, which may include
regulatory developments and trends in new products and services. Our failure to do so could
materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and
prospects.
In operations outside the United States, we are subject to unique risks that may harm our
business, financial condition or results of operations.
A growing portion of our revenues is derived from international sales. During fiscal 2009,
32% of our revenues were derived from business outside the United States. As part of our growth
strategy, we plan to continue to pursue opportunities outside the United
States, including opportunities in countries with economic systems that are in early stages of
development and that may not mature
44
sufficiently to result in growth for our business.
Accordingly, our future operating results could be negatively affected by a variety of factors
arising out of international commerce, some of which are beyond our control. These factors
include:
|
|
|
general economic and political conditions in countries where we sell our products and
services; |
|
|
|
|
difficulty in staffing and efficiently managing our operations in multiple geographic
locations and in various countries; |
|
|
|
|
effects of a variety of foreign laws and regulations, including restrictions on access to
personal information; |
|
|
|
|
import and export licensing requirements; |
|
|
|
|
longer payment cycles; |
|
|
|
|
reduced protection for intellectual property rights; |
|
|
|
|
currency fluctuations; |
|
|
|
|
changes in tariffs and other trade barriers; and |
|
|
|
|
difficulties and delays in translating products and related documentation into foreign
languages. |
There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully address each of these
challenges in the near term. Additionally, some of our business will be conducted in currencies
other than the U.S. dollar. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are not currently
material to our cash flows, financial position or results of operations. However, an increase in
our foreign revenues could subject us to increased foreign currency transaction risks in the
future.
In addition to the risk of depending on international sales, we have risks incurred in having
research and development personnel located in various international locations. We currently have a
substantial portion of our product development staff in international locations, some of which have
political and developmental risks. If such risks materialize, our business could be damaged.
Our anti-takeover defenses could make it difficult for another company to acquire control of FICO,
thereby limiting the demand for our securities by certain types of purchasers or the price
investors are willing to pay for our stock.
Certain provisions of our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, could make a
merger, tender offer or proxy contest involving us difficult, even if such events would be
beneficial to the interests of our stockholders. These provisions include adopting a Shareholder
Rights Agreement, commonly known as a poison pill, and giving our board the ability to issue
preferred stock and determine the rights and designations of the preferred stock at any time
without stockholder approval. The rights of the holders of our common stock will be subject to,
and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any preferred stock that may be
issued in the future. The issuance of preferred stock, while providing flexibility in connection
with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could have the effect of making it more
difficult for a third party to acquire, or discouraging a third party from acquiring, a majority of
our outstanding voting stock. These factors and certain provisions of the Delaware General
Corporation Law may have the effect of deterring hostile takeovers or otherwise delaying or
preventing changes in control or changes in our management, including transactions in which our
stockholders might otherwise receive a premium over the fair market value of our common stock.
If we experience changes in tax laws or adverse outcomes resulting from examination of our income
tax returns, it could adversely affect our results of operations.
We are subject to federal and state income taxes in the United States and in certain foreign
jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income
taxes. Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by changes in tax laws, by our
ability to generate taxable income in foreign jurisdictions in order to utilize foreign tax losses,
and by the valuation of our deferred tax assets. In addition, we are subject to the examination of
our income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. We regularly
assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from such examinations to determine the
adequacy of our provision for income taxes. There can be no assurance that the outcomes from such
examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
45
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Dollar Value of |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
Shares that May |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Yet Be |
|
|
Shares |
|
Average |
|
Announced |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Purchased |
|
Price Paid |
|
Plans or |
|
Under the Plans |
Period |
|
(2) |
|
per Share |
|
Programs |
|
or Programs |
April 1, 2010 through April 30, 2010 |
|
|
215,367 |
|
|
$ |
25.73 |
|
|
|
211,024 |
|
|
$ |
66,687,917 |
|
May 1, 2010 through May 31, 2010 |
|
|
1,692,200 |
|
|
$ |
22.44 |
|
|
|
1,692,200 |
|
|
$ |
28,718,275 |
|
June 1, 2010 through June 30, 2010 |
|
|
1,703,551 |
|
|
$ |
22.69 |
|
|
|
1,700,800 |
|
|
$ |
233,183,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,611,118 |
|
|
$ |
22.75 |
|
|
|
3,604,024 |
|
|
$ |
233,183,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In June 2010, our Board of Directors approved a common stock repurchase program that
allows us to purchase shares of our common stock up to an aggregate cost of $250.0 million
in the open market or through negotiated transactions. The June 2010 program does not have
a fixed expiration date. This program replaced a similar plan approved in November 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 7,094 shares delivered in satisfaction of the tax withholding obligations
resulting from the vesting of restricted stock units held by employees during the quarter
ended June 30, 2010. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
3.1 |
|
Bylaws of Fair Isaac Corporation. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Companys Form 10-Q filed on February 8, 2010.) |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Composite Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Fair Isaac Corporation.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Form 10-Q filed on February
8, 2010.) |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Fair Isaac Corporation 1992 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended effective May 4, 2010. |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of CEO. |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of CFO. |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Section 1350 Certification of CEO. |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Section 1350 Certification of CFO. |
|
|
|
101 |
|
The following materials from Fair Isaac Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, formatted in Extensive Business Reporting
Language (XBRL), (i) condensed consolidated balance sheets, (ii) condensed
consolidated statements of income, (iii) condensed consolidated statement of stockholders
equity and comprehensive income, (iv) condensed consolidated statements of cash flows,
and (v) the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements. |
46
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
|
|
DATE: August 6, 2010 |
By |
/s/ THOMAS A. BRADLEY
|
|
|
|
Thomas A. Bradley |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(for Registrant as duly authorized officer and
as Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
DATE: August 6, 2010 |
By |
/s/ MICHAEL J. PUNG
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Pung |
|
|
|
Vice President, Finance
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
47
EXHIBIT INDEX
To Fair Isaac Corporation Report On Form 10-Q
For The Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
3.1 |
|
Bylaws of Fair Isaac Corporation |
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Composite Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Fair Isaac Corporation |
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Fair Isaac Corporation 1992 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended |
|
Filed Electronically |
|
|
effective May 4, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of CEO. |
|
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of CFO. |
|
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Section 1350 Certification of CEO. |
|
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Section 1350 Certification of CFO. |
|
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
The following materials from Fair Isaac Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, formatted in Extensive
Business Reporting Language (XBRL), (i) condensed consolidated
balance sheets, (ii) condensed consolidated statements of income, (iii)
condensed consolidated statement of stockholders equity and
comprehensive income, (iv) condensed consolidated statements of cash
flows, and (v) the notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements. |
|
Filed Electronically |
48
exv10w1
Exhibit 10.1
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
1992 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
As amended effective May 4, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
ARTICLE 1. INTRODUCTION |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 2. ADMINISTRATION |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 Committee Composition |
|
|
5 |
|
2.2 Committee Responsibilities |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 3. SHARES AVAILABLE FOR GRANTS |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 Basic Limitation |
|
|
6 |
|
3.2 Additional Shares |
|
|
6 |
|
3.3 Dividend Equivalents |
|
|
6 |
|
3.4 Outside Director Option Limitations |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 4. ELIGIBILITY |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 General Rules |
|
|
6 |
|
4.2 Outside Directors |
|
|
6 |
|
4.3 Ten-Percent Stockholders |
|
|
8 |
|
4.4 Limitation on Option Grants |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 5. OPTIONS |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 Stock Option Agreement |
|
|
8 |
|
5.2 Awards Nontransferable |
|
|
8 |
|
5.3 Number of Shares |
|
|
8 |
|
5.4 Exercise Price |
|
|
8 |
|
5.5 Exercisability and Term |
|
|
9 |
|
5.6 Effect of Change in Control |
|
|
9 |
|
5.7 Modification or Assumption of Options |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 6. PAYMENT FOR OPTION SHARES |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 General Rule |
|
|
9 |
|
6.2 Surrender of Stock |
|
|
9 |
|
6.3 Exercise/Sale |
|
|
10 |
|
6.4 Exercise/Pledge |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-2-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
6.5 Other Forms of Payment |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 7. STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.1 Grant of SARs |
|
|
10 |
|
7.2 Exercise of SARs |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 8. RESTRICTED SHARES AND STOCK UNITS |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.1 Time, Amount and Form of Awards |
|
|
11 |
|
8.2 Payment for Awards |
|
|
11 |
|
8.3 Vesting Conditions |
|
|
11 |
|
8.4 Form and Time of Settlement of Stock Units |
|
|
11 |
|
8.5 Death of Recipient |
|
|
11 |
|
8.6 Creditors Rights |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 9. VOTING AND DIVIDEND RIGHTS |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.1 Restricted Shares |
|
|
12 |
|
9.2 Stock Units |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 10. PROTECTION AGAINST DILUTION |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 Adjustments |
|
|
12 |
|
10.2 Reorganizations |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 11. LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE AWARDS |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 12. LIMITATION ON RIGHTS |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.1 Retention Rights |
|
|
13 |
|
12.2 Stockholders Rights |
|
|
13 |
|
12.3 Regulatory Requirements |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 13. LIMITATION ON PAYMENTS |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.1 Basic Rule |
|
|
13 |
|
13.2 Reduction of Payments |
|
|
14 |
|
13.3 Overpayments and Underpayments |
|
|
14 |
|
13.4 Related Corporations |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-3-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
ARTICLE 14. WITHHOLDING TAXES |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.1 General |
|
|
14 |
|
14.2 Share Withholding |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 15. ASSIGNMENT OR TRANSFER OF AWARDS |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 16. FUTURE OF PLAN |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.1 Term of the Plan |
|
|
15 |
|
16.2 Amendment or Termination |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 17. DEFINITIONS |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 18. EXECUTION |
|
|
19 |
|
-4-
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION 1992 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
As amended Effective May 4, 2010
ARTICLE 1. INTRODUCTION.
The Plan was adopted by the Board on November 23, 1992, subject to approval by the
Companys stockholders. The Board approved amendments to the Plan on November 21, 1995 and
on November 16, 2001, subject to approval by the Companys stockholders. The Plan was also
amended by either the Board or the Committee on December 23, 1996, on November 25, 1997, on
November 19, 1999, on November 21, 2000, on April 1, 2003, on August 26, 2003, on May 15,
2005, on December 8, 2006, on August 26, 2008, on December 22, 2008 and on May 4, 2010.
All share amounts in this restatement have been adjusted to reflect stock splits on June
26, 1995, on June 4, 2001, on June 5, 2002, and on March 10, 2004. The purpose of the Plan
is to promote the long-term success of the Company and the creation of stockholder value by
(a) encouraging Key Employees to focus on critical long-range objectives, (b) encouraging
the attraction and retention of Key Employees with exceptional qualifications and (c)
linking Key Employees directly to stockholder interests through increased stock ownership.
The Plan seeks to achieve this purpose by providing for Awards in the form of Restricted
Shares, Stock Units, Options (which may constitute incentive stock options or nonstatutory
stock options) or stock appreciation rights.
The Plan shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of
California.
ARTICLE 2. ADMINISTRATION.
2.1 Committee Composition. The Plan shall be administered by the Committee.
The Committee shall consist of two or more Outside Directors who shall be appointed by the
Board (although Committee functions may be delegated by the Committee to an officer or
officers to the extent that the Awards relate to persons who are not subject to the
reporting requirements of Section 16 of the Exchange Act).
2.2 Committee Responsibilities. The Committee shall (a) unless delegated to an
officer or officers in accordance with Section 2.1, select the Key Employees who are to
receive Awards under the Plan and determine the type, number, vesting requirements and
other conditions of such Awards, (b) interpret the Plan and (c) make all other decisions
relating to the operation of the Plan. The Committee may adopt such rules or guidelines as
it deems appropriate to implement the Plan. The Committees determinations under the Plan
shall be final and binding on all persons.
-5-
ARTICLE 3. SHARES AVAILABLE FOR GRANTS.
3.1 Basic Limitation. Any Common Shares issued pursuant to the Plan may be
authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares. The aggregate number of Restricted Shares,
Stock Units and Options awarded under the Plan shall not exceed 4,725,000 plus the number of
Common Shares remaining available for awards under the Companys 1987 Stock Option Plan and
Stock Option Plan for Non-employee Directors (the Prior Plans) at the time this Plan is first
approved by the stockholders. (No additional grants shall be made under the Prior Plans after
this Plan has been approved by the stockholders.) Effective October 1, 1997, and on each
October 1 thereafter until and including October 1, 2007, the aggregate number of Shares which
may be issued under the Plan to individuals shall be increased by a number of Common Shares
equal to 4 percent of the total number of Common Shares outstanding at the end of the most
recently concluded fiscal year. Any Common Shares that have been reserved but not issued as
Restricted Shares, Stock Units or Options during any fiscal year shall remain available for
grant during any subsequent fiscal year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no more than 5,062,500
Common Shares shall be available for the grant of ISOs for the remaining term of the Plan. The
aggregate number of Common Shares which may be issued under the Plan shall at all times be
subject to adjustment pursuant to Article 10.
3.2 Additional Shares. If any Stock Units or Options are forfeited or if any
Options terminate for any other reason before being exercised, then such Stock Units or Options
shall again become available for Awards under the Plan. If any options under the Prior Plans
are forfeited or terminate for any other reason before being exercised, then such options shall
become available for additional Awards under this Plan. However, if Options are surrendered
upon the exercise of related SARs, then such Options shall not be restored to the pool
available for Awards.
3.3 Dividend Equivalents. Any dividend equivalents distributed under the Plan
shall not be applied against the number of Restricted Shares, Stock Units or Options available
for Awards, whether or not such dividend equivalents are converted into Stock Units.
3.4 Outside Director Option Limitations. Notwithstanding the limitations set
forth in Section 3.1 above, effective February 1, 2000, there shall be an additional 506,250
aggregate number of Options available for awards under the Plan to Outside Directors as further
described in Section 4.2 below.
ARTICLE 4. ELIGIBILITY.
4.1 General Rules. Only Key Employees shall be eligible for designation as
Participants by the Committee. Key Employees who are Outside Directors shall only be
eligible for the grant of the NSOs described in Section 4.2.
4.2 Outside Directors. Any other provision of the Plan notwithstanding, the
participation of Outside Directors in the Plan shall be subject to the following restrictions:
(a) Outside Directors shall receive no Awards other than the NSOs described in this
Section 4.2.
-6-
(b)(i) Each person who first becomes an Outside Director on or after the date of the
Companys 2000 annual meeting of stockholders shall, upon becoming an Outside Director,
receive an NSO covering 30,000 Common Shares (subject to adjustment under Article 10),
hereinafter referred to as an Initial Grant. Such Initial Grant shall become exercisable
in increments of 6,000 shares (subject to adjustment under Article 10) on each of the first
through fifth anniversaries of the date of grant.
(ii) Each Outside Director who was acting as an Outside Director prior to the
Companys 2000 annual meeting of stockholders shall be entitled to receive an NSO grant of
Common Shares in an amount sufficient to increase his or her Initial Grant to 30,000 Common
Shares effective as of the date of such annual meeting.
(iii) On the date of each annual meeting of stockholders of the Company held on or
after January 1, 2000, each Outside Director who has been an Outside Director at least
since the prior annual meeting shall receive an NSO covering 11,250 Common Shares (subject
to adjustment under Article 10), hereinafter referred to as an Annual Grant. Such Annual
Grants shall be exercisable in full on the date of grant.
(iv) On the date of each annual meeting of stockholders of the Company held on or
after January 1, 2000, and prior to January 1, 2010, each Outside Director who chairs a
standing committee at the direction of the Chairman of the Board shall receive an NSO
covering an additional 1,500 Common Shares (subject to Adjustment under Article 10)
hereinafter referred to as a Committee Grant. Such Committee Grant shall be exercisable
in full on the date of grant.
(v) On the date of each annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company held on or
after January 1, 2002, each Outsider Director who has, prior to the date of such annual
meeting, elected to receive an NSO in lieu of any cash paid to such Outside Director by
virtue of such Outside Director serving as a member of the Companys Board of Directors
(the Annual Cash Retainer), shall receive an NSO covering the number of Common Shares
equal to the Annual Cash Retainer paid to Outside Directors, divided by the Black-Scholes
value of an NSO to purchase a single Common Share on the date of grant. Such grant shall
be hereinafter referred to as a Retainer Grant. If the Annual Cash Retainer payable to
an Outside Director is increased during the term for which such Outside Director has made
an election to receive the Retainer Grant and such Outside Director continues to serve as a
director of the Company on the date such Annual Cash Retainer is increased, an additional
NSO shall be granted, calculated using the same formula as the Retainer Grant based on the
increase in the Annual Cash Retainer with the date of grant being the date of the increase
in the Annual Cash Retainer. Retainer Grants shall be exercisable in full on the date of
grant. Black-Scholes value for purposes of this Section 4.2(b)(v) shall be determined by
the Company in a manner consistent with Black-Scholes valuations conducted for financial
reporting purposes and may involve the use of external consultants, advisors or auditors.
(c) All NSOs granted to an Outside Director under this Section 4.2 prior to December
18, 2008 shall also become exercisable in full in the event of the termination of such
Outside Directors service for any reason. For NSOs granted to an Outside Director under
this Section 4.2 from and following December 18, 2008, in the event of the termination of
such Outside Directors service for any reason, such NSOs shall become exercisable to the
extent provided pursuant to the terms of the applicable Stock Option Agreement or as
otherwise provided by
-7-
the Committee. NSOs that are not exercisable, or do not either become exercisable or
continue to vest, as of the termination of an Outside Directors service, shall terminate
as of such date.
(d) The Exercise Price under all NSOs granted to an Outside Director under this
Section 4.2 shall be equal to 100% of the Fair Market Value of a Common Share on the date
of grant, payable in one of the forms described in Sections 6.1, 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4.
(e) All NSOs granted to an Outside Director under this Section 4.2 shall terminate on
the earlier of (i) the 10th anniversary of the date of grant or (ii) the date 12 months
after the termination of such Outside Directors service for any reason, except as otherwise
determined by the Committee, but in no event will any such NSO terminate later than the 10th
anniversary of the date of grant.
4.3 Ten-Percent Stockholders. A Key Employee who owns more than 10% of the
total combined voting power of all classes of outstanding stock of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries shall not be eligible for the grant of an ISO unless the requirements set
forth in section 422(c)(6) of the Code are satisfied.
4.4 Limitation on Option Grants. No person shall receive Options for more
than 562,500 Common Shares (subject to adjustment under Article 10) in any single fiscal
year of the Company.
ARTICLE 5. OPTIONS.
5.1 Stock Option Agreement. Each grant of an Option under the Plan shall be
evidenced by a Stock Option Agreement between the Optionee and the Company. Such Option
shall be subject to all applicable terms of the Plan and may be subject to any other terms
that are not inconsistent with the Plan. The Stock Option Agreement shall specify whether
the Option is an ISO or an NSO. The provisions of the various Stock Option Agreements
entered into under the Plan need not be identical.
5.2 Awards Nontransferable. Except as provided in Article 15(ii), no Option
granted under the Plan shall be transferable by the Optionee other than by will, by a
beneficiary designation executed by the Optionee and delivered to the Company or by the
laws of descent and distribution. An Option may be exercised during the lifetime of the
Optionee only by him or her or by his or her guardian or legal representative. No Option or
interest therein may be transferred, assigned, pledged or hypothecated by the Optionee
during his or her lifetime, whether by operation of law or otherwise, or be made subject to
execution, attachment or similar process.
5.3 Number of Shares. Each Stock Option Agreement shall specify the number
of Shares subject to the Option and shall provide for the adjustment of such number in
accordance with Article 10.
5.4 Exercise Price. Each Stock Option Agreement shall specify the Exercise
Price. The Exercise Price shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a Common
Share on the date of grant.
-8-
5.5 Exercisability and Term. Each Stock Option Agreement shall specify the
date when all or any installment of the Option is to become exercisable. The Stock Option
Agreement shall also specify the term of the Option; provided that the term of an ISO shall
in no event exceed 10 years from the date of grant. A Stock Option Agreement may provide
for accelerated exercisability in the event of the Optionees death, disability or
retirement or other events and may provide for expiration prior to the end of its term in
the event of the termination of the Optionees service. NSOs may also be awarded in
combination with Restricted Shares or Stock Units, and such an Award may provide that the
NSOs will not be exercisable unless the related Restricted Shares or Stock Units are
forfeited.
5.6 Effect of Change in Control. The Committee may determine, at the time of
granting an Option or thereafter, that such Option (and any SARs included therein) shall
become fully exercisable as to all Common Shares subject to such Option in the event that a
Change in Control occurs with respect to the Company. If the Committee finds that there is
a reasonable possibility that, within the succeeding six months, a Change in Control will
occur with respect to the Company, then the Committee may determine that any or all
outstanding Options (and any SARs included therein) shall become fully exercisable as to
all Common Shares subject to such Options.
5.7 Modification or Assumption of Options. Within the limitations of the
Plan, the Committee may modify, extend or assume outstanding options or may accept the
cancellation of outstanding options (whether granted by the Company or by another issuer)
in return for the grant of new options for the same or a different number of shares and at
the same or a different exercise price. The foregoing notwithstanding, no modification of
an Option shall, without the consent of the Optionee, alter or impair his or her rights or
obligations under such Option.
ARTICLE 6. PAYMENT FOR OPTION SHARES.
6.1 General Rule. The entire Exercise Price of Common Shares issued upon
exercise of Options shall be payable in cash at the time when such Common Shares are
purchased, except as follows:
(a) In the case of an ISO granted under the Plan, payment shall be made
only pursuant to the express provisions of the applicable Stock Option
Agreement. The Stock Option Agreement may specify that payment may be made in
any form(s) described in this Article 6.
(b) In the case of an NSO, the Committee may at any time accept payment in
any form(s) described in this Article 6.
Notwithstanding any provision in this Article 6 or in an Optionees Stock Option Agreement,
an Optionee, shall not be permitted to exercise an Option in any manner which would violate
applicable state and federal laws, including, without limitation, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
6.2 Surrender of Stock. To the extent that this Section 6.2 is applicable,
payment for all or any part of the Exercise Price may be made with Common Shares which have
already been owned by the Optionee for more than twelve months. Such Common
-9-
Shares shall be valued at their Fair Market Value on the date when the new Common Shares
are purchased under the Plan.
6.3 Exercise/Sale. To the extent that this Section 6.3 is applicable,
payment may be made by the delivery (on a form prescribed by the Company) of an irrevocable
direction to a securities broker or other party approved by the Company to sell Common
Shares and to deliver all or part of the sales proceeds to the Company in payment of all or
part of the Exercise Price and any withholding taxes.
6.4 Exercise/Pledge. To the extent that this Section 6.4 is applicable,
payment may be made by the delivery (on a form prescribed by the Company) of an irrevocable
direction to pledge Common Shares to a securities broker or lender approved by the Company,
as security for a loan, and to deliver all or part of the loan proceeds to the Company in
payment of all or part of the Exercise Price and any withholding taxes.
6.5 Other Forms of Payment. To the extent that this Section 6.5 is
applicable, payment may be made in any other form that is consistent with applicable laws,
regulations and rules.
ARTICLE 7. STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS.
7.1 Grant of SARs. At the discretion of the Committee, an SAR may be
included in each Option granted under the Plan, other than the NSOs granted to Outside
Directors under Section 4.2. Such SAR shall entitle the Optionee (or any person having the
right to exercise the Option after his or her death) to surrender to the Company,
unexercised, all or any part of that portion of the Option which then is exercisable and to
receive from the Company Common Shares or cash, or a combination of Common Shares and cash,
as the Committee shall determine. If an SAR is exercised, the number of Common Shares
remaining subject to the related Option shall be reduced accordingly, and vice versa. The
amount of cash and/or the Fair Market Value of Common Shares received upon exercise of an
SAR shall, in the aggregate, be equal to the amount by which the Fair Market value (on the
date of surrender) of the Common Shares subject to the surrendered portion of the Option
exceeds the Exercise Price. In no event shall any SAR be exercised if such Fair Market
Value does not exceed the Exercise Price. An SAR may be included in an ISO only at the
time of grant but may be included in an NSO at the time of grant or at any subsequent time,
but not later than six months before the expiration of such NSO.
7.2 Exercise of SARs. An SAR may be exercised to the extent that the Option
in which it is included is exercisable, subject to the restrictions imposed by Rule 16b-3
(or its successor) under the Exchange Act, if applicable. If, on the date when an Option
expires, the Exercise Price under such Option is less than the Fair Market Value on such
date but any portion of such Option has not been exercised or surrendered, then any SAR
included in such Option shall automatically be deemed to be exercised as of such date with
respect to such portion. An Option granted under the Plan may provide that it will be
exercisable as an SAR only in the event of a Change in Control.
ARTICLE 8. RESTRICTED SHARES AND STOCK UNITS.
-10-
8.1 Time, Amount and Form of Awards. Restricted Shares or Stock Units with
respect to an Award Year may be granted during such Award Year or at any time thereafter.
Awards under the Plan may be granted in the form of Restricted Shares, in the form of Stock
Units, or in any combination of both. Restricted Shares or Stock Units may also be awarded
in combination with NSOs, and such an Award may provide that the Restricted Shares or Stock
Units will be forfeited in the event that the related NSOs are exercised.
8.2 Payment for Awards. To the extent that an Award is granted in the form
of newly issued Restricted Shares, the Award recipient shall be required to pay the Company
in lawful money of the U.S. an amount equal to the par value of such Restricted Shares. To
the extent that an Award is granted in the form of Stock Units or treasury shares, no cash
consideration shall be required of Award recipients.
8.3 Vesting Conditions. Each Award of Restricted Shares or Stock Units shall
become vested, in full or in installments, upon satisfaction of the conditions specified in
the Stock Award Agreement. A Stock Award Agreement may provide for accelerated vesting in
the event of the Participants death, disability or retirement or other events. The
Committee may determine, at the time of making an Award or thereafter, that such Award
shall become fully vested in the event that a Change in Control occurs with respect to the
Company.
8.4 Form and Time of Settlement of Stock Units. Settlement of vested Stock
Units may be made in the form of cash, in the form of Common Shares, or in any combination
of both. Methods of converting Stock Units into cash may include (without limitation) a
method based on the average Fair Market Value of Common Shares over a series of trading
days. Vested Stock Units may be settled in a lump sum or in installments. The distribution
may occur or commence when all vesting conditions applicable to the Stock Units have been
satisfied or have lapsed, or it may be deferred to any later date. The amount of a deferred
distribution may be increased by an interest factor or by dividend equivalents. Until an
Award of Stock Units is settled, the number of such Stock Units shall be subject to
adjustment pursuant to Article 10.
8.5 Death of Recipient. Any Stock Units Award that becomes payable after the
recipients death shall be distributed to the recipients beneficiary or beneficiaries.
Each recipient of a Stock Units Award under the Plan shall designate one or more
beneficiaries for this purpose by filing the prescribed form with the Company. A
beneficiary designation may be changed by filing the prescribed form with the Company at
any time before the Award recipients death. If no beneficiary was designated or if no
designated beneficiary survives the Award recipient, then any Stock Units Award that
becomes payable after the recipients death shall be distributed to the recipients estate.
8.6 Creditors Rights. A holder of Stock Units shall have no rights other
than those of a general creditor of the Company. Stock Units represent an unfunded and
unsecured obligation of the Company, subject to the terms and conditions of the applicable
Stock Award Agreement.
-11-
ARTICLE 9. VOTING AND DIVIDEND RIGHTS.
9.1 Restricted Shares. The holders of Restricted Shares awarded under the
Plan shall have the same voting, dividend and other rights as the Companys other
stockholders. A Stock Award Agreement, however, may require that the holders of Restricted
Shares invest any cash dividends received in additional Restricted Shares. Such additional
Restricted Shares shall be subject to the same conditions and restrictions as the Award
with respect to which the dividends were paid. Such additional Restricted Shares shall not
reduce the number of Common Shares available under Article 3.
9.2 Stock Units. The holders of Stock Units shall have no voting rights.
Prior to settlement or forfeiture, any Stock Unit awarded under the Plan may, to the extent
determined by the Committee, carry with it a right to dividend equivalents. Any such right
would entitle the holder to be credited with an amount equal to all cash dividends paid on
one Common Share while the Stock Unit is outstanding. Dividend equivalents may be converted
into additional Stock Units. Settlement of dividend equivalents may be made in the form of
cash, in the form of Common Shares, or in a combination of both. Prior to distribution, any
dividend equivalents which are not paid shall be subject to the same conditions and
restrictions as the Stock Units to which they attach.
ARTICLE 10. PROTECTION AGAINST DILUTION.
10.1 Adjustments. In the event of a subdivision of the outstanding Common
Shares, a declaration of a dividend payable in Common Shares, a declaration of a dividend
payable in a form other than Common Shares in an amount that has a material effect on the
price of Common Shares, a combination or consolidation of the outstanding Common Shares (by
reclassification or otherwise) into a lesser number of Common Shares, a recapitalization, a
spinoff or a similar occurrence, the Committee shall make appropriate adjustments in one or
more of (a) the number of Options, Restricted Shares and Stock Units available for future
Awards under Article 3, (b) the number of NSOs to be granted to Outside Directors under
Section 4.2, (c) the number of Stock Units included in any prior Award which has not yet
been settled, (d) the number of Common Shares covered by each outstanding Option or (e) the
Exercise Price under each outstanding Option. Except as provided in this Article 10, a
Participant shall have no rights by reason of any issue by the Company of stock of any
class or securities convertible into stock of any class, any subdivision or consolidation
of shares of stock of any class, the payment of any stock dividend or any other increase or
decrease in the number of shares of stock of any class.
10.2 Reorganizations. In the event that the Company is a party to a merger
or other reorganization, outstanding Options, Restricted Shares and Stock Units shall be
subject to the agreement of merger or reorganization. Such agreement may provide, without
limitation, for the assumption of outstanding Awards by the surviving corporation or its
parent, for their continuation by the Company (if the Company is a surviving corporation),
for accelerated vesting or for settlement in cash.
-12-
ARTICLE 11. LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE AWARDS.
The Company may grant long-term performance awards under other plans or programs. Such
awards may be settled in the form of Common Shares issued under this Plan. Such Common
Shares shall be treated for all purposes under the Plan like Common Shares issued in
settlement of Stock Units and shall reduce the number of Common Shares available under
Article 3.
ARTICLE 12. LIMITATION ON RIGHTS.
12.1 Retention Rights. Neither the Plan nor any award granted under the Plan
shall be deemed to give any individual a right to remain an employee or director of the
Company or a Subsidiary. The Company and its Subsidiaries reserve the right to terminate
the service of any employee or director at any time, with or without cause, subject to
applicable laws, the Companys certificate of incorporation and by-laws and a written
employment agreement (if any).
12.2 Stockholders Rights. A Participant shall have no dividend rights,
voting rights or other rights as a stockholder with respect to any Common Shares covered by
his or her Award prior to the issuance of a stock certificate for such Common Shares. No
adjustment shall be made for cash dividends or other rights for which the record date is
prior to the date when such certificate is issued, except as expressly provided in Articles
8, 9 and 10.
12.3 Regulatory Requirements. Any other provision of the Plan
notwithstanding, the obligation of the Company to issue Common Shares under the Plan shall
be subject to all applicable laws, rules and regulations and such approval by any
regulatory body as may be required. The Company reserves the right to restrict, in whole or
in part, the delivery of Common Shares pursuant to any Award prior to the satisfaction of
all legal requirements relating to the issuance of such Common Shares, to their
registration, qualification or listing or to an exemption from registration, qualification
or listing.
ARTICLE 13. LIMITATION ON PAYMENTS.
13.1 Basic Rule. Any provision of the Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, in
the event that the independent auditors most recently selected by the Board (the Auditors)
determine that any payment or transfer by the Company to or for the benefit of a Key
Employee, whether paid or payable (or transferred or transferable) pursuant to the terms of
this Plan or otherwise (a Payment), would be non-deductible by the Company for federal
income tax purposes because of the provisions concerning excess parachute payments in
section 280G of the Code, then the aggregate present value of all Payments shall be reduced
(but not below zero) to the Reduced Amount; provided that the Committee, at the time of
making an Award under this Plan or at any time thereafter, may specify in writing that such
Award shall not be so reduced and shall not be subject to this Article 13. For purposes of
this Article 13, the Reduced Amount shall be the amount, expressed as a present value,
which maximizes the aggregate present value of the Payments without causing any Payment to be
nondeductible by the Company because of section 280G of the Code.
-13-
13.2 Reduction of Payments. If the Auditors determine that any Payment would
be nondeductible by the Company because of section 280G of the Code, then the Company shall
promptly give the Key Employee notice to that effect and a copy of the detailed calculation
thereof and of the Reduced Amount, and the Key Employee may then elect, in his or her sole
discretion, which and how much of the Payments shall be eliminated or reduced (as long as
after such election the aggregate present value of the Payments equals the Reduced Amount)
and shall advise the Company in writing of his or her election within 10 days of receipt of
notice. If no such election is made by the Key Employee within such 10-day period, then
the Company may elect which and how much of the Payments shall be eliminated or reduced (as
long as after such election the aggregate present value of the Payments equals the Reduced
Amount) and shall notify the Key Employee promptly of such election. For purposes of this
Article 13, present value shall be determined in accordance with section 280G(d)(4) of the
Code. All determinations made by the Auditors under this Article 13 shall be binding upon
the Company and the Key Employee and shall be made within 60 days of the date when a
payment becomes payable or transferable. As promptly as practicable following such
determination and the elections hereunder, the Company shall pay or transfer to or for the
benefit of the Key Employee such amounts as are then due to him or her under the Plan and
shall promptly pay or transfer to or for the benefit of the Key Employee in the future such
amounts as become due to him or her under the Plan.
13.3 Overpayments and Underpayments. As a result of uncertainty in the
application of section 280G of the Code at the time of an initial determination by the
Auditors hereunder, it is possible that Payments will have been made by the Company which
should not have been made (an Overpayment) or that additional Payments which will not
have been made by the Company could have been made (an Underpayment), consistent in each
case with the calculation of the Reduced Amount hereunder. In the event that the Auditors,
based upon the assertion of a deficiency by the Internal Revenue Service against the
Company or the Key Employee which the Auditors believe has a high probability of success,
determine that an Overpayment has been made, such Overpayment shall be treated for all
purposes as a loan to the Key Employee which he or she shall repay to the Company, together
with interest at the applicable federal rate provided in section 7872(f)(2) of the Code;
provided, however, that no amount shall be payable by the Key Employee to the Company if
and to the extent that such payment would not reduce the amount which is subject to
taxation under section 4999 of the Code. In the event that the Auditors determine that an
Underpayment has occurred, such Underpayment shall promptly be paid or transferred by the
Company to or for the benefit of the Key Employee, together with interest at the applicable
federal rate provided in section 7872(f)(2) of the Code.
13.4 Related Corporations. For purposes of this Article 13, the term
Company shall include affiliated corporations to the extent determined by the Auditors in
accordance with section 280G(d)(5) of the Code.
ARTICLE 14. WITHHOLDING TAXES.
14.1 General. To the extent required by applicable federal, state, local or
foreign law, the recipient of any payment or distribution under the Plan shall make
arrangements satisfactory to the Company for the satisfaction of any withholding tax
obligations that arise by reason of the receipt or vesting of such payment or distribution.
The
-14-
Company shall not be required to issue any Common Shares or make any cash payment under the
Plan until such obligations are satisfied.
14.2 Share Withholding. The Committee may permit a Participant to satisfy
all or part of his or her withholding or income tax obligations by having the Company
withhold a portion of any Common Shares that otherwise would be issued to him or her or by
surrendering a portion of any Common Shares that previously were issued to him or her. Such
Common Shares shall be valued at their Fair Market Value on the date when taxes otherwise
would be withheld in cash. Any payment of taxes by assigning Common Shares to the Company
may be subject to restrictions, including any restrictions required by rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
ARTICLE 15. ASSIGNMENT OR TRANSFER OF AWARDS.
(i) Except as provided in Article 14, any Award granted under the Plan shall not be
anticipated, assigned, attached, garnished, optioned, transferred or made subject to any
creditors process, whether voluntarily, involuntarily or by operation of law. Any act in
violation of this Article 15 shall be void. However, this Article 15 shall not preclude a
Participant from designating a beneficiary who will receive any undistributed Awards in the
event of the Participants death, nor shall it preclude a transfer by will or by the laws
of descent and distribution. In addition, neither this Article 15 nor any other provision
of the Plan shall preclude a Participant from transferring or assigning Restricted Shares
or Stock Units to (a) the trustee of a trust that is revocable by such Participant alone,
both at the time of the transfer or assignment and at all times thereafter prior to such
Participants death, or (b) the trustee of any other trust to the extent approved in
advance by the Committee in writing. A transfer or assignment of Restricted Shares or Stock
Units from such trustee to any person other than such Participant shall be permitted only
to the extent approved in advance by the Committee in writing, and Restricted Shares or
Stock Units held by such trustee shall be subject to all of the conditions and restrictions
set forth in the Plan and in the applicable Stock Award Agreement, as if such trustee were
a party to such Agreement.
(ii) Notwithstanding paragraph (i) above, an NSO or portion thereof may be transferred
by the Optionee by gift to (a) the Optionees immediate family, (b) a partnership or
limited liability company consisting solely of the Optionee and/or immediate family, or (c)
to a trust established for the benefit of the Optionee and/or one or more members of the
immediate family of the Optionee (including a charitable remainder trust whose income
beneficiaries consist solely of such persons), or (d) as provided in the Optionees Stock
Option Agreement or with consent of the Board or Committee to any other person or entity to
which a transfer of compensatory securities is permitted under the applicable rules for a
Form S-8 registration statement, provided that such transfer will not be effective until
notice of such transfer is delivered to the Corporation. For purposes of this paragraph
(ii) immediate family means spouse, children and grandchildren. An Option or portion
thereof may also be transferred pursuant to a domestic relations order of a court of
competent jurisdiction.
ARTICLE 16. FUTURE OF THE PLAN.
16.1 Term of the Plan. The Plan, as set forth herein, shall become effective
upon approval by the Stockholders of the Company. The Plan shall remain in effect until
-15-
February 4, 2012, unless terminated earlier pursuant to Section 16.2, except that no ISOs
shall be granted after November 15, 2011.
16.2 Amendment or Termination. The Board or the Committee may, at any time
and for any reason, amend or terminate the Plan. An amendment of the Plan shall be subject
to the approval of the Companys stockholders only to the extent required by applicable
laws, regulations or rules. No Awards shall be granted under the Plan after the termination
thereof. The termination of the Plan, or any amendment thereof, shall not affect any Option
previously granted under the Plan.
ARTICLE 17. DEFINITIONS.
17.1 Award means any award of an Option (with or without a related SAR), a
Restricted Share or a Stock Unit under the Plan.
17.2 Award Year means a fiscal year with respect to which an Award may be
granted.
17.3 Board means the Companys Board of Directors, as constituted from time
to time.
17.4 Change in Control means the occurrence of either of the following
events:
(a) A change in the composition of the Board, as a result of which fewer
than one-half of the incumbent directors are directors who either:
(i) Had been directors of the Company 24 months prior to such
change; or
(ii) Were elected, or nominated for election, to the Board with the
affirmative votes of at least a majority of the directors who had been
directors of the Company 24 months prior to such change and who were
still in office at the time of the election or nomination; or
(b) Any person (as such term is used in sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the
Exchange Act) by the acquisition or aggregation of securities is or becomes the
beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company
representing 50% or more of the combined voting power of the Companys then
outstanding securities ordinarily (and apart from rights accruing under special
circumstances) having the right to vote at elections of directors (the Base
Capital Stock); except that any change in the relative beneficial ownership of
the Companys securities by any person resulting solely from a reduction in the
aggregate number of outstanding shares of Base Capital Stock, and any decrease
thereafter in such persons ownership of securities, shall be disregarded until
such person increases in any manner, directly or indirectly, such persons
beneficial ownership of any securities of the Company.
17.5 Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
-16-
17.6 Committee means a committee of the Board, as described in Article 2.
17.7 Common Share means one share of the Common Stock of the Company.
17.8 Company means Fair Isaac Corporation, a Delaware corporation.
17.9 Exchange Act means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
17.10 Exercise Price means the amount for which one Common Share may be
purchased upon exercise of an Option, as specified in the applicable Stock Option
Agreement.
17.11 Fair Market Value means the market price of Common Shares, determined
by the Committee as follows:
(a) If the Common Shares were traded over-the-counter on the date in
question, whether or not classified as a national market issue, then the Fair
Market Value shall be equal to the mean between the last reported bid and asked
prices quoted by the NASDAQ system for such date;
(b) If the Common Shares were traded on a stock exchange on the date in
question, then the Fair Market Value shall be equal to the closing price
reported by the applicable composite transactions report for such date; and
(c) If none of the foregoing provisions is applicable, then the Fair Market
Value shall be determined by the Committee in good faith on such basis as it
deems appropriate.
Whenever possible, the determination of Fair Market Value by the Committee shall be based
on the prices reported by the Research Section of the National Association of Securities
Dealers or in the Western Edition of The Wall Street Journal. Such determination shall be
conclusive and binding on all persons.
17.12 ISO means an incentive stock option described in section 422(b) of
the Code.
17.13 Key Employee means (a) a key common-law employee of the Company or of
a Subsidiary, as determined by the Committee, or (b) an Outside Director. Service as an
Outside Director shall be considered employment for all purposes of the Plan, except as
provided in Sections 4.1 and 4.2.
17.14 NSO means an employee stock option not described in sections 422 or
423 of the Code.
17.15 Option means an ISO or NSO granted under the Plan and entitling the
holder to purchase one Common Share.
17.16 Optionee means an individual or estate who holds an Option.
-17-
17.17 Outside Director shall mean a member of the Board who is not a
common-law employee of the Company or of a Subsidiary.
17.18 Participant means an individual or estate who holds an Award.
17.19 Plan means this Fair Isaac Corporation 1992 Long-Term Incentive Plan,
as it may be amended from time to time.
17.20 Restricted Share means a Common Share awarded under the Plan.
17.21 SAR means a stock appreciation right granted under the Plan.
17.22 Stock Award Agreement means the agreement between the Company and the
recipient of a Restricted Share or Stock Unit which contains the terms, conditions and
restrictions pertaining to such Restricted Share or Stock Unit.
17.23 Stock Option Agreement means the agreement between the Company and an
Optionee which contains the terms, conditions and restrictions pertaining to his or her
Option.
17.24 Stock Unit means a bookkeeping entry representing the equivalent of
one Common Share and awarded under the Plan.
17.25 Subsidiary means any corporation, if the Company and/or one or more
other Subsidiaries own not less than 50% of the total combined voting power of all classes
of outstanding stock of such corporation. A corporation that attains the status of a
Subsidiary on a date after the adoption of the Plan shall be considered a Subsidiary
commencing as of such date.
-18-
ARTICLE 18. EXECUTION.
To verify that this is the amended and restated Plan, the Company has caused its duly
authorized officer to affix the corporate name and seal hereto.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Mark R. Scadina
|
|
|
|
Mark R. Scadina |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel
and Corporate Secretary |
|
|
-19-
exv31w1
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Mark N. Greene, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fair Isaac Corporation; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. |
Date: August 6, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MARK N. GREENE
|
|
Mark N. Greene |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
exv31w2
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Thomas A. Bradley, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fair Isaac Corporation; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. |
Date: August 6, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ THOMAS A. BRADLEY
|
|
Thomas A. Bradley |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
exv32w1
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this
periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Fair Isaac Corporation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 6, 2010 |
/s/ MARK N. GREENE
|
|
|
Mark N. Greene |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
exv32w2
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this
periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Fair Isaac Corporation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 6, 2010 |
/s/ THOMAS A. BRADLEY
|
|
|
Thomas A. Bradley |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|