e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
[NO FEE REQUIRED] |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-11689
Fair Isaac Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
94-1499887
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
901 Marquette Avenue, Suite 3200
Minneapolis, Minnesota
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
55402-3232
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
612-758-5200
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer þ
|
|
Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Non-Accelerated Filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
The
number of shares of common stock outstanding on April 30, 2011
was 39,832,994 (excluding
49,023,789 shares held by the Company as treasury stock).
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except par value data) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
258,294 |
|
|
$ |
146,199 |
|
Marketable securities available for sale, current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,615 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
106,893 |
|
|
|
113,187 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
15,898 |
|
|
|
19,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
381,085 |
|
|
|
347,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities available for sale, less current portion |
|
|
5,123 |
|
|
|
4,367 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
10,999 |
|
|
|
11,074 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
29,038 |
|
|
|
30,975 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
667,431 |
|
|
|
665,953 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
23,423 |
|
|
|
27,244 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
27,530 |
|
|
|
27,774 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
7,797 |
|
|
|
9,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,152,426 |
|
|
$ |
1,123,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
16,424 |
|
|
$ |
8,765 |
|
Accrued compensation and employee benefits |
|
|
24,004 |
|
|
|
33,697 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
26,383 |
|
|
|
28,732 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
51,020 |
|
|
|
42,953 |
|
Current maturities on long-term debt |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
125,831 |
|
|
|
122,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes |
|
|
512,000 |
|
|
|
512,000 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
16,318 |
|
|
|
14,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
654,149 |
|
|
|
648,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock ($0.01 par value; 1,000 shares authorized; none issued
and outstanding) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock ($0.01 par value; 200,000 shares authorized, 88,857 shares
issued, 39,824 and 39,882 shares outstanding at March 31, 2011
and September 30, 2010, respectively) |
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
Paid-in-capital |
|
|
1,099,635 |
|
|
|
1,103,244 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost (49,033 and 48,975 shares at March 31, 2011
and September 30, 2010, respectively) |
|
|
(1,555,141 |
) |
|
|
(1,556,253 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
969,357 |
|
|
|
947,202 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(15,972 |
) |
|
|
(19,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
498,277 |
|
|
|
474,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,152,426 |
|
|
$ |
1,123,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, |
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactional and maintenance |
|
$ |
111,431 |
|
|
$ |
113,701 |
|
|
$ |
226,193 |
|
|
$ |
228,807 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
27,041 |
|
|
|
23,926 |
|
|
|
54,949 |
|
|
|
50,163 |
|
License |
|
|
14,352 |
|
|
|
6,093 |
|
|
|
27,613 |
|
|
|
16,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
152,824 |
|
|
|
143,720 |
|
|
|
308,755 |
|
|
|
295,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues (1) |
|
|
48,506 |
|
|
|
44,641 |
|
|
|
94,309 |
|
|
|
87,160 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
16,222 |
|
|
|
19,251 |
|
|
|
34,283 |
|
|
|
38,227 |
|
Selling, general and administrative (1) |
|
|
55,449 |
|
|
|
53,697 |
|
|
|
115,082 |
|
|
|
108,900 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets (1) |
|
|
1,933 |
|
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
|
3,862 |
|
|
|
6,235 |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
11,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
133,632 |
|
|
|
120,659 |
|
|
|
259,927 |
|
|
|
240,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
19,192 |
|
|
|
23,061 |
|
|
|
48,828 |
|
|
|
54,694 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
1,046 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(8,137 |
) |
|
|
(5,423 |
) |
|
|
(16,378 |
) |
|
|
(10,831 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations before income taxes |
|
|
11,034 |
|
|
|
19,172 |
|
|
|
32,457 |
|
|
|
45,555 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
3,289 |
|
|
|
6,180 |
|
|
|
8,703 |
|
|
|
14,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
7,745 |
|
|
$ |
12,992 |
|
|
$ |
23,754 |
|
|
$ |
30,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
Dilluted |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
40,010 |
|
|
|
46,447 |
|
|
|
39,966 |
|
|
|
47,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
40,618 |
|
|
|
46,870 |
|
|
|
40,528 |
|
|
|
47,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cost of revenues and selling, general and administrative expenses exclude the
amortization of intangible assets. See Note 2 to the accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements. |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Accumulated
Other |
|
|
Total
Stockholders |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Par Value |
|
|
Paid-in-Capital |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Comprehensive Loss |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
39,882 |
|
|
$ |
399 |
|
|
$ |
1,103,244 |
|
|
$ |
(1,556,253 |
) |
|
$ |
947,202 |
|
|
$ |
(19,678 |
) |
|
$ |
474,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(5,489 |
) |
|
|
14,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect from share-based
payment arrangements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(642 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,442 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,448 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of ESPP shares from
treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock to
employees from treasury |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(6,177 |
) |
|
|
4,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,599 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,599 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,754 |
|
|
$ |
23,754 |
|
Unrealized loss on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
Cumulative translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,743 |
|
|
|
3,743 |
|
|
|
3,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
39,824 |
|
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
$ |
1,099,635 |
|
|
$ |
(1,555,141 |
) |
|
$ |
969,357 |
|
|
$ |
(15,972 |
) |
|
$ |
498,277 |
|
|
$ |
27,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
23,754 |
|
|
$ |
30,678 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12,770 |
|
|
|
16,128 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
8,205 |
|
|
|
9,382 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect from share-based payment arrangements |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
(3,419 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements |
|
|
(1,127 |
) |
|
|
(1,038 |
) |
Net amortization of premium on marketable securities |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
Benefit from provision for doubtful accounts, net |
|
|
(582 |
) |
|
|
(810 |
) |
Net loss on sales of property and equipment |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of disposition effects: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
7,275 |
|
|
|
12,324 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
3,911 |
|
|
|
(644 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
6,257 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Accrued compensation and employee benefits |
|
|
(9,788 |
) |
|
|
(3,138 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
9,304 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
6,169 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
59,618 |
|
|
|
69,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(5,106 |
) |
|
|
(8,010 |
) |
Cash proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
Cash proceeds from sale of product line assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
490 |
|
Purchases of marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,749 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities |
|
|
13,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities |
|
|
54,545 |
|
|
|
80,666 |
|
Distribution from cost method investees |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
63,158 |
|
|
|
1,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuances of common stock under employee stock
option and purchase plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,889 |
|
|
|
2,156 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(1,599 |
) |
|
|
(1,877 |
) |
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(19,311 |
) |
|
|
(57,530 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements |
|
|
1,127 |
|
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(12,894 |
) |
|
|
(56,213 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
2,213 |
|
|
|
(2,446 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
112,095 |
|
|
|
12,753 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
146,199 |
|
|
|
178,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
|
$ |
258,294 |
|
|
$ |
190,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds |
|
$ |
8,696 |
|
|
$ |
9,607 |
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
16,082 |
|
|
$ |
10,629 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
1. Nature of Business
Fair Isaac Corporation
Incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware, Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) is a
provider of analytic, software and data management products and services that enable businesses to
automate, improve and connect decisions. FICO provides a range of analytical solutions, credit
scoring and credit account management products and services to banks, credit reporting agencies,
credit card processing agencies, insurers, retailers and healthcare organizations.
In these condensed consolidated financial statements, FICO is referred to as we, us,
our, or FICO.
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
We have prepared the accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial
statements in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and the applicable accounting guidance.
Consequently, we have not necessarily included in this Form 10-Q all information and footnotes
required for audited financial statements. In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited interim
condensed consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q reflect all adjustments (consisting
only of normal recurring adjustments, except as otherwise indicated) necessary for a fair
presentation of our financial position and results of operations. These unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with our audited
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended September 30, 2010. The interim financial information contained in this report is
not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other interim period or for the
entire fiscal year.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of FICO and its
subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. These estimates and assumptions include,
but are not limited to, assessing the following: the recoverability of accounts receivable,
goodwill and other intangible assets, software development costs and deferred tax assets; the
benefits related to uncertain tax positions, the determination of the fair value of stock-based
compensation, the ability to estimate hours in connection with fixed-fee service contracts, the
ability to estimate transactional-based revenues for which actual transaction volumes have not yet
been received and the determination of whether fees are fixed or determinable and collection is
probable or reasonably assured.
2. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Amortization expense associated with our intangible assets, which has been reflected as a
separate operating expense caption within the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of
income, consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, |
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
$ |
568 |
|
|
$ |
1,711 |
|
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
|
$ |
3,450 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
1,365 |
|
|
|
1,359 |
|
|
|
2,725 |
|
|
|
2,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,933 |
|
|
$ |
3,070 |
|
|
$ |
3,862 |
|
|
$ |
6,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
Cost of revenues reflects our amortization of completed technology and selling, general and
administrative expenses reflects our amortization of other intangible assets. Intangible assets
(excluding goodwill) were $23.4 million and $27.2 million, net of accumulated amortization of
$111.1 million and $107.0 million, as of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010, respectively.
Estimated future intangible asset amortization expense associated with intangible assets
existing at March 31, 2011, was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year |
|
|
|
|
Remainder of fiscal 2011 |
|
$ |
3,869 |
|
2012 |
|
|
6,162 |
|
2013 |
|
|
4,148 |
|
2014 |
|
|
2,407 |
|
2015 |
|
|
2,407 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
4,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes changes to goodwill during fiscal 2011, both in total and
as allocated to our segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications |
|
|
Scores |
|
|
Tools |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
452,248 |
|
|
$ |
146,648 |
|
|
$ |
67,057 |
|
|
$ |
665,953 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
1,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
453,466 |
|
|
$ |
146,648 |
|
|
$ |
67,317 |
|
|
$ |
667,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Restructuring Expenses
The following table summarizes our restructuring accruals and certain FICO facility closures.
The current portion and non-current portion is recorded in other accrued current liabilities and
other long-term liabilities, respectively, within the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheets. These balances are expected to be paid by fiscal 2018.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual at |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Additions |
|
|
Payments |
|
|
Reversals |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Facilities charges |
|
$ |
2,836 |
|
|
$ |
4,226 |
|
|
$ |
(355 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,707 |
|
Employee separation |
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
8,165 |
|
|
|
(5,613 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,578 |
|
|
$ |
12,391 |
|
|
$ |
(5,968 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
10,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: current portion |
|
|
(1,474 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,496 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current |
|
$ |
2,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, we incurred net charges totaling $0.9 million
consisting mainly of costs for vacating excess leased space. During the quarter ended March 31,
2011, in connection with our reengineering initiative, we incurred net charges totaling $11.5
million. The charges included $8.2 million for severance costs associated with the reduction of
177 positions throughout the company. Cash payments for substantially all the severance costs will
be paid by the end of our third quarter of fiscal 2011. We also recognized charges of $3.3 million
associated with vacating excess leased space in Minnesota and Georgia. The charge represents
future cash lease payments, net of estimated sublease income, which will be paid out over the next
seven years.
6
4. Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions
The
following table summarizes property and equipment, and the related
accumulated depreciation and amortization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Property and equipment |
|
$ |
193,676 |
|
|
$ |
218,125 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(164,638 |
) |
|
|
(187,150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,038 |
|
|
$ |
30,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Earnings Per Share
The following reconciles the numerators and denominators of basic and diluted earnings per
share (EPS):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, |
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per |
|
|
(In thousands, except per |
|
|
|
share data) |
|
|
share data) |
|
Numerator for diluted and basic earnings per share
net income: |
|
$ |
7,745 |
|
|
$ |
12,992 |
|
|
$ |
23,754 |
|
|
$ |
30,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average shares |
|
|
40,010 |
|
|
|
46,447 |
|
|
|
39,966 |
|
|
|
47,033 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities |
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average shares |
|
|
40,618 |
|
|
|
46,870 |
|
|
|
40,528 |
|
|
|
47,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share from continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The computation of diluted EPS for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, excludes
options to purchase approximately 3,833,000 and 4,796,000 shares of common stock, respectively, and
for the six months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 excludes options to purchase approximately
4,204,000 and 5,136,000 shares of common stock, respectively, because the options exercise prices
exceeded the average market price of our common stock in these periods and their inclusion would be
antidilutive.
6. Segment Information
We are organized into the following three reportable segments to align with internal
management of our worldwide business operations based on product offerings.
|
|
|
Applications. Our Applications products are pre-configured Decision Management
applications and associated professional services, designed for a specific type of business
problem or process, such as marketing, account origination, customer management, fraud and
insurance claims management. |
|
|
|
|
Scores. This segment includes our business-to-business scoring solutions, our
myFICO® solutions for consumers and associated professional services. Our scoring
solutions give our clients access to analytics that can be easily integrated into their
transaction streams and decision-making processes. Our scoring solutions are distributed
through major credit reporting agencies, as well as services through which we provide our
scores to clients directly. |
|
|
|
|
Tools. The Tools segment is composed of software tools and associated professional
services that clients can use to create their own custom Decision Management applications. |
7
Our Chief Executive Officer evaluates segment financial performance based on segment revenues
and segment operating income. Segment operating expenses consist of direct and indirect costs
principally related to personnel, facilities, consulting, travel and
depreciation. Indirect costs are allocated to the segments generally based on relative
segment revenues, fixed rates established by management based upon estimated expense contribution
levels and other assumptions that management considers reasonable. We do not allocate share-based
compensation expense, restructuring expense, amortization expense, various corporate charges and
certain other income and expense measures to our segments. These income and expense items are not
allocated because they are not considered in evaluating the segments operating performance. Our
Chief Executive Officer does not evaluate the financial performance of each segment based on its
respective assets or capital expenditures; rather, depreciation amounts are allocated to the
segments from their internal cost centers as described above.
The following tables summarize segment information for the three and six months ended March
31, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications |
|
|
Scores |
|
|
Tools |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Segment revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactional and maintenance |
|
$ |
64,102 |
|
|
$ |
39,894 |
|
|
$ |
7,435 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
111,431 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
23,486 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
2,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,041 |
|
License |
|
|
8,348 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
5,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenues |
|
|
95,936 |
|
|
|
40,960 |
|
|
|
15,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,824 |
|
Segment operating expense |
|
|
(72,262 |
) |
|
|
(15,262 |
) |
|
|
(13,057 |
) |
|
|
(15,425 |
) |
|
|
(116,006 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income |
|
$ |
23,674 |
|
|
$ |
25,698 |
|
|
$ |
2,871 |
|
|
$ |
(15,425 |
) |
|
|
36,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated share-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,171 |
) |
Unallocated amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,933 |
) |
Unallocated restructuring expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,192 |
|
Unallocated interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
Unallocated interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,137 |
) |
Unallocated other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
$ |
3,431 |
|
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
$ |
406 |
|
|
$ |
274 |
|
|
$ |
4,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications |
|
|
Scores |
|
|
Tools |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Segment revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactional and maintenance |
|
$ |
64,703 |
|
|
$ |
41,885 |
|
|
$ |
7,113 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
113,701 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
19,621 |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
3,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,926 |
|
License |
|
|
2,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenues |
|
|
86,896 |
|
|
|
42,534 |
|
|
|
14,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,720 |
|
Segment operating expense |
|
|
(66,342 |
) |
|
|
(15,201 |
) |
|
|
(13,710 |
) |
|
|
(17,489 |
) |
|
|
(112,742 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income |
|
$ |
20,554 |
|
|
$ |
27,333 |
|
|
$ |
580 |
|
|
$ |
(17,489 |
) |
|
|
30,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated share-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,847 |
) |
Unallocated amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,070 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,061 |
|
Unallocated interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507 |
|
Unallocated interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,423 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
$ |
3,770 |
|
|
$ |
338 |
|
|
$ |
530 |
|
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
$ |
4,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications |
|
|
Scores |
|
|
Tools |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Segment revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactional and maintenance |
|
$ |
130,699 |
|
|
$ |
80,399 |
|
|
$ |
15,095 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
226,193 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
48,235 |
|
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
5,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,949 |
|
License |
|
|
14,638 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
12,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenues |
|
|
193,572 |
|
|
|
81,775 |
|
|
|
33,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308,755 |
|
Segment operating expense |
|
|
(146,749 |
) |
|
|
(30,513 |
) |
|
|
(28,147 |
) |
|
|
(30,060 |
) |
|
|
(235,469 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income |
|
$ |
46,823 |
|
|
$ |
51,262 |
|
|
$ |
5,261 |
|
|
$ |
(30,060 |
) |
|
|
73,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated share-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,205 |
) |
Unallocated amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,862 |
) |
Unallocated restructuring expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,391 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,828 |
|
Unallocated interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161 |
|
Unallocated interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,378 |
) |
Unallocated other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
$ |
6,921 |
|
|
$ |
551 |
|
|
$ |
912 |
|
|
$ |
524 |
|
|
$ |
8,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications |
|
|
Scores |
|
|
Tools |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Segment revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactional and maintenance |
|
$ |
131,437 |
|
|
$ |
83,028 |
|
|
$ |
14,342 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
228,807 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
41,083 |
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
8,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,163 |
|
License |
|
|
7,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenues |
|
|
179,768 |
|
|
|
84,087 |
|
|
|
31,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,216 |
|
Segment operating expense |
|
|
(133,522 |
) |
|
|
(29,479 |
) |
|
|
(27,889 |
) |
|
|
(34,015 |
) |
|
|
(224,905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income |
|
$ |
46,246 |
|
|
$ |
54,608 |
|
|
$ |
3,472 |
|
|
$ |
(34,015 |
) |
|
|
70,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated share-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,382 |
) |
Unallocated amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,235 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,694 |
|
Unallocated interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,046 |
|
Unallocated interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,831 |
) |
Unallocated other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
45,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
$ |
7,504 |
|
|
$ |
680 |
|
|
$ |
1,043 |
|
|
$ |
666 |
|
|
$ |
9,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to
transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The
accounting guidance establishes a three-level hierarchy for disclosure that is based on the extent
and level of judgment used to estimate the fair value of assets and liabilities.
|
|
|
Level 1 uses unadjusted quoted prices that are available in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities. Our Level 1
securities are comprised of money market funds and certain equity securities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 uses inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are either
directly or indirectly observable through correlation with market data. These include quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or
similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and inputs to valuation models
or other pricing methodologies that do not require significant judgment because the inputs
used in the model, such as interest rates and volatility, can be corroborated by readily
observable market data. Our Level 2 securities are comprised of U.S. government and
corporate debt obligations that are generally held to maturity. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 uses one or more significant inputs that are unobservable and supported by
little or no market activity, and that reflect the use of significant management judgment.
Level 3 assets and liabilities include those whose fair value measurements are determined
using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar valuation techniques,
and significant management judgment or estimation. We do not have any assets or liabilities
that are valued using inputs identified under a Level 3 hierarchy. |
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table represents financial assets that we measured at fair value on a recurring
basis at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010, respectively:
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Instruments |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Fair Value as of |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents (1) |
|
$ |
150,167 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
150,167 |
|
Marketable securities (3) |
|
|
5,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
155,290 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
155,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Instruments |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Fair Value as of |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
September
30, 2010 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents (1) |
|
$ |
82,545 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
82,545 |
|
U.S. corporate debt (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,981 |
|
|
|
2,981 |
|
Non U.S. corporate debt (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,267 |
|
|
|
17,267 |
|
U.S. government obligations (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,452 |
|
|
|
39,452 |
|
U.S. municipal obligations (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,915 |
|
|
|
8,915 |
|
Marketable securities (3) |
|
|
4,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
86,912 |
|
|
$ |
68,615 |
|
|
$ |
155,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in cash and cash equivalents on our balance sheet at March 31, 2011 and
September 30, 2010. Not included in this table are cash deposits of $108.1 million and
$63.7 million at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Included in marketable securities (current and non-current) on our balance sheet at
September 30, 2010. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents securities held under a supplemental retirement and savings plan for certain
officers and senior management employees, which are distributed upon termination or
retirement of the employees. Included in long-term marketable securities on our balance
sheet at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010. |
Where applicable, we use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
to determine fair value. This pricing applies to our Level 1 investments. To the extent quoted
prices in active markets for assets or liabilities are not available, the valuation techniques used
to measure the fair values of our financial assets incorporate market inputs, which include
reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, benchmark yields, issuer spreads, benchmark securities and
other inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data. This methodology applies to
our Level 2 investments. We have not changed our valuation techniques in measuring the
fair value of any financial assets and liabilities during the period.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
We adopted the remaining provisions of the fair value measurement accounting and disclosure
guidance related to non-financial assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis as of October 1, 2009. Assets and liabilities subject to this new guidance
primarily include goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets measured at fair value for the
purposes of our annual impairment assessment.
8. Derivative Financial Instruments
We use derivative instruments to manage risks caused by fluctuations in foreign exchange
rates. The primary objective of our derivative instruments is to protect the value of foreign
currency denominated accounts receivable and cash balances from the effects of volatility in
foreign exchange rates that might occur prior to conversion to their functional currency. We
principally utilize foreign currency forward contracts, which enable us to buy and sell foreign
currencies in the future at fixed exchange rates and economically offset changes in foreign
currency exchange rates. We routinely enter into contracts to offset exposures denominated in the
British pound, Euro and Canadian dollar.
11
Foreign currency denominated accounts receivable, liabilities and cash balances are
re-measured at foreign currency rates in effect on the balance sheet date with the effects of
changes in foreign currency rates reported in other expense, net. The forward contracts are not
designated as hedges and are marked to market through other expense, net. Fair value changes in
the forward contracts help mitigate the changes in the value of the re-measured accounts receivable
and cash balances attributable to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The forward
contracts are short-term in nature and typically have average maturities at inception of less than
three months.
The following tables summarize the fair value of our derivative instruments and their location
in the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
|
Amount |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
|
Amount |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
The following tables summarize our outstanding forward foreign currency contracts, by currency
at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
Contract Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Foreign Currency |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Sell foreign currency: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian dollar (CAD) |
|
CAD 1,200 |
|
$ |
1,236 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Euro (EUR) |
|
EUR 5,390 |
|
|
7,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buy foreign currency: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
British pound (GBP) |
|
GBP 3,243 |
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Contract Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Foreign Currency |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Sell foreign currency: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian dollar (CAD) |
|
CAD 1,300 |
|
$ |
1,258 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Euro (EUR) |
|
EUR 5,460 |
|
$ |
7,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
Buy foreign currency: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
British pound (GBP) |
|
GBP3,672 |
|
$ |
5,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
The forward foreign currency contracts were all entered into on March 31, 2011 and September
30, 2010, respectively; therefore, their fair value was $0.
12
Gains (losses) on derivative financial instruments are recorded in our consolidated statements
of income as a component of other income (expense), net. These amounts are shown for the quarter
and six months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
(126 |
) |
|
$ |
(344 |
) |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
$ |
(249 |
) |
|
$ |
(124 |
) |
9. Income Taxes
Effective Tax Rate
Our effective tax rate was 29.8% and 32.2% during the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, and 26.8% and 32.7% during the six months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. The provision for income taxes during interim quarterly reporting periods is based on
our estimates of the effective tax rates for the respective full fiscal year.
The effective tax rate in any quarter can be affected positively or negatively by adjustments
that are required to be reported in the specific quarter of resolution. The decrease in our
effective tax rate year over year was due to the recognition of the 2010 extension of the Federal
Research and Development credit and changes in the foreign and domestic earnings mix.
The
total unrecognized tax benefit for uncertain tax positions at
March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010 is estimated
to be approximately $13.0 million and $12.3 million, respectively. We recognize interest expense related to unrecognized tax
benefits and penalties as part of the provision for income taxes in our consolidated statements of
income. As of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010, we have accrued interest of
$1.5 million and $1.4 million, respectively, related to the unrecognized
tax benefits.
10. Revolving Line of Credit
As of March 31, 2011 we had a $200 million unsecured revolving line of credit with a syndicate
of banks that expires on October 20, 2011. Proceeds from the credit facility can be used for
working capital and general corporate purposes and may also be used for the refinancing of existing
debt, acquisitions, and the repurchase of the Companys common stock. Interest on amounts borrowed
under the credit facility is based on (i) a base rate, which is the greater of (a) the prime rate
and (b) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50% or (ii) LIBOR plus an applicable margin. The margin on
LIBOR borrowings ranges from 0.30% to 0.55% and is determined based on our consolidated leverage
ratio. In addition, we must pay utilization fees if borrowings and commitments under the credit
facility exceed 50% of the total credit facility commitment, as well as facility fees. The credit
facility contains certain restrictive covenants, including maintenance of consolidated leverage and
fixed charge coverage ratios. The credit facility also contains covenants typical of unsecured
facilities. As of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010, we had no borrowings outstanding under
the credit facility.
11. Senior Notes
In May 2008, we issued $275 million of Senior Notes in a private placement to a group of
institutional investors. The Senior Notes were issued in four series with maturities ranging from
5 to 10 years. The Senior Notes weighted average interest rate is 6.8% and the weighted average
maturity is 7.9 years. In July 2010, we issued $245 million of Senior Notes in a private placement
to a group of institutional investors. The Senior Notes were issued in four series with maturities
ranging from 5 to 10 years. The Senior Notes weighted average interest rate is 5.2% and the
weighted average maturity is 8.0 years. These Senior Notes are subject to certain restrictive
covenants that are substantially similar to those in the credit agreement for the revolving line of
credit, including maintenance of consolidated leverage and fixed charge coverage ratios. The
purchase agreement for the Senior Notes also includes covenants typical of unsecured facilities.
13
12. Contingencies
We are in disputes with certain customers regarding amounts owed in connection with the sale
of certain of our products and services. We also have had claims asserted by former employees
relating to compensation and other employment matters. We are also involved in various other
claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe that none of these
aforementioned claims or actions will result in a material adverse impact to our consolidated
results of operations, liquidity or financial condition. However, the amount or range of any
potential liabilities associated with these claims and actions, if any, cannot be determined with
certainty. Set forth below are additional details concerning certain ongoing litigation.
Braun Consulting, Inc.
Braun (which we acquired in November 2004) was a defendant in a lawsuit filed on November 26,
2001, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 01 CV
10629) that alleges violations of federal securities laws in connection with Brauns initial public
offering in August 1999. This lawsuit is among approximately 300 coordinated putative class
actions against certain issuers, their officers and directors, and underwriters with respect to
such issuers initial public offerings. As successor-in-interest to Braun, we entered into a
Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement along with most of the other defendant issuers in this
coordinated litigation, where such issuers and their officers and directors would be dismissed with
prejudice, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including approval of the Court.
Under the terms of this Agreement, we would not pay any amount of the settlement. However, since
December 2006, certain procedural matters concerning the class status have been decided in the
district and appellate courts of the Second Circuit, ultimately determining that no class status
exists for the plaintiffs. Since there is no class status, there could be no agreement, thus the
District Court entered an order formally denying the motion for final approval of the settlement
agreement.
On April 2, 2009, a stipulation and agreement of settlement between the plaintiffs, issuer
defendants and underwriter defendants was submitted to the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York for preliminary approval. This settlement requires no financial
contribution from us. The Court granted the plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval and
preliminarily certified the settlement classes on June 10, 2009. The settlement fairness hearing
was held on September 10, 2009. The Court granted the plaintiffs motion for final approval of the
settlement and certified the settlement classes on October 5, 2009. The Court determined that the
settlement is fair to the class members, approved the settlement and dismissed, with prejudice, the
case against the Company and its individual defendants. Notices of appeal of the opinion granting
final approval have been filed. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and because the
settlement remains subject to appeal, the ultimate outcome of the matter is uncertain.
14
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements contained in this Report that are not statements of historical fact should be
considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 (the Act). In addition, certain statements in our future filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), in press releases, and in oral and written statements
made by us or with our approval that are not statements of historical fact constitute
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Act. Examples of forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to: (i) projections of revenue, income or loss, earnings or loss per
share, the payment or nonpayment of dividends, capital structure and other statements concerning
future financial performance; (ii) statements of our plans and objectives by our management or
Board of Directors, including those relating to products or services; (iii) statements of
assumptions underlying such statements; (iv) statements regarding business relationships with
vendors, customers or collaborators; and (v) statements regarding products, their characteristics,
performance, sales potential or effect in the hands of customers. Words such as believes,
anticipates, expects, intends, targeted, should, potential, goals, strategy, and
similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive
means of identifying such statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties
that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in such statements. Factors that
could cause actual results to differ from those discussed in the forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to, those described in Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors. The performance
of our business and our securities may be adversely affected by these factors and by other factors
common to other businesses and investments, or to the general economy. Forward-looking statements
are qualified by some or all of these risk factors. Therefore, you should consider these risk
factors with caution and form your own critical and independent conclusions about the likely effect
of these risk factors on our future performance. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of
the date on which statements are made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking
statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made to
reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or circumstances. Readers should carefully review
the disclosures and the risk factors described in this and other documents we file from time to
time with the SEC, including our reports on Forms 10-Q and 8-K to be filed by the Company in fiscal
2011.
OVERVIEW
We are a leader in Decision Management solutions that enable businesses to automate,
improve and connect decisions to enhance business performance. Our predictive analytics, which
include the industry standard FICO® score, and our Decision Management systems power
billions of customer decisions each year. We help companies acquire customers more efficiently,
increase customer value, reduce fraud and credit losses, lower operating expenses and enter new
markets more profitably. Most leading banks and credit card issuers rely on our solutions, as do
many insurers, retailers, healthcare organizations, pharmaceutical companies and government
agencies. We also serve consumers through online services that enable people to purchase and
understand their FICO® scores, the standard measure in the United States of credit risk,
empowering them to manage their financial health.
Most of our revenues are derived from the sale of products and services within the banking
(including consumer credit) and insurance industries, approximately
78% and 76% of our revenues during the quarters ended March 31,
2011 and 2010, respectively, and 77% of our revenues for the six
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, were derived from within these industries. A significant portion of our
remaining revenues is derived from the healthcare and retail industries. Our clients utilize our
products and services to facilitate a variety of business processes, including customer marketing
and acquisition, account origination, credit and underwriting risk management, fraud loss
prevention and control, and client account and policyholder management. A significant portion of
our revenues is derived from transactional or unit-based software license fees, annual license fees
under long-term software license arrangements, transactional fees derived under scoring, network
service or internal hosted software arrangements, and annual software maintenance fees. The
recurrence of these revenues is, to a significant degree, dependent upon our clients continued
usage of our products and services in their business activities. The more significant activities
underlying the use of our products in these areas include: credit and debit card usage or active
account levels; lending acquisition, origination and customer management activity; and customer
acquisition, cross selling and retention programs. Approximately 73% and 79% of our revenues during
the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and 73% and 78% of our revenues for the
six months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were derived from maintenance or arrangements with
transactional or unit-based pricing. We also derive revenues from other sources which generally do
not recur and include, but are not limited to, perpetual or time-based licenses with upfront
payment terms and non-recurring professional service arrangements.
Our revenues derived from clients outside the United States have generally grown, and may in
the future grow, more rapidly than our revenues from domestic clients. International revenues
totaled $59.3 million and $46.8 million during the quarters ended March
15
31, 2011 and 2010, representing 39% and 33% of total consolidated revenues in each of these
periods. International revenues totaled $116.6 million and $98.4 million during the six months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, representing 38% and 33% of total consolidated revenues in each of
these periods. We expect that the percentage of our revenues derived from international clients
will increase in the future, subject to the impact of foreign currency fluctuations.
Bookings
Management uses bookings as an indicator of our business performance. Bookings represent
contracts signed in the current reporting period that will generate current and future revenue
streams. We consider contract terms, knowledge of the marketplace and experience with our
customers, among other factors, when determining the estimated value of contract bookings.
Bookings calculations have varying degrees of certainty depending on the revenue type and
individual contract terms. Our revenue types are transactional and maintenance, professional
services and license. Our estimate of bookings is as of the end of the period in which a contract
is signed, and we do not update our initial booking estimates in future periods for changes between
estimated and actual results. Actual revenue and the timing thereof could differ materially from
our initial estimates. The following paragraphs discuss the key assumptions used to calculate
bookings and the susceptibility of these assumptions to variability.
Transactional
and Maintenance Bookings
We calculate transactional bookings as the total estimated volume of transactions or number of
accounts under contract, multiplied by a contractual rate. Transactional contracts generally span
multiple years and require us to make estimates about future transaction volumes or number of
active accounts. We develop estimates from discussions with our customers and examinations of
historical data from similar products and customer arrangements. Differences between estimated
bookings and actual results occur due to variability in the volume of transactions or number of
active accounts estimated. This variability is primarily caused by the following:
|
|
|
The health of the economy and economic trends in our customers industries; |
|
|
|
|
Individual performance of our customers relative to their competitors; and |
|
|
|
|
Regulatory and other factors that affect the business environment in which our customers
operate. |
We calculate maintenance bookings directly from the terms stated in the contract.
Professional
Services Bookings
We calculate professional services bookings as the estimated number of hours to complete a
project multiplied by the rate per hour. We estimate the number of hours based on our
understanding of the project scope, conversations with customer personnel and our experience in
estimating professional services projects. Estimated bookings may differ from actual results
primarily due to differences in the actual number of hours incurred. These differences typically
result from customer decisions to alter the mix of FICO and internal services resources used to
complete a project.
License
Bookings
Licenses are sold on a perpetual or term basis and bookings generally equal the fixed amount
stated in the contract.
16
Bookings
Trend Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bookings |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bookings |
|
|
over $1 |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Bookings |
|
|
Yield* |
|
|
Million |
|
|
Term |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(months) |
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
57.7 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
54.3 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
141.7 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
22 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
114.2 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
23 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Bookings yield represents the percentage of revenue recognized from bookings for the period
indicated. |
NM Measure is not meaningful
Transactional and maintenance bookings were 29% and 54% of total bookings for the
quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Professional services bookings were 48% and
34% of total bookings for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. License
bookings were 23% and 12% of total bookings for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
Transactional and maintenance bookings were 48% and 52% of total bookings for the six months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Professional services bookings were 34% and 35% of
total bookings for the six months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. License bookings
were 18% and 13% of total bookings for the six months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The weighted-average term of bookings achieved measures the average term over which the
bookings are expected to be recognized as revenue. As the weighted-average term increases, the
average amount of revenues expected to be realized in a quarter decreases, however, the revenues
are expected to be recognized over a longer period of time. As the weighted-average term
decreases, the average amount of revenues expected to be realized in a quarter increases; however,
the revenues are expected to be recognized over a shorter period of time.
Management regards the volume of bookings achieved, among other factors, as an important
indicator of future revenues, but they are not comparable to, nor should they be substituted for,
an analysis of our revenues, and they are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties concerning
timing and contingencies affecting product delivery and performance.
Although many of our contracts contain noncancelable terms, most of our bookings are
transactional or service related and are dependent upon estimates such as volume of transactions,
number of active accounts, or number of hours incurred. Since these estimates cannot be considered
fixed or firm, we do not believe it is appropriate to characterize bookings as backlog.
Current Business Environment
General economic conditions have stabilized, however, high levels of unemployment and a
difficult housing market continue to impact our customers in the United States and the pace of
global recovery is likely to be modest across the geographical markets we serve. During the latter
half of fiscal 2010 our business stabilized and we currently see signs of gradual improvement. We
will continue to manage our expenses in an effort to maintain solid earnings and cash flows. We
also plan to continue to invest in our Decision Management solutions as well as our core business
operations to drive revenue growth.
The mixed economic conditions impacted the estimates used in our July 1, 2010 annual goodwill
impairment testing, and in particular, for our Applications segment, which had $448.0 million in
goodwill as of July 1, 2010. If market conditions decline more quickly than we can reduce costs,
our margins will decrease and we may experience a decline in the fair value of our reporting units.
Such declines in fair value may require us to record an impairment charge related to goodwill.
17
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Revenues
The following table sets forth certain summary information on a segment basis related to our
revenues for the fiscal periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, |
|
|
Percentage of Revenues |
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Segment |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Applications |
|
$ |
95,936 |
|
|
$ |
86,896 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
$ |
9,040 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Scores |
|
|
40,960 |
|
|
|
42,534 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
(1,574 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
Tools |
|
|
15,928 |
|
|
|
14,290 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
1,638 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
152,824 |
|
|
$ |
143,720 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
9,104 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
Percentage of Revenues |
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Segment |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Applications |
|
$ |
193,572 |
|
|
$ |
179,768 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
61 |
% |
|
$ |
13,804 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Scores |
|
|
81,775 |
|
|
|
84,087 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
(2,312 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
Tools |
|
|
33,408 |
|
|
|
31,361 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
2,047 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
308,755 |
|
|
$ |
295,216 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
13,539 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, 2011 Compared to Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 Revenues
Applications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, |
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Applications |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Transactional and maintenance |
|
$ |
64,102 |
|
|
$ |
64,703 |
|
|
$ |
(601 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
Professional services |
|
|
23,486 |
|
|
|
19,621 |
|
|
|
3,865 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
License |
|
|
8,348 |
|
|
|
2,572 |
|
|
|
5,776 |
|
|
|
225 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
95,936 |
|
|
$ |
86,896 |
|
|
|
9,040 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications segment revenues increased $9.0 million due to a $5.3 million increase in
our fraud solutions, a $2.8 million increase in our originations solutions and a $0.9 million
increase in our other applications solutions.
The increase in fraud solutions revenues was primarily due to an increase in license sales and
an increase in volumes associated with transactional-based revenues. The increase in originations
solutions was attributable to an increase in license sales and an increase in professional services
revenue from software implementations.
18
Scores
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, |
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Scores |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Transactional and maintenance |
|
$ |
39,894 |
|
|
$ |
41,885 |
|
|
$ |
(1,991 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
Professional services |
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
License |
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
40,960 |
|
|
$ |
42,534 |
|
|
|
(1,574 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scores
segment revenues decreased $1.6 million primarily due to a decrease in our
business-to-business Scores revenue and our myFICO business-to-consumer services revenue. The
decline in our business-to-business Scores was primarily due to a decrease in volume of
transactional revenues derived from the credit reporting agencies. The decrease in our
business-to-consumer services was primarily attributable to a decrease in transaction volumes
from our bureau channel partner selling FICO scores to consumers, which was partially offset by an
increase in revenue generated from direct sales to consumers.
During the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, revenues generated from our agreements with
Equifax, TransUnion and Experian, collectively accounted for approximately 18% and 21%,
respectively, of our total revenues, including revenues from these customers that are recorded in
our other segments.
Tools
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, |
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Tools |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Transactional and maintenance |
|
$ |
7,435 |
|
|
$ |
7,113 |
|
|
$ |
322 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Professional services |
|
|
2,825 |
|
|
|
3,656 |
|
|
|
(831 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
)% |
License |
|
|
5,668 |
|
|
|
3,521 |
|
|
|
2,147 |
|
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,928 |
|
|
$ |
14,290 |
|
|
|
1,638 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tools segment revenues increased $1.6 million primarily due to an increase of license
sales related to our Decision Optimizer and Blaze Advisor products.
19
Six Months Ended March 31, 2011 Compared to Six Months Ended March 31, 2010 Revenues
Applications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Applications |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Transactional and maintenance |
|
$ |
130,699 |
|
|
$ |
131,437 |
|
|
$ |
(738 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
Professional services |
|
|
48,235 |
|
|
|
41,083 |
|
|
|
7,152 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
License |
|
|
14,638 |
|
|
|
7,248 |
|
|
|
7,390 |
|
|
|
102 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
193,572 |
|
|
$ |
179,768 |
|
|
|
13,804 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications segment revenues increased $13.8 million due to a $10.4 million increase in
our fraud solutions, a $4.5 million increase in our originations solutions and a $2.0 million
increase in marketing solutions. This revenue increase was partially offset by a $2.7 million
decrease in customer management solutions and a $0.4 million decrease in our other applications
solutions.
The increase in fraud solutions revenues was primarily due to an increase in volumes
associated with transactional-based revenues and an increase in license sales. The increase in
originations solutions was attributable to an increase in license sales and an increase in
professional services revenue from software implementations. The increase in marketing solutions
was attributable to an increase in professional services revenue. The decrease in customer solutions was
attributable to a decrease in transactional-based revenues.
Scores
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Scores |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Transactional and maintenance |
|
$ |
80,399 |
|
|
$ |
83,028 |
|
|
$ |
(2,629 |
) |
|
|
(3) |
% |
Professional services |
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(8) |
% |
License |
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
81,775 |
|
|
$ |
84,087 |
|
|
|
(2,312 |
) |
|
|
(3) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scores segment revenues decreased $2.3 million primarily due to a decrease in our
business-to-business Scores revenue and our myFICO business-to-consumer services revenue. The
decline in our business-to-business Scores was primarily due to a decrease in volume of
transactional revenues derived from the credit reporting agencies. The decrease in our
business-to-consumer services was primarily attributable to a decrease in transaction volumes
from our channel partner selling FICO scores to consumers, which was partially offset by an
increase in revenue generated from direct sales to consumers.
During the six months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, revenues generated from our agreements
with Equifax, TransUnion and Experian, collectively accounted for approximately 18% and 20%, respectively, of our total
revenues, including revenues from these customers that are recorded in our other segments.
20
Tools
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Tools |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Transactional and maintenance |
|
$ |
15,095 |
|
|
$ |
14,342 |
|
|
$ |
753 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Professional services |
|
|
5,745 |
|
|
|
8,021 |
|
|
|
(2,276 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
)% |
License |
|
|
12,568 |
|
|
|
8,998 |
|
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
33,408 |
|
|
$ |
31,361 |
|
|
|
2,047 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tools segment revenues increased $2.0 million primarily due to an increase of license
sales related to our Decision Optimizer and Blaze Advisor products.
Operating Expenses and Other Income (Expense)
The following table sets forth certain summary information related to our statements of income
for the fiscal periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, |
|
|
Percentage of Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
Period-to-Period Percentage |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except employees) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except employees) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
152,824 |
|
|
$ |
143,720 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
9,104 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
48,506 |
|
|
|
44,641 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
3,865 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
16,222 |
|
|
|
19,251 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
(3,029 |
) |
|
|
(16) |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
55,449 |
|
|
|
53,697 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Amortization of intangible
assets |
|
|
1,933 |
|
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(1,137 |
) |
|
|
(37) |
% |
Restructuring |
|
|
11,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
11,522 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
133,632 |
|
|
|
120,659 |
|
|
|
87 |
% |
|
|
84 |
% |
|
|
12,973 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
19,192 |
|
|
|
23,061 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
(3,869 |
) |
|
|
(17) |
% |
Interest income |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
(89) |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(8,137 |
) |
|
|
(5,423 |
) |
|
|
(6) |
% |
|
|
(4) |
% |
|
|
(2,714 |
) |
|
|
50 |
% |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
(1,105 |
) |
|
|
(108) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
before income taxes |
|
|
11,034 |
|
|
|
19,172 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
(8,138 |
) |
|
|
(42) |
% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
3,289 |
|
|
|
6,180 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
(2,891 |
) |
|
|
(47) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
7,745 |
|
|
$ |
12,992 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
(5,247 |
) |
|
|
(40) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees at quarter
end |
|
|
2,033 |
|
|
|
2,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
(5) |
% |
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
Percentage of Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
Period-to-Period Percentage |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
308,755 |
|
|
$ |
295,216 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
13,539 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
94,309 |
|
|
|
87,160 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
7,149 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
34,283 |
|
|
|
38,227 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
(3,944 |
) |
|
|
(10) |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
115,082 |
|
|
|
108,900 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
6,182 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Amortization of intangible
assets |
|
|
3,862 |
|
|
|
6,235 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(2,373 |
) |
|
|
(38) |
% |
Restructuring |
|
|
12,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
12,391 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
259,927 |
|
|
|
240,522 |
|
|
|
84 |
% |
|
|
81 |
% |
|
|
19,405 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
48,828 |
|
|
|
54,694 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
(5,866 |
) |
|
|
(11) |
% |
Interest income |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
1,046 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(885 |
) |
|
|
(85) |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(16,378 |
) |
|
|
(10,831 |
) |
|
|
(5) |
% |
|
|
(4) |
% |
|
|
(5,547 |
) |
|
|
51 |
% |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(800 |
) |
|
|
(124) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
before income taxes |
|
|
32,457 |
|
|
|
45,555 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
(13,098 |
) |
|
|
(29) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
8,703 |
|
|
|
14,877 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
(6,174 |
) |
|
|
(42) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
23,754 |
|
|
$ |
30,678 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
(6,924 |
) |
|
|
(23) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues consists primarily of employee salaries and benefits for personnel directly
involved in developing, installing and supporting revenue products; travel costs; overhead costs;
costs of computer service bureaus; internal network hosting costs; amounts payable to credit
reporting agencies for scores; software costs; and expenses related to our business-to-consumer
services.
The
quarter over quarter increase of $3.9 million in cost of revenues resulted from a $3.7
million increase in personnel and labor costs and a $0.2 million increase in other expenses. The
increase in personnel and other labor-related costs was attributable to an increase in salary and
related benefit costs.
The year-to-date period over period increase of $7.1 million in cost of revenues resulted from
an $5.5 million increase in personnel and labor costs, a $1.4 million increase in third party
software and data cost and a $0.2 million increase in other expenses. The increase in personnel
and other labor-related costs was attributable to an increase in salary and related benefit costs.
The increase in third party software and data costs was attributable to increased sales that
require data acquisition.
Over the next several quarters, we expect that cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues
will be consistent or slightly lower than those incurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses include the personnel and related overhead costs incurred in
the development of new products and services, including the research of mathematical and
statistical models and the development of new versions of Applications and Tools products.
The quarter over quarter decrease of $3.0 million in research and development expenditures was
attributable primarily to a $2.5 million decrease in personnel and related costs and a $0.5 million
decrease in other expenses. The decrease in personnel and related costs was due to decreased
salary and incentive expenses for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
The year-to-date period over period decrease of $3.9 million in research and development
expenditures was attributable primarily to a $4.0 million decrease in personnel and related costs
partially offset by a $0.1 million increase in other expenses. The decrease in personnel and
related costs was due to decreased salary and incentive expenses for
the six months ended March 31,
2011.
22
Over the next several quarters, we expect that research and development expenditures as a
percentage of revenues will be slightly lower than those incurred during the quarter ended March
31, 2011.
Selling, General and Administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist principally of employee salaries and
benefits, travel, overhead, advertising and other promotional expenses, corporate facilities
expenses, legal expenses, business development expenses, and the cost of operating computer
systems.
The quarter over quarter increase of $1.8 million in selling, general and administrative
expenses was attributable to a $3.1 million increase in personnel and related costs and a $0.4
increase in other costs, offset by a $1.7 million decrease in professional fees. The increase in
personnel and related cost was due to increase salary and commission expenses. The decrease in
professional fees was primarily due to decreased legal fees.
The year-to-date period over period increase of $6.2 million in selling, general and
administrative expenses was attributable to a $9.3 million increase in personnel and related costs
and a $0.7 million increase in other costs, partially offset by a $2.4 million decrease in
professional fees and a $1.4 million decrease in marketing expenses. The increase in personnel and
related cost was due to increased salary and commission expenses. The decrease in marketing
expenses was due to a reduction in marketing programs. The decrease in professional fees was
primarily due to decreased legal fees.
Over the next several quarters, we expect that selling, general and administrative expenses as
a percentage of revenues will be slightly lower than those incurred during the
quarter ended March 31, 2011.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Amortization of intangible assets consists of amortization expense related to intangible
assets recorded in connection with acquisitions accounted for by the purchase method of accounting.
Our definite-lived intangible assets, consisting primarily of completed technology and customer
contracts and relationships, are being amortized using the straight-line method or based on
forecasted cash flows associated with the assets over periods ranging from two to fifteen years.
Over the next several quarters we expect that amortization expense will be consistent with the
amortization expense we recorded during the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
Restructuring
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, in connection with our reengineering initiative, we
incurred net charges totaling $11.5 million consisting mainly of $8.2 million for severance costs
associated with the reduction of 177 positions throughout the company and $3.3 million of costs for
vacating excess leased space.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, we incurred net charges totaling $0.9 million
consisting of costs for vacating excess leased space.
Interest Income
Interest income is derived primarily from the investment of funds in excess of our immediate
operating requirements. The quarter over quarter decrease in interest income of $0.5 million was
attributable to lower investment balances and a decline in interest rates and investment income
yields due to market conditions.
The year-to-date period over period decrease in interest income of $0.9 million was
attributable to lower investment balances and a decline in interest rates and investment income
yields due to market conditions.
Interest Expense
The quarter over quarter increase in interest expense of $2.7 million was primarily due to
the interest expense recorded on our $245 million Senior Notes issued in July 2010.
23
The year-to-date period over period increase in interest expense of $5.5 million was primarily
due to the interest expense recorded on our $245 million Senior Notes issued in July 2010.
Over the next several quarters we expect that interest expense will be consistent with levels
recorded during the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other
income (expense), net consists primarily of realized investment gains/losses, exchange rate
gains/losses resulting from re-measurement of foreign-denominated receivable and cash balances into
the U.S. dollar functional currency at period-end market rates, net of the impact of offsetting
forward exchange contracts, and other non-operating items.
Other income (expense), net in the quarter ended March 31, 2011, primarily consisted of foreign
exchange currency losses of $0.3 million. In the quarter ended March 31, 2010, other income (expense), net
resulted from the sale of assets of $0.9 million.
Other income (expense), net in the six months ended March 31, 2011, primarily consisted of foreign
exchange currency losses of $0.5 million. In the six months ended March 31, 2010, other income (expense),
net consisted of gains on the sale of assets of $0.9 million and foreign exchange currency losses
of $0.5 million.
Provision for Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate was 29.8% and 32.2% during the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, and 26.8% and 32.7% during the six months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. The provision for income taxes during interim quarterly reporting periods is based
on our estimates of the effective tax rates for the respective full fiscal year. The tax rate in
any quarter can be affected positively or negatively by adjustments that are required to be
reported in the specific quarter of resolution. Our effective tax rate for the quarter and six
months ended March 31, 2010, was positively affected by the reinstatement of the Federal Research
and Development credit and changes in the foreign and domestic earnings mix.
Operating Income
The following table sets forth certain summary information on a segment basis related to our
operating income for the fiscal periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Period-to-Period Percentage Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Applications |
|
$ |
23,674 |
|
|
$ |
20,554 |
|
|
$ |
3,120 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Scores |
|
|
25,698 |
|
|
|
27,333 |
|
|
|
(1,635 |
) |
|
|
(6) |
% |
Tools |
|
|
2,871 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
2,291 |
|
|
|
395 |
% |
Corporate expenses |
|
|
(15,425 |
) |
|
|
(17,489 |
) |
|
|
2,064 |
|
|
|
(12) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating income |
|
|
36,818 |
|
|
|
30,978 |
|
|
|
5,840 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
Unallocated share-based compensation |
|
|
(4,171 |
) |
|
|
(4,847 |
) |
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
(14) |
% |
Unallocated amortization expense |
|
|
(1,933 |
) |
|
|
(3,070 |
) |
|
|
1,137 |
|
|
|
(37) |
% |
Unallocated restructuring |
|
|
(11,522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,522 |
) |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
19,192 |
|
|
$ |
23,061 |
|
|
|
(3,869 |
) |
|
|
(17) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-to-Period |
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Period-to-Period Percentage Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Applications |
|
$ |
46,823 |
|
|
$ |
46,246 |
|
|
$ |
577 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Scores |
|
|
51,262 |
|
|
|
54,608 |
|
|
|
(3,346 |
) |
|
|
(6) |
% |
Tools |
|
|
5,261 |
|
|
|
3,472 |
|
|
|
1,789 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
Corporate expenses |
|
|
(30,060 |
) |
|
|
(34,015 |
) |
|
|
3,955 |
|
|
|
(12) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating income |
|
|
73,286 |
|
|
|
70,311 |
|
|
|
2,975 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Unallocated share-based compensation |
|
|
(8,205 |
) |
|
|
(9,382 |
) |
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
(13) |
% |
Unallocated amortization expense |
|
|
(3,862 |
) |
|
|
(6,235 |
) |
|
|
2,373 |
|
|
|
(38) |
% |
Unallocated restructuring |
|
|
(12,391 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,391 |
) |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
48,828 |
|
|
$ |
54,694 |
|
|
|
(5,866 |
) |
|
|
(11) |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The quarter over quarter $3.9 million decrease in operating income was attributable to an
increase in restructuring expenses and an increase in segment operating expenses, partially offset
by an increase in segment revenues and a decrease in amortization, corporate overhead and
share-based compensation expenses.
At
the segment level, the $5.8 million increase in segment operating income was driven by a $3.1 million
increase in segment operating income in our Applications segment, a $2.3 million increase in
segment operating income in our Tools segment and a $2.1 million decrease in corporate overhead
expenses, partially offset by a $1.6 million decrease in our Scores segment operating income.
The increase in Applications segment operating income was attributable to an increase in
revenues.
The increase in Tools segment operating income was attributable to an increase in revenues.
The decrease in Scores segment operating income was attributable primarily to a decline in
revenues derived from business-to-business services and business-to-consumer services and
an increase in digital marketing and third party data costs.
The decrease in corporate expenses was due to facility consolidations, driven by our
reengineering initiative.
The
year-to-date period over period decrease of $5.9 million in
operating income was attributable to
an increase in restructuring expenses, an increase in segment operating expenses and a decrease in
segment revenues, partially offset by a decrease in amortization, corporate overhead and
share-based compensation expenses.
At
the segment level, the $3.0 million increase in segment operating income was driven by a $1.8 million
increase in our Tools segment, a $0.6 million increase in our Applications segment and a $4.0
million decrease in corporate overhead expenses, partially offset by a $3.3 million decrease in
segment operating income in our Scores segment.
The increase in Tools segment operating income was attributable to an increase in revenues.
The increase in Applications segment operating income was attributable to an increase in
revenues.
The decrease in Scores segment operating income was attributable primarily a decline in
revenues derived from business-to-business services and business-to-consumer services and
an increase in digital marketing and third party data costs.
The decrease in corporate expenses was due to facility consolidations, driven by our
reengineering initiative.
25
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Our primary method for funding operations and growth has been through cash flows generated
from operating activities. Net cash provided by operating activities decreased to $59.6 million
during the six months ended March 31, 2011 from $70.0 million during the six months ended March 31,
2010. The decrease in operating cash flows was primarily due to a decrease in net income and a
decrease in the liability for compensation and employee benefits,
which was primarily due to the timing of
payments. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable, prepaid
expenses and other assets and an increase in accounts payable and deferred revenue.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash provided by investing activities totaled $63.2 million during the six months ended
March 31, 2011, compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $1.4 million in the six
months ended March 31, 2010. The change in cash flows from investing activities was primarily
attributable to $68.2 million in proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities, net
of purchases, during the six months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $8.9 million of proceeds from
sales and maturities of marketable securities,
net of purchases for the six months ended March 31, 2011.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $12.9 million in the six months ended March 31,
2011, compared to net cash used in financing activities of $56.2 million in the six months ended
March 31, 2010. The change in cash flows from financing activities was primarily due to $19.3
million of common stock repurchased in the six months ended March 31, 2011 versus $57.5 million of
common stock repurchased in the six months ended March 31, 2010.
Repurchases of Common Stock
In June 2010, our Board of Directors approved a common stock repurchase program that allows us
to purchase shares of our common stock up to an aggregate cost of $250.0 million. From time to
time, we repurchase our common stock in the open market pursuant to this program. During the three
and six months ended March 31, 2011, we repurchased 629,100 shares of our common stock for $17.1
million and 642,300 shares of our common stock for $17.4 million, respectively. As of March 31,
2011, we had $157.3 million remaining under this authorization.
Dividends
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, we paid a quarterly dividend of two cents per common
share, which is representative of the eight cents per year dividend we have paid in recent years.
Our dividend rate is set by the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis taking into account a
variety of factors, including among others, our operating results and cash flows, general economic
and industry conditions, our obligations, changes in applicable tax laws and other factors deemed
relevant by the Board. Although we expect to continue to pay dividends at the current rate, our
dividend rate is subject to change from time to time based on the Boards business judgment with
respect to these and other relevant factors.
Revolving Line of Credit
We have a $200 million unsecured revolving line of credit with a syndicate of banks that
expires in October 2011. Proceeds from the revolving line of credit can be used for working
capital and general corporate purposes and may also be used for the refinancing of existing debt,
acquisitions, and the repurchase of the Companys common stock. Interest on amounts borrowed under
the revolving line of credit is based on (i) a base rate, which is the greater of (a) the prime
rate and (b) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50% or (ii) LIBOR plus an applicable margin. The margin
on LIBOR borrowings ranges from 0.30% to 0.55% and is determined based on our consolidated leverage
ratio. In addition, we must pay utilization fees if borrowings and commitments under the revolving
line of credit exceed 50% of the total commitment, as well as facility fees. The revolving line of
credit contains certain restrictive covenants, including maintenance of consolidated leverage and
fixed charge coverage ratios. The revolving line of credit also contains covenants typical of
unsecured facilities. As of March 31, 2011 we were in compliance with all covenants under the
revolving line of credit and we had no borrowings outstanding under the credit facility.
26
Senior Notes
In May 2008, we issued $275 million of Senior Notes in a private placement to a group of
institutional investors. These Senior Notes weighted average interest rate is 6.8% and the
weighted average maturity is 7.9 years. On July 14, 2010, we issued $245 million of Senior Notes
in a private placement to a group of institutional investors. These Senior Notes have a weighted
average interest rate of 5.20% and a weighted average maturity of 8 years. All of the Senior Notes
are subject to certain restrictive covenants that are substantially similar to those in the credit
agreement for the revolving credit facility, including maintenance of consolidated leverage and
fixed charge coverage ratios. The purchase agreements for the Senior Notes also includes covenants
typical of unsecured facilities. As of March 31, 2011 we were in compliance with all covenants
under these facilities.
Capital Resources and Liquidity Outlook
As of March 31, 2011, we had $263.4 million in cash, cash equivalents and marketable security
investments. We believe that these balances, as well as available borrowings from our $200 million
revolving line of credit and anticipated cash flows from operating activities, will be sufficient
to fund our working and other capital requirements and any scheduled repayments of existing debt
over the course of the next twelve months. Under our current financing arrangements we have no
significant debt obligations maturing
until May 2013. In the normal course of business, we evaluate the merits of acquiring
technology or businesses, or establishing strategic relationships with or investing in these
businesses. We may elect to use available cash and cash equivalents and marketable security
investments to fund such activities in the future. In the event additional needs for cash arise, or
if we refinance our existing debt, we may raise additional funds from a combination of sources,
including the potential issuance of debt or equity securities. Additional financing might not be
available on terms favorable to us, or at all. If adequate funds were not available or were not
available on acceptable terms, our ability to take advantage of unanticipated opportunities or
respond to competitive pressures could be limited.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a
current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition,
revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. These accounting principles require management to make certain judgments and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We periodically evaluate our
estimates including those relating to revenue recognition, the allowance for doubtful accounts,
goodwill and other intangible assets resulting from business acquisitions, share-based
compensation, income taxes and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical
experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable based on the specific
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of
certain assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may
differ from these estimates.
We believe the following critical accounting policies involve the most significant judgments
and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
Revenue Recognition
Software Licenses
Software license fee revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
software is made available to our customers, the fee is fixed or determinable and collection is
probable. The determination of whether fees are fixed or determinable and collection is probable
involves the use of assumptions. If at the outset of an arrangement we determine that the
arrangement fee is not fixed or determinable, revenue is deferred until the arrangement fee becomes
fixed or determinable, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. If at the
outset of an arrangement we determine that collectability is not probable, revenue is deferred
until the earlier of when collectability becomes probable or the receipt of payment. If there is
uncertainty as to the customers acceptance of our deliverables, revenue is not recognized until
the earlier of receipt of customer acceptance, expiration of the acceptance period, or when we can
demonstrate we meet the acceptance criteria. We evaluate contract terms and customer information
to ensure that these criteria are met prior to our recognition of license fee revenue.
27
We use the residual method to recognize revenue when a software arrangement includes one or
more elements to be delivered at a future date and vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of
the fair value of all undelivered elements exists. VSOE of fair value is based on the normal
pricing practices for those products and services when sold separately by us and customer renewal
rates for post-contract customer support services. Under the residual method, the fair value of the
undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is recognized as
revenue. If evidence of the fair value of one or more undelivered elements does not exist, the
revenue is deferred and recognized when delivery of those elements occurs or when fair value can be
established. Changes to the elements in a software arrangement, the ability to identify VSOE for
those elements, the fair value of the respective elements, and change to a products estimated life
cycle could materially impact the amount of earned and unearned revenue.
When software licenses are sold together with implementation or consulting services, license
fees are recognized upon delivery provided that the above criteria are met, payment of the license
fees is not dependent upon the performance of the services, and the services do not provide
significant customization or modification of the software products and are not essential to the
functionality of the software that was delivered. For arrangements with services that are essential
to the functionality of the software, the license and related service revenues are recognized using
contract accounting as described below.
Revenues from post-contract customer support services, such as software maintenance, are
recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the support period. The majority of our
software maintenance agreements provide technical support as well as unspecified software product
upgrades and releases when and if made available by us during the term of the support period.
Transactional-based Revenues
Transactional-based revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
fees are fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. Revenues from our credit
scoring, data processing, data management and internet delivery services are recognized as these
services are performed. Revenues from transactional or unit-based license fees under software
license arrangements, network service and internally-hosted software agreements are recognized
based on minimum contractual amounts or on system usage that exceeds minimum contractual amounts.
Certain of our transactional-based revenues are based on transaction or active account volumes as
reported by our clients. In instances where volumes are reported to us in arrears, we estimate
volumes based on preliminary customer transaction information or average actual reported volumes
for an immediate trailing period. Differences between our estimates and actual final volumes
reported are recorded in the period in which actual volumes are reported. We have not experienced
significant variances between our estimates and actual reported volumes in the past and anticipate
that we will be able to continue to make reasonable estimates in the future. If for some reason we
were unable to reasonably estimate transaction volumes in the future, revenue may be deferred until
actual customer data is received, and this could have a material impact on our consolidated results
of operations.
Consulting Services
We provide consulting, training, model development and software integration services under
both hourly-based time and materials and fixed-priced contracts. Revenues from these services are
generally recognized as the services are performed. For fixed-price service contracts, we apply the
percentage-of-completion method of contract accounting to determine progress towards completion,
which requires the use of estimates. In such instances, management is required to estimate the
input measures, generally based on hours incurred to date compared to total estimated hours of the
project, with consideration also given to output measures, such as contract milestones, when
applicable. Adjustments to estimates are made in the period in which the facts requiring such
revisions become known and, accordingly, recognized revenues and profits are subject to revisions
as the contract progresses to completion. Estimated losses, if any, are recorded in the period in
which current estimates of total contract revenue and contract costs indicate a loss. If
substantive uncertainty related to customer acceptance of services exists, we apply the completed
contract method of accounting and defer the associated revenue until the contract is completed. If
we are unable to accurately estimate the input measures used for percentage-of-completion
accounting, revenue would be deferred until the contract is complete, and this could have a
material impact on our consolidated results of operations.
Hosting Services
We are an application service provider (ASP), where we provide hosting services that allow
customers access to software that resides on our servers. The ASP model typically includes an
up-front fee and a monthly commitment from the customer that commences upon completion of the
implementation through the remainder of the contractual term. The up-front fee is the initial setup
fee, or the implementation fee. The monthly commitment includes, but is not limited to, a fixed
monthly fee or a transactional fee based on system usage that exceeds monthly minimums. Revenue is
recognized from ASP when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the service has been
provided to the customer, the amount of fees is fixed or determinable and the collection of the
Companys fees is probable. We do not view the activities of signing the contract or providing
initial setup services as discrete
28
earnings events. Revenue is deferred until the date the customer
commences use of our services at which point the up-front fees are recognized ratably over the
contractual term of the customer arrangement. ASP transactional fees are recorded monthly as
earned.
Non-Software Multiple-Deliverable Arrangements
Each deliverable within a multiple-deliverable revenue arrangement is accounted for as a
separate unit of accounting if the following criteria are met: (i) the delivered item or items
have value to the customer on a standalone basis and (ii) for an arrangement that includes a
general right of return relative to the delivered item(s), delivery or performance of the
undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in our control. We consider a
deliverable to have standalone value if we sell this item separately or if the item is sold by
another vendor or could be resold by the customer. Further, our revenue arrangements generally do
not include a general right of return relative to delivered products. Revenue for multiple element
arrangements is allocated to the software and non-software deliverables based on a relative selling
price. We use VSOE in our allocation of arrangement consideration when it is available. We define
VSOE as a median price of recent standalone transactions that are priced within a narrow range, as
defined by us. If a product or service is seldom sold separately, it is unlikely that we can
determine VSOE. In circumstances when VSOE does not exist, we then assess whether we can obtain
third-party evidence (TPE) of the selling price. It may be difficult for us to obtain
sufficient information on competitor pricing to substantiate TPE and therefore we may not always be
able to use TPE. When we are unable to establish selling price using VSOE or TPE, we use estimated
selling price (ESP) in its allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of ESP is to
determine the price at which we would transact if the product or service were sold by us on a
standalone basis. Our determination of ESP involves weighting several factors based on the
specific facts and circumstances of each arrangement. The factors include, but are not limited to,
geographies, market conditions, gross margin objectives, pricing practices and controls and
customer segment pricing strategies and the product lifecycle. We analyze selling prices used in
our allocation of arrangement consideration on an annual basis, or more frequently if necessary.
Selling prices will be analyzed more frequently if a significant change in our business
necessitates a more timely analysis or if we experience significant variances in our selling
prices.
Gross vs. Net Revenue Reporting
We apply accounting guidance to determine whether we report revenue for certain transactions
based upon the gross amount billed to the customer, or the net amount retained by us. In accordance
with the guidance we record revenue on a gross basis for sales in which we have acted as the
principal and on a net basis for those sales in which we have in substance acted as an agent or
broker in the transaction.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We make estimates regarding the collectability of our accounts receivable. When we evaluate
the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts, we analyze specific accounts receivable
balances, historical bad debts, customer creditworthiness, current economic trends and changes in
our customer payment cycles. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of expense
for any period if we were to make different judgments or utilize different estimates. If the
financial condition of our customers deteriorates resulting in an impairment of their ability to
make payments, additional allowances might be required.
Business Acquisitions; Valuation of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Our business acquisitions typically result in the recognition of goodwill and other intangible
assets, which affect the amount of current and future period charges and amortization expense.
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired,
including identified intangible assets, in connection with our business combinations accounted for
by the purchase method of accounting. We amortize our definite-lived intangible assets based on
forecasted cash flows associated with the assets over the estimated useful lives. Goodwill is not
amortized, but is assessed at least annually for impairment.
The determination of the value of these components of a business combination, as well as
associated asset useful lives, requires management to make various estimates and assumptions.
Critical estimates in valuing certain of the intangible assets include but are not limited to:
future expected cash flows from product sales and services, maintenance agreements, consulting
contracts, customer contracts, and acquired developed technologies and patents or trademarks; the
acquired companys brand awareness and market position, as well as assumptions about the period of
time the acquired products and services will continue to be used in our product portfolio; and
discount rates. Managements estimates of fair value and useful lives are based upon assumptions
believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. Unanticipated
events and circumstances may occur and assumptions may change. Estimates using different
assumptions could also produce significantly different results.
We continually review the events and circumstances related to our financial performance and
economic environment for factors that would provide evidence of the impairment of our intangible
assets. When impairment indicators are identified with respect to our
29
previously recorded
intangible assets with finite useful lives, we test for impairment using undiscounted cash flows.
If such tests indicate impairment, then we measure the impairment as the difference between the
carrying value of the asset and the fair value of the asset, which is measured using discounted
cash flows. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are assessed annually for impairment by comparing
the fair value of such intangible assets, measured using discounted cash flows, to the respective
fair value. To the extent the fair value is less than the associated carrying value, impairment is
recorded. Significant management judgment is required in forecasting future operating results,
which are used in the preparation of the projected discounted cash flows and should different
conditions prevail, material write downs of net intangible assets and other long-lived assets could
occur. We periodically review the estimated remaining useful lives of our acquired intangible
assets. A reduction in our estimate of remaining useful lives, if any, could result in increased
amortization expense in future periods.
We test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level at least annually during the
fourth quarter of each fiscal year and more frequently if impairment indicators are identified. We
have determined that our reporting units are the same as our reportable segments. The first step of
the goodwill impairment test is a comparison of the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying
value. We estimate the fair values of our reporting units using the discounted cash flow valuation
model and by comparing our reporting units to guideline publicly-traded companies. The two
valuation methodologies are generally weighted equally in our final fair value
calculation. These methods require estimates of our future revenues, profits, capital
expenditures, working capital, costs of capital and other relevant factors, as well as selecting
appropriate guideline publicly-traded companies for each reporting unit. We estimate these amounts
by evaluating historical trends, current budgets, operating plans, industry data, and other
relevant factors. In addition, we compare the aggregate reporting unit fair values to our market
capitalization.
The estimated fair value of each of our reporting units exceeded its respective carrying value
in fiscal 2010, indicating the underlying goodwill of each reporting unit was not impaired as of
our most recent testing date. Accordingly, we were not required to complete the second step of the
goodwill impairment test. As of July 1, 2010, the estimated fair value of our Applications
reporting unit was 110% of carrying value. Total goodwill allocated to the reporting unit was
$448.0 million as of July 1, 2010.
In a discounted cash flow valuation analysis, key assumptions that require significant
management judgment include revenue growth rates and weighted average cost of capital. In our
analysis, revenue growth rates were primarily based on third party studies of industry growth rates
for each of our reporting units. Within each reporting unit, management refined these estimates
based on their knowledge of the product, the needs of our customers and expected market
opportunity. The key uncertainty for revenue growth in the Applications reporting unit is the
recovery of the consumer credit industry over the next several years. The weighted average cost of
capital was determined based on publicly available data such as the long-term yield on U.S.
treasury bonds, the expected rate of return on high quality bonds and the returns and betas of
various equity instruments. As it relates to the market approach, there is less management
judgment in determining the fair value of our reporting units other than selecting which guideline
publicly-traded companies are included in our peer group.
For the fiscal 2010 impairment assessment our Applications reporting unit revenue terminal
growth rate was 3% and our weighted average cost of capital was 11%. A decline in cash flow of
13.5% due to a reduction in revenues, or margins achieved, as compared to our forecast would have
caused the Applications reporting unit to fail step one of our annual impairment test. In
addition, a 1.3 percentage point increase in our weighted average cost of capital would have caused
the Applications reporting unit to fail step one of our annual impairment test.
The timing and frequency of our goodwill impairment test is based on an ongoing assessment of
events and circumstances that would be an indicator of potential impairment of a reporting unit
below its carrying value. There are various assumptions and estimates underlying the determination
of an impairment loss, and estimates using different but, in each case, reasonable assumptions
could produce significantly different results and materially affect the determination of fair value
and/or goodwill impairment for each reporting unit. For example, if the expected recovery of the
economy is delayed significantly beyond what we have anticipated in our forecasts, it could cause
the fair value of our Applications reporting unit to fall below its respective carrying value. We
believe that the assumptions and estimates utilized were appropriate based on the information
available to management. The timing and recognition of impairment losses by us in the future, if
any, may be highly dependent upon our estimates and assumptions.
Share-Based Compensation
We account for share-based compensation using the fair value recognition provisions as
required in the accounting literature. We estimate the fair value of options granted using the
Black-Scholes option valuation model. We estimate the volatility of our common stock at the date
of grant based on a combination of the implied volatility of publicly traded options on our common
stock and our historical volatility rate. Our decision to use implied volatility was based upon
the availability of actively traded options on our common stock and our assessment that implied
volatility is more representative of future stock price trends than historical volatility.
30
We
estimate the expected term of options granted based on historical exercise patterns. The dividend
yield assumption is based on historical dividend payouts. The risk-free interest rate assumption
is based on observed interest rates appropriate for the term of our employee options. We use
historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures and record share-based compensation
expense only for those awards that are expected to vest. For options granted, we amortize the fair
value on a straight-line basis. All options are amortized over the requisite service periods of the
awards, which are generally the vesting periods. If factors change we may decide to use different
assumptions under the Black-Scholes option valuation model in the future, which could materially
affect our share-based compensation expense, net income and earnings per share.
Income Taxes
We use the asset and liability approach to account for income taxes. This methodology
recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of
temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax base of assets and liabilities and
operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. We then record a valuation allowance to reduce
deferred tax assets to an amount that more likely than not will be realized. We consider future
taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for
the valuation allowance, which requires the use of estimates. If we determine during any period
that we could realize a larger net deferred tax asset than the recorded amount, we would
adjust the deferred tax asset to increase income for the period or reduce goodwill if such deferred
tax asset relates to an acquisition. Conversely, if we determine that we would be unable to
realize a portion of our recorded deferred tax asset, we would adjust the deferred tax asset to
record a charge to income. To the extent an adjustment in our deferred tax assets relates to a
business combination the adjustment is recorded either in income from continuing operations in the
period of the combination or directly in contributed capital, depending on the circumstances.
Although we believe that our estimates are reasonable, there is no assurance that our valuation
allowance will not need to be increased to cover additional deferred tax assets that may not be
realizable, and such an increase could have a material adverse impact on our income tax provision
and results of operations in the period in which such determination is made. In addition, the
calculation of tax liabilities also involves significant judgment in estimating the impact of
uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws. Resolution of these uncertainties in a manner
inconsistent with managements expectations could also have a material impact on our income tax
provision and consolidated results of operations in the period in which such determination is made.
Contingencies and Litigation
We are subject to various proceedings, lawsuits and claims relating to products and services,
technology, labor, shareholder and other matters. We are required to assess the likelihood of any
adverse outcomes and the potential range of probable losses in these matters. If the potential loss
is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, we accrue a liability for the
estimated loss. If the potential loss is considered less than probable or the amount cannot be
reasonably estimated, disclosure of the matter is considered. The amount of loss accrual or
disclosure, if any, is determined after analysis of each matter, and is subject to adjustment if
warranted by new developments or revised strategies. Due to uncertainties related to these matters,
accruals or disclosures are based on the best information available at the time. Significant
judgment is required in both the assessment of likelihood and in the determination of a range of
potential losses. Revisions in the estimates of the potential liabilities could have a material
impact on our consolidated financial position or consolidated results of operations.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market Risk Disclosures
We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates, equity market prices, and
foreign currency exchange rates. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or
trading purposes.
Interest Rate Risk
We maintain an investment portfolio consisting mainly of income securities with an average
maturity of three years or less. These available-for-sale securities are subject to interest rate
risk and will fall in value if market interest rates increase. We have the ability to hold our
fixed income investments until maturity, and therefore we would not expect our operating results or
cash flows to be affected to any significant degree by the effect of a sudden change in market
interest rates on our securities portfolio. The following table presents the principal amounts and
related weighted-average yields for our investments with interest rate risk at March 31, 2011 and
September 30, 2010:
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Cost Basis |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Cost Basis |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
258,294 |
|
|
$ |
258,294 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
% |
|
$ |
146,199 |
|
|
$ |
146,199 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
% |
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,554 |
|
|
|
68,615 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
258,294 |
|
|
$ |
258,294 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
% |
|
$ |
214,753 |
|
|
$ |
214,814 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In May 2008, we issued $275 million of Senior Notes to a group of institutional investors
in a private placement. In July 2010 we issued an additional $245 million of Senior Notes to a
group of institutional investors in a private placement. The fair value of our Senior Notes may
increase or decrease due to various factors, including fluctuations in market interest rates and
fluctuations in general economic conditions. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Capital Resources and Liquidity, above, for additional
information on the Senior Notes. The following table presents the principal amounts, carrying
amounts, and fair values for our Senior Notes at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Amounts |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Amounts |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
$275 million Senior
Notes |
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
|
$ |
305,102 |
|
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
|
$ |
315,019 |
|
$245 million Senior
Notes |
|
$ |
245,000 |
|
|
$ |
245,000 |
|
|
$ |
252,829 |
|
|
$ |
245,000 |
|
|
$ |
245,000 |
|
|
$ |
258,727 |
|
We have interest rate risk with respect to our unsecured revolving line of credit.
Interest on amounts borrowed under the line of credit is based on (i) a base rate, which is the
greater of (a) the prime rate and (b) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50% or (ii) LIBOR plus an
applicable margin. The margin on LIBOR borrowings ranges from 0.30% to 0.55% and is determined
based on our consolidated leverage ratio. A change in interest rates on this variable rate debt
impacts the interest incurred and cash flows, but does not impact the fair value of the instrument.
As of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010 we had no outstanding borrowings on this facility.
Forward Foreign Currency Contracts
We maintain a program to manage our foreign currency exchange rate risk on existing foreign
currency receivable and cash balances by entering into forward contracts to sell or buy foreign
currency. At period end, foreign-denominated receivables and cash balances held by our U.S.
reporting entities are remeasured into the U.S. dollar functional currency at current market rates.
The change in value from this remeasurement is then reported as a foreign exchange gain or loss
for that period in our accompanying consolidated statements of income and the resulting gain or
loss on the forward contract mitigates the exchange rate risk of the associated assets. All of our
forward foreign currency contracts have maturity periods of less than three months. Such derivative
financial instruments are subject to market risk.
The following table summarizes our outstanding forward foreign currency contracts, by currency
at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010:
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
Contract Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Sell foreign currency: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian dollar (CAD) |
|
CAD 1,200 |
|
$ |
1,236 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Euro (EUR) |
|
EUR 5,390 |
|
|
7,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buy foreign currency: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
British pound (GBP) |
|
GBP3,243 |
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Contract Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Sell foreign currency: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian dollar (CAD) |
|
CAD 1,300 |
|
$ |
1,258 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Euro (EUR) |
|
EUR 5,460 |
|
$ |
7,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buy foreign currency: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
British pound (GBP) |
|
GBP3,672 |
|
$ |
5,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
The forward foreign currency contracts were all entered into on March 31, 2011 and
September 30, 2010, respectively; therefore, the fair value was $0 on each of those dates.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of FICOs
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness
of the design and operation of FICOs disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule
13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end
of the period covered by this quarterly report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that FICOs disclosure controls and procedures
are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by FICO in reports that it files
or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No change in FICOs internal control over financial reporting was identified in connection
with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the period
covered by this quarterly report and that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On October 11, 2006, we filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of
Minnesota captioned Fair Isaac Corporation and myFICO Consumer Services Inc. v. Equifax Inc.,
Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., TransUnion LLC,
VantageScore Solutions LLC, and Does I through X. The lawsuit related in part to the development,
marketing, and distribution of VantageScore, a credit score product developed by VantageScore
Solutions LLC, which is jointly owned by the
33
three national credit reporting companies. We alleged in the lawsuit violations of antitrust laws,
unfair competitive practices and false advertising, trademark infringement, and breach of contract.
We sought injunctive relief and compensatory damages. On June 6, 2008, we entered into a
settlement agreement with Equifax Inc. and Equifax Information Services LLC, and on June 13, 2008,
Equifax Inc. and Equifax Information Services LLC were formally dismissed from this lawsuit. On
February 9, 2009, the Court granted our motions to strike counterclaims the remaining defendants
had attempted to bring against us in the case, allowing them to assert only a counterclaim for
trademark cancellation. On July 24, 2009, the Court issued a summary judgment order, which limited
the claims to be tried. The Court dismissed our antitrust, contract, and certain false advertising
claims. The Court allowed our trademark infringement, unfair competition, and passing off claims
to proceed to trial. After a three-week trial on these claims, the jury ruled in the defendants
favor on November 20, 2009. We filed post-trial motions to address issues in the trial, and the
defendants filed post-trial motions seeking payment of certain attorneys fees and costs. On May
10, 2010, the Court issued a ruling denying our post-trial motions and substantially denying
defendants motions for attorneys fees and costs (other than an award to TransUnion LLC for
certain fees associated with our contract claims). On May 17, 2010, we entered into a settlement
agreement with TransUnion LLC pursuant to which, among many other terms, TransUnion LLC released
all claims to the fee award and was dismissed from the lawsuit. On August 20, 2010, we filed an
appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit appealing the results from the district
court, including the dismissal of our antitrust claims and certain rulings fundamental to our
trademark and false advertising claims. On November 4, 2010, the remaining defendants, Experian
Information Solutions, Inc. and VantageScore Solutions LLC, filed an appeal regarding the denial of
their motions for attorneys fees. Briefing on the appeals is
complete, and rulings are expected later in 2011.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Risks Related to Our Business
|
|
We have expanded the pursuit of our Decision Management strategy, and we may not be successful,
which could cause our growth prospects and results of operations to suffer. |
We have expanded the pursuit of our business objective to become a leader in helping
businesses automate and improve decisions across their enterprises, an approach that we commonly
refer to as Decision Management, or DM. Our DM strategy is designed to enable us to increase our
business by selling multiple products to clients, as well as to enable the development of custom
client solutions that may lead to opportunities to develop new proprietary scores or other new
proprietary products. The market may be unreceptive to this general DM business approach,
including being unreceptive to purchasing multiple products from us or unreceptive to our
customized solutions. If our DM strategy is not successful, we may not be able to grow our
business, growth may occur more slowly than we anticipate or our revenues and profits may decline.
|
|
We derive a substantial portion of our revenues from a small number of products and services, and
if the market does not continue to accept these products and services, our revenues will decline. |
We expect that revenues derived from our scoring solutions,
account management solutions, fraud solutions, originations and collections and recovery solutions
will continue to account for a substantial portion of our total revenues for the foreseeable
future. Our revenues will decline if the market does not continue to accept these products and
services. Factors that might affect the market acceptance of these products and services include
the following:
|
|
|
changes in the business analytics industry; |
|
|
|
|
changes in technology; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to obtain or use key data for our products; |
|
|
|
|
saturation or contraction of market demand; |
|
|
|
|
loss of key customers; |
|
|
|
|
industry consolidation; |
|
|
|
|
failure to execute our selling approach; and |
|
|
|
|
inability to successfully sell our products in new vertical markets. |
|
|
If we are unable to access new markets or develop new distribution channels, our business and
growth prospects could suffer. |
We expect that part of the growth that we seek to achieve through our DM strategy will be
derived from the sale of DM products and service solutions in industries and markets we do not
currently serve. We also expect to grow our business by delivering our DM solutions through
additional distribution channels. If we fail to penetrate these industries and markets to the
degree we anticipate
34
utilizing our DM strategy, or if we fail to develop additional distribution channels, we may not be
able to grow our business, growth may occur more slowly than we anticipate or our revenues and
profits may decline.
If we are unable to develop successful new products or if we experience defects, failures and
delays associated with the introduction of new products, our business could suffer serious harm.
Our growth and the success of our DM strategy depend upon our ability to develop and sell new
products or suites of products. If we are unable to develop new products, or if we are not
successful in introducing new products, we may not be able to grow our business, or growth may
occur more slowly than we anticipate. In addition, significant undetected errors or delays in new
products or new versions of products may affect market acceptance of our products and could harm
our business, financial condition or results of operations. In the past, we have experienced
delays while developing and introducing new products and product enhancements, primarily due to
difficulties developing models, acquiring data and adapting to particular operating environments.
We have also experienced errors or bugs in our software products, despite testing prior to
release of the products. Software errors in our products could affect the ability of our products
to work with other hardware or software products, could delay the development or release of new
products or new versions of products and could adversely affect market acceptance of our products.
Errors or defects in our products that are significant, or are perceived to be significant, could
result in rejection of our products, damage to our reputation, loss of revenues, diversion of
development resources, an increase in product liability claims, and increases in service and
support costs and warranty claims.
We rely on relatively few customers, as well as our contracts with the three major credit
reporting agencies, for a significant portion of our revenues and profits. Certain of our large
customers have been negatively impacted by the recent financial crisis. If these customers
continue to be negatively impacted, or if the terms of these relationships otherwise change, our
revenues and operating results could decline.
Most of our customers are relatively large enterprises, such as banks, credit card processors,
insurance companies, healthcare firms and retailers. As a result, many of our customers and
potential customers are significantly larger than we are and may have sufficient bargaining power
to demand reduced prices and favorable nonstandard terms.
In addition, since mid-2007, global financial markets have suffered substantial stress,
volatility, illiquidity and disruption. These forces reached unprecedented levels in the fall of
2008, resulting in the bankruptcy or acquisition of, or government assistance to, several major
domestic and international financial institutions which are customers of our company. The
potential for increased and continuing economic disruption presents considerable risks to our
business, including potential bankruptcies or credit deterioration of financial institutions with
which we have substantial relationships. Further deterioration or a continuation of the market
conditions experienced since the fall of 2008 is likely to lead to a continued decline in the
volume of transactions that we execute for our customers.
We also derive a substantial portion of our revenues and operating income from our contracts
with the three major credit reporting agencies, TransUnion, Equifax and Experian, and other parties
that distribute our products to certain markets. We are also currently involved in litigation with
Experian arising from its development and marketing of credit scoring products competitive with our
products. We have asserted various claims, including trademark infringement, unfair competition,
and antitrust violations against Experian and the joint venture entity, VantageScore, LLC, that
Experian formed with the other major credit reporting agencies. This litigation could have a
material adverse effect on our relationship with one or more of the major credit reporting
agencies, or with major customers.
The loss of or a significant change in a relationship with a major customer, the loss of or a
significant change in a relationship with one of the major credit reporting agencies with respect
to their distribution of our products or with respect to our myFICO® offerings, the loss
of or a significant change in a relationship with a significant third-party distributor or the
delay of significant revenues from these sources, could have a material adverse effect on our
revenues and results of operations.
We rely on relationships with third parties for marketing, distribution and certain services. If
we experience difficulties in these relationships, our future revenues may be adversely affected.
Most of our products rely on distributors, and we intend to continue to market and distribute
our products through existing and future distributor relationships. Our Scores segment relies on,
among others, TransUnion, Equifax and Experian. Failure of our existing and future distributors to
generate significant revenues, demands by such distributors to change the terms on which they offer
our products or our failure to establish additional distribution or sales and marketing alliances
could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
In addition, certain of our distributors presently compete with us and may
35
compete with us in the future either by developing competitive products themselves or by
distributing competitive offerings. For example, TransUnion, Equifax and Experian have developed a
credit scoring product to compete directly with our products and are collectively attempting to
sell the product. Competition from distributors or other sales and marketing partners could
significantly harm sales of our products and services.
If we do not engage in acquisition activity, we may be unable to increase our revenues at
comparable market growth rates.
Our past revenue growth has been augmented by numerous acquisitions, and we anticipate that
acquisitions may be an important part of our future revenue growth. We may be unable to increase
our revenues if we do not make acquisitions of similar size and at a comparable rate as in the
past.
If we engage in acquisitions, significant investments in new businesses, or divestitures of
existing businesses, we will incur a variety of risks, any of which may adversely affect our
business.
We have made in the past, and may make in the future, acquisitions of, or significant
investments in, businesses that offer complementary products, services and technologies. Any
acquisitions or investments will be accompanied by the risks commonly encountered in acquisitions
of businesses, which may include:
|
|
|
failure to achieve the financial and strategic goals for the acquired and combined
business; |
|
|
|
|
overpayment for the acquired companies or assets; |
|
|
|
|
difficulty assimilating the operations and personnel of the acquired businesses; |
|
|
|
|
product liability and other exposure associated with acquired businesses or the sale of
their products; |
|
|
|
|
disruption of our ongoing business; |
|
|
|
|
dilution of our existing stockholders and earnings per share; |
|
|
|
|
unanticipated liabilities, legal risks and costs; |
|
|
|
|
retention of key personnel; |
|
|
|
|
distraction of management from our ongoing business; and |
|
|
|
|
impairment of relationships with employees and customers as a result of integration of
new management personnel. |
We have also divested ourselves of businesses in the past and may do so again in the future.
Any divestitures will be accompanied by the risks commonly encountered in the sale of businesses,
which may include:
|
|
|
disruption of our ongoing business; |
|
|
|
|
reductions of our revenues or earnings per share; |
|
|
|
|
unanticipated liabilities, legal risks and costs; |
|
|
|
|
the potential loss of key personnel; |
|
|
|
|
distraction of management from our ongoing business; and |
|
|
|
|
impairment of relationships with employees and customers as a result of migrating a
business to new owners. |
These risks could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations,
particularly if they occur in the context of a significant acquisition. Acquisitions of businesses
having a significant presence outside the U.S. will increase our exposure to the risks of
conducting operations in international markets.
Our reengineering initiative may not be successful which could cause our growth prospects and
profitability to suffer.
As part of our management approach, we implemented an ongoing reengineering initiative
designed to grow revenues through strategic resource allocation and improve profitability through
cost reductions. Periodically, implementation of our reengineering initiative may reduce our
revenues as a result of our exit from non-strategic product lines. Our reengineering initiative
may not be successful as a result of our failure to reduce expenses at the anticipated level, our
inability to exit all non-strategic product lines included in the initiative, or a lower, or no,
positive impact on revenues from strategic resource allocation. If our reengineering initiative is
not successful, our revenues, results of operations and business may suffer.
The occurrence of certain negative events may cause fluctuations in our stock price.
The market price of our common stock may be volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations
due to a number of factors, including variations in our revenues and operating results. We believe
that you should not rely on period-to-period comparisons of financial results as an indication of
future performance. Because many of our operating expenses are fixed and will not be affected by
36
short-term fluctuations in revenues, short-term fluctuations in revenues may significantly impact
operating results. Additional factors that may cause our stock price to fluctuate include the
following:
|
|
|
variability in demand from our existing customers; |
|
|
|
|
failure to meet the expectations of market analysts; |
|
|
|
|
changes in recommendations by market analysts; |
|
|
|
|
the lengthy and variable sales cycle of many products, combined with the relatively large
size of orders for our products, increases the likelihood of short-term fluctuation in
revenues; |
|
|
|
|
consumer dissatisfaction with, or problems caused by, the performance of our products; |
|
|
|
|
the timing of new product announcements and introductions in comparison with our
competitors; |
|
|
|
|
the level of our operating expenses; |
|
|
|
|
changes in competitive and other conditions in the consumer credit, banking and insurance
industries; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in domestic and international economic conditions, including a continuation
of the substantial disruption currently being experienced by the global financial markets; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to complete large installations on schedule and within budget; |
|
|
|
|
acquisition-related expenses and charges; and |
|
|
|
|
timing of orders for and deliveries of software systems. |
In addition, the financial markets have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations
that have particularly affected the stock prices of many technology companies and financial
services companies, and these fluctuations sometimes have been unrelated to the operating
performance of these companies. Broad market fluctuations, as well as industry-specific and
general economic conditions may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Due to ongoing uncertainty in economic conditions and weakness in financial credit markets,
the fair value of our businesses has declined. If difficult market and economic conditions
continue over a sustained period, we may experience a further decline in the fair value of one or
more of our businesses from fiscal 2010 year-end levels. Such further declines in fair value may
require us to record an impairment charge related to goodwill, which could adversely affect our
results of operations, stock price and business.
Our products have long and variable sales cycles. If we do not accurately predict these cycles,
we may not forecast our financial results accurately, and our stock price could be adversely
affected.
We experience difficulty in forecasting our revenues accurately because the length of our
sales cycles makes it difficult for us to predict the quarter in which sales will occur. In
addition, our selling approach is complex as we look to sell multiple products and services across
our customers organizations. This makes forecasting of revenues in any given period more
difficult. As a result of our sales approach and lengthening sales cycles, revenues and operating
results may vary significantly from period to period. For example, the sales cycle for licensing
our products typically ranges from 60 days to 18 months. Customers are often cautious in making
decisions to acquire our products, because purchasing our products typically involves a significant
commitment of capital, and may involve shifts by the customer to a new software and/or hardware
platform or changes in the customers operational procedures. This may cause customers,
particularly those experiencing financial stress, to make purchasing decisions more cautiously.
Delays in completing sales can arise while customers complete their internal procedures to approve
large capital expenditures and test and accept our applications. Consequently, we face difficulty
predicting the quarter in which sales to expected customers will occur and experience fluctuations
in our revenues and operating results. If we are unable to accurately forecast our revenues, our
stock price could be adversely affected.
We typically have revenue-generating transactions concentrated in the final weeks of a quarter,
which may prevent accurate forecasting of our financial results and cause our stock price to
decline.
Large portions of our software license agreements are consummated in the weeks immediately
preceding quarter end. Before these agreements are consummated, we create and rely on forecasted
revenues for planning, modeling and earnings guidance. Forecasts, however, are only estimates and
actual results may vary for a particular quarter or longer periods of time. Consequently,
significant discrepancies between actual and forecasted results could limit our ability to plan,
budget or provide accurate guidance, which could adversely affect our stock price. Any
publicly-stated revenue or earnings projections are subject to this risk.
The failure to recruit and retain additional qualified personnel could hinder our ability to
successfully manage our business.
Our DM strategy and our future success will depend in large part on our ability to attract and
retain experienced sales, consulting, research and development, marketing, technical support and
management personnel. The complexity of our products requires highly
37
trained customer service and technical support personnel to assist customers with product
installation and deployment. The labor market for these individuals is very competitive due to the
limited number of people available with the necessary technical skills and understanding and may
become more competitive with general market and economic improvement. We cannot be certain that
our compensation strategies will be perceived as competitive by current or prospective employees.
This could impair our ability to recruit and retain personnel. We have experienced difficulty in
recruiting qualified personnel, especially technical, sales and consulting personnel, and we may
need additional staff to support new customers and/or increased customer needs. We may also
recruit skilled technical professionals from other countries to work in the United States.
Limitations imposed by immigration laws in the United States and abroad and the availability of
visas in the countries where we do business could hinder our ability to attract necessary qualified
personnel and harm our business and future operating results. There is a risk that even if we
invest significant resources in attempting to attract, train and retain qualified personnel, we
will not succeed in our efforts, and our business could be harmed. The failure of the value of our
stock to appreciate may adversely affect our ability to use equity and equity based incentive plans
to attract and retain personnel, and may require us to use alternative and more expensive forms of
compensation for this purpose.
The failure to obtain certain forms of model construction data from our customers or others could
harm our business.
We must develop or obtain a reliable source of sufficient amounts of current and statistically
relevant data to analyze transactions and update our products. In most cases, these data must be
periodically updated and refreshed to enable our products to continue to work effectively in a
changing environment. We do not own or control much of the data that we require, most of which is
collected privately and maintained in proprietary databases. Customers and key business alliances
provide us with the data we require to analyze transactions, report results and build new models.
Our DM strategy depends in part upon our ability to access new forms of data to develop custom and
proprietary analytic tools. If we fail to maintain sufficient data sourcing relationships with our
customers and business alliances, or if they decline to provide such data due to legal privacy
concerns, competition concerns, prohibitions or a lack of permission from their customers, we could
lose access to required data and our products, and the development of new products might become
less effective. Third parties have asserted copyright interests in these data, and these
assertions, if successful, could prevent us from using these data. Any interruption of our supply
of data could seriously harm our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We will continue to rely upon proprietary technology rights, and if we are unable to protect them,
our business could be harmed.
Our success depends, in part, upon our proprietary technology and other intellectual property
rights. To date, we have relied primarily on a combination of copyright, patent, trade secret, and
trademark laws, and nondisclosure and other contractual restrictions on copying and distribution to
protect our proprietary technology. This protection of our proprietary technology is limited, and
our proprietary technology could be used by others without our consent. In addition, patents may
not be issued with respect to our pending or future patent applications, and our patents may not be
upheld as valid or may not prevent the development of competitive products. Any disclosure, loss,
invalidity of, or failure to protect our intellectual property could negatively impact our
competitive position, and ultimately, our business. There can be no assurance that our protection
of our intellectual property rights in the United States or abroad will be adequate or that others,
including our competitors, will not use our proprietary technology without our consent.
Furthermore, litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect
our trade secrets, or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others.
Such litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could harm our
business, financial condition or results of operations.
Some of our technologies were developed under research projects conducted under agreements
with various U.S. government agencies or subcontractors. Although we have commercial rights to
these technologies, the U.S. government typically retains ownership of intellectual property rights
and licenses in the technologies developed by us under these contracts, and in some cases can
terminate our rights in these technologies if we fail to commercialize them on a timely basis.
Under these contracts with the U.S. government, the results of research may be made public by the
government, limiting our competitive advantage with respect to future products based on our
research.
If we are subject to infringement claims, it could harm our business.
We expect that products in the industry segments in which we compete, including software
products, will increasingly be subject to claims of patent and other intellectual property
infringement as the number of products and competitors in our industry segments grow. We may need
to defend claims that our products infringe intellectual property rights, and as a result we may:
|
|
|
incur significant defense costs or substantial damages; |
|
|
|
|
be required to cease the use or sale of infringing products; |
|
|
|
|
expend significant resources to develop or license a substitute non-infringing
technology;
|
38
|
|
|
discontinue the use of some technology; or |
|
|
|
|
be required to obtain a license under the intellectual property rights of the third party
claiming infringement, which license may not be available or might require substantial
royalties or license fees that would reduce our margins. |
Breaches of security, or the perception that e-commerce is not secure, could harm our business.
Our business requires the appropriate and secure utilization of consumer and other sensitive
information. Internet-based electronic commerce requires the secure transmission of confidential
information over public networks, and several of our products are accessed through the Internet,
including our consumer services accessible through the www.myfico.com website. Security breaches
in connection with the delivery of our products and services, including products and services
utilizing the Internet, or well-publicized security breaches, and the trend toward broad consumer
and general public notification of such incidents, could significantly harm our business, financial
condition or results of operations. We cannot be certain that advances in criminal capabilities,
discovery of new vulnerabilities, attempts to exploit vulnerabilities in our systems, data thefts,
physical system or network break-ins or inappropriate access, or other developments will not
compromise or breach the technology protecting the networks that access our net-sourced products,
consumer services and proprietary database information.
Protection from system interruptions is important to our business. If we experience a sustained
interruption of our telecommunication systems, it could harm our business.
Systems or network interruptions could delay and disrupt our ability to develop, deliver or
maintain our products and services, causing harm to our business and reputation and resulting in
loss of customers or revenue. These interruptions can include fires, floods, earthquakes, power
losses, equipment failures and other events beyond our control.
Risks Related to Our Industry
Our ability to increase our revenues will depend to some extent upon introducing new products and
services. If the marketplace does not accept these new products and services, our revenues may
decline.
We have a significant share of the available market in portions of our Scores segment and for
certain services in our Applications segment, specifically, the markets for account management
services at credit card processors and credit card fraud detection software. To increase our
revenues, we must enhance and improve existing products and continue to introduce new products and
new versions of existing products that keep pace with technological developments, satisfy
increasingly sophisticated customer requirements and achieve market acceptance. We believe much of
the future growth of our business and the success of our DM strategy will rest on our ability to
continue to expand into newer markets for our products and services. Such areas are relatively new
to our product development and sales and marketing personnel. Products that we plan to market in
the future are in various stages of development. We cannot assure you that the marketplace will
accept these products. If our current or potential customers are not willing to switch to or adopt
our new products and services, either as a result of the quality of these products and services or
due to other factors, such as economic conditions, our revenues will decrease.
If we fail to keep up with rapidly changing technologies, our products could become less
competitive or obsolete.
In our markets, technology changes rapidly, and there are continuous improvements in computer
hardware, network operating systems, programming tools, programming languages, operating systems,
database technology and the use of the Internet. If we fail to enhance our current products and
develop new products in response to changes in technology or industry standards, or if we fail to
bring product enhancements or new product developments to market quickly enough, our products could
rapidly become less competitive or obsolete. For example, the rapid growth of the Internet
environment creates new opportunities, risks and uncertainties for businesses, such as ours, which
develop software that must also be designed to operate in Internet, intranet and other online
environments. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to:
|
|
|
innovate by internally developing new and competitive technologies; |
|
|
|
|
use leading third-party technologies effectively; |
|
|
|
|
continue to develop our technical expertise; |
|
|
|
|
anticipate and effectively respond to changing customer needs; |
|
|
|
|
initiate new product introductions in a way that minimizes the impact of customers
delaying purchases of existing products in anticipation of new product releases; and |
|
|
|
|
influence and respond to emerging industry standards and other technological changes. |
39
If our competitors introduce new products and pricing strategies, it could decrease our product
sales and market share, or could pressure us to reduce our product prices in a manner that reduces
our margins.
We may not be able to compete successfully against our competitors, and this inability could
impair our capacity to sell our products. The market for business analytics is new, rapidly
evolving and highly competitive, and we expect competition in this market to persist and intensify.
Our regional and global competitors vary in size and in the scope of the products and services
they offer, and include:
|
|
|
in-house analytic and systems developers; |
|
|
|
|
scoring model builders; |
|
|
|
|
enterprise resource planning (ERP) and customer relationship management (CRM) packaged
solutions providers; |
|
|
|
|
business intelligence solutions providers; |
|
|
|
|
credit report and credit score providers; |
|
|
|
|
business process management solution providers; |
|
|
|
|
process modeling tools providers; |
|
|
|
|
automated application processing services providers; |
|
|
|
|
data vendors; |
|
|
|
|
neural network developers and artificial intelligence system builders; |
|
|
|
|
third-party professional services and consulting organizations; |
|
|
|
|
account/workflow management software providers; and |
|
|
|
|
software tools companies supplying modeling, rules, or analytic development tools. |
We expect to experience additional competition from other established and emerging companies,
as well as from other technologies. For example, certain of our fraud solutions products compete
against other methods of preventing credit card fraud, such as credit cards that contain the
cardholders photograph, smart cards, cardholder verification and authentication solutions and
other card authorization techniques. Many of our anticipated competitors have greater financial,
technical, marketing, professional services and other resources than we do, and industry
consolidation is creating even larger competitors in many of our markets. As a result, our
competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in
customer requirements. They may also be able to devote greater resources than we can to develop,
promote and sell their products. Many of these companies have extensive customer relationships,
including relationships with many of our current and potential customers. Furthermore, new
competitors or alliances among competitors may emerge and rapidly gain significant market share.
For example, TransUnion, Equifax and Experian have formed an alliance that has developed a credit
scoring product competitive with our products. If we are unable to respond as quickly or
effectively to changes in customer requirements as our competition, our ability to expand our
business and sell our products will be negatively affected.
Our competitors may be able to sell products competitive to ours at lower prices individually
or as part of integrated suites of several related products. This ability may cause our customers
to purchase products that directly compete with our products from our competitors. Price
reductions by our competitors could negatively impact our margins, and could also harm our ability
to obtain new long-term contracts and renewals of existing long-term contracts on favorable terms.
Legislation that is enacted by the U.S. Congress, the states, Canadian provinces, and other
countries, and government regulations that apply to us or to our customers may expose us to
liability, affect our ability to compete in certain markets, limit the profitability of or demand
for our products, or render our products obsolete. If these laws and regulations require us to
change our current products and services, it could adversely affect our business and results of
operations.
Legislation and governmental regulation affect how our business is conducted and, in some
cases, subject us to the possibility of future lawsuits arising from our products and services.
Globally, legislation and governmental regulation also influence our current and prospective
customers activities, as well as their expectations and needs in relation to our products and
services. Both our core businesses and our newer initiatives are affected globally by federal,
regional, provincial, state and other jurisdictional regulations, including those in the following
significant regulatory areas:
|
|
|
Use of data by creditors and consumer reporting agencies. Examples in the U.S. include
the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act
(FACTA), which amends FCRA, and certain proposed regulations and studies mandated by
FACTA, under consideration; |
|
|
|
|
Laws and regulations that limit the use of credit scoring models such as state mortgage
trigger laws, state inquiries laws, state insurance restrictions on the use of credit
based insurance scores, and the Consumer Credit Directive in the European Union. |
40
|
|
|
Fair lending laws, such as the Truth In Lending Act (TILA) and Regulation Z, and the
Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) and Regulation B. |
|
|
|
|
Privacy and security laws and regulations that limit the use and disclosure of personally
identifiable information or require security procedures, including but not limited to the
provisions of the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999, also known as the Gramm
Leach Bliley Act (GLBA); FACTA; the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of
1996 (HIPAA); the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools
Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA Patriot Act); identity
theft, file freezing, security breach notification and similar state privacy laws; |
|
|
|
|
Extension of credit to consumers through the Electronic Fund Transfers Act, as well as
nongovernmental VISA and MasterCard electronic payment standards; |
|
|
|
|
Regulations applicable to secondary market participants such as Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac that could have an impact on our products; |
|
|
|
|
Insurance laws and regulations applicable to our insurance clients and their use of our
insurance products and services; |
|
|
|
|
The application or extension of consumer protection laws, including, laws governing the
use of the Internet and telemarketing, advertising, endorsements and testimonials and credit
repair; |
|
|
|
|
Laws and regulations applicable to operations in other countries, for example, the
European Unions Privacy Directive and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; |
|
|
|
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) requirements to maintain and verify internal process controls,
including controls for material event awareness and notification; |
|
|
|
|
The implementation of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 by federal
regulators to manage the financial crisis in the United States; |
|
|
|
|
Financial regulatory reform stemming from the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act; |
|
|
|
|
Laws and regulations regarding export controls as they apply to FICO products delivered
in non-US countries. |
In making credit evaluations of consumers, or in performing fraud screening or user
authentication, our customers are subject to requirements of multiple jurisdictions, which may
impose onerous and contradictory requirements. Privacy legislation such as GLBA or the European
Unions Privacy Directive may also affect the nature and extent of the products or services that we
can provide to customers, as well as our ability to collect, monitor and disseminate information
subject to privacy protection. In addition to existing regulation, changes in legislative,
judicial, regulatory or consumer environments could harm our business, financial condition or
results of operations. These regulations and amendments to them could affect the demand for or
profitability of some of our products, including scoring and consumer products. New regulations
pertaining to financial institutions could cause them to pursue new strategies, reducing the demand
for our products.
In response to recent market disruptions, legislators and financial regulators implemented a
number of mechanisms designed to add stability to the financial markets, including the provision of
direct and indirect assistance to distressed financial institutions, assistance by the banking
authorities in arranging acquisitions of weakened banks and broker-dealers, and implementation of
programs by the Federal Reserve to provide liquidity to the commercial paper markets. The overall
effects of these and other legislative and regulatory efforts on the financial markets are
uncertain, and they may not have the intended stabilization effects. Should these or other
legislative or regulatory initiatives fail to stabilize and add liquidity to the financial markets,
our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially and
adversely affected. Whether or not legislative or regulatory initiatives or other efforts designed
to address recent economic conditions successfully stabilize and add liquidity to the financial
markets, we may need to modify our strategies, businesses or operations, and we may incur
additional costs in order to compete in a changed business environment.
Our revenues depend, to a great extent, upon conditions in the banking (including consumer credit)
and insurance industries. If our clients industries continue to experience a downturn, it will
likely harm our business, financial condition or results of operations.
During fiscal 2010, 76% of our revenues were derived from sales of products and services to
the banking and insurance industries. Since mid-2007, global credit and other financial markets
have suffered substantial stress, volatility, illiquidity and disruption. These forces reached
unprecedented levels in the fall of 2008, resulting in the bankruptcy or acquisition of, or
government assistance to, several major domestic and international financial institutions. The
recent market developments and the potential for increased and continuing disruptions present
considerable risks to our businesses and operations. These risks include potential bankruptcies or
credit deterioration of financial institutions, many of which are our customers. Further
deterioration or a continuation of recent market conditions is likely to lead to a continued
decline in the revenue we receive from financial and other institutions.
41
While the rate of account growth in the U.S. bankcard industry has been slowing and many of
our large institutional customers have consolidated in recent years, we have generated most of our
revenue growth from our bankcard-related scoring and account management businesses by selling and
cross-selling our products and services to large banks and other credit issuers. As the banking
industry continues to experience contraction in the number of participating institutions, we may
have fewer opportunities for revenue growth due to reduced or changing demand for our products and
services that support customer acquisition programs of our customers. In addition, industry
contraction could affect the base of recurring revenues derived from contracts in which we are paid
on a per-transaction basis as formerly separate customers combine their operations under one
contract. There can be no assurance that we will be able to prevent future revenue contraction or
effectively promote future revenue growth in our businesses.
While we are attempting to expand our sales of consumer credit, banking and insurance products
and services into international markets, the risks are greater as these markets are also
experiencing substantial disruption and we are less well-known in them.
Risk Related to External Conditions
Continuing material adverse developments in global economic conditions, or the occurrence of
certain other world events, could affect demand for our products and services and harm our
business.
Purchases of technology products and services and decisioning solutions are subject to adverse
economic conditions. When an economy is struggling, companies in many industries delay or reduce
technology purchases, and we experience softened demand for our decisioning solutions and other
products and services. Since mid-2007, global credit and other financial markets have suffered
substantial stress, volatility, illiquidity and disruption. These forces reached unprecedented
levels in the fall of 2008, resulting in the bankruptcy or acquisition of, or government assistance
to, several major domestic and international financial institutions. The widespread economic
downturn has also negatively affected the businesses and purchasing decisions of companies in the
other industries we serve. These recent market developments and the potential for increased and
continuing disruptions present considerable risks to our businesses and operations. If global
economic conditions continue to experience stress and negative volatility, or if there is an
escalation in regional or global conflicts or terrorism, we will likely experience reductions in
the number of available customers and in capital expenditures by our remaining customers, longer
sales cycles, deferral or delay of purchase commitments for our products and increased price
competition, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations and liquidity.
Whether or not legislative or regulatory initiatives or other efforts successfully stabilize
and add liquidity to the financial markets, we may need to modify our strategies, businesses or
operations, and we may incur additional costs in order to compete in a changed business
environment. Given the volatile nature of the current economic downturn and the uncertainties
underlying efforts to mitigate or reverse the downturn, we may not timely anticipate or manage
existing, new or additional risks, as well as contingencies or developments, which may include
regulatory developments and trends in new products and services. Our failure to do so could
materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and
prospects.
In operations outside the United States, we are subject to unique risks that may harm our
business, financial condition or results of operations.
A growing portion of our revenues is derived from international sales. During fiscal 2010,
35% of our revenues were derived from business outside the United States. As part of our growth
strategy, we plan to continue to pursue opportunities outside the United States, including
opportunities in countries with economic systems that are in early stages of development and that
may not mature sufficiently to result in growth for our business. Accordingly, our future
operating results could be negatively affected by a variety of factors arising out of international
commerce, some of which are beyond our control. These factors include:
|
|
|
general economic and political conditions in countries where we sell our products and
services; |
|
|
|
|
difficulty in staffing and efficiently managing our operations in multiple geographic
locations and in various countries; |
|
|
|
|
effects of a variety of foreign laws and regulations, including restrictions on access to
personal information; |
|
|
|
|
import and export licensing requirements; |
|
|
|
|
longer payment cycles; |
|
|
|
|
reduced protection for intellectual property rights; |
|
|
|
|
currency fluctuations; |
|
|
|
|
changes in tariffs and other trade barriers; and |
|
|
|
|
difficulties and delays in translating products and related documentation into foreign
languages. |
42
There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully address each of these
challenges in the near term. Additionally, some of our business will be conducted in currencies
other than the U.S. dollar. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are not currently
material to our cash flows, financial position or results of operations. However, an increase in
our foreign revenues could subject us to increased foreign currency transaction risks in the
future.
In addition to the risk of depending on international sales, we have risks incurred in having
research and development personnel located in various international locations. We currently have a
substantial portion of our product development staff in international locations, some of which have
political and developmental risks. If such risks materialize, our business could be damaged.
Our anti-takeover defenses could make it difficult for another company to acquire control of FICO,
thereby limiting the demand for our securities by certain types of purchasers or the price
investors are willing to pay for our stock.
Certain provisions of our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, could make a
merger, tender offer or proxy contest involving us difficult, even if such events would be
beneficial to the interests of our stockholders. These provisions include adopting a Shareholder
Rights Agreement, commonly known as a poison pill, and giving our board the ability to issue
preferred stock and determine the rights and designations of the preferred stock at any time
without stockholder approval. The rights of the holders of our common stock will be subject to,
and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any preferred stock that may be
issued in the future. The issuance of preferred stock, while providing flexibility in connection
with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could have the effect of making it more
difficult for a third party to acquire, or discouraging a third party from acquiring, a majority of
our outstanding voting stock. These factors and certain provisions of the Delaware General
Corporation Law may have the effect of deterring hostile takeovers or otherwise delaying or
preventing changes in control or changes in our management, including transactions in which our
stockholders might otherwise receive a premium over the fair market value of our common stock.
If we experience changes in tax laws or adverse outcomes resulting from examination of our income
tax returns, it could adversely affect our results of operations.
We are subject to federal and state income taxes in the United States and in certain foreign
jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income
taxes. Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by changes in tax laws, by our
ability to generate taxable income in foreign jurisdictions in order to utilize foreign tax losses,
and by the valuation of our deferred tax assets. In addition, we are subject to the examination of
our income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. We regularly
assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from such examinations to determine the
adequacy of our provision for income taxes. There can be no assurance that the outcomes from such
examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Dollar Value of |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
|
Shares that May |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Yet Be |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Announced |
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Plans or |
|
|
Under the Plans |
|
Period |
|
(2) |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
or Programs |
|
January 1, 2011 through January 31, 2011 |
|
|
73,582 |
|
|
$ |
25.62 |
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
$ |
172,750,841 |
|
February 1, 2011 through February 28, 2011 |
|
|
215,361 |
|
|
$ |
26.59 |
|
|
|
206,500 |
|
|
$ |
167,253,177 |
|
March 1, 2011 through March 31, 2011 |
|
|
357,600 |
|
|
$ |
27.89 |
|
|
|
357,600 |
|
|
$ |
157,280,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
646,543 |
|
|
$ |
27.20 |
|
|
|
629,100 |
|
|
$ |
157,280,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In June 2010, our Board of Directors approved a common stock repurchase program that
allows us to purchase shares of our common stock up to an aggregate cost of $250.0 million
in the open market or through negotiated transactions. The June 2010 program does not have
a fixed expiration date. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 17,443 shares delivered in satisfaction of the tax withholding obligations
resulting from the vesting of restricted |
43
|
|
|
|
|
stock units held by employees during the quarter ended March 31, 2011. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
3.1
|
|
Composite Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of Fair Isaac Corporation (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Form 10-Q filed on
February 8, 2010). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
By-laws of Fair Isaac Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys
10-Q filed on February 8, 2010). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of CEO. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of CFO. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of CEO. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of CFO. |
|
|
|
101
|
|
The following materials from Fair Isaac Corporations
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2011, formatted in Extensive Business Reporting Language
(XBRL), (i) condensed consolidated balance sheets, (ii)
condensed consolidated statements of income, (iii) condensed
consolidated statement of stockholders equity and
comprehensive income, (iv) condensed consolidated statements
of cash flows, and (v) the notes to the condensed
consolidated financial statements. |
44
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION
|
|
DATE: May 10, 2011 |
By |
/s/ MICHAEL J. PUNG
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Pung |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(for Registrant as duly authorized officer,
Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
45
EXHIBIT INDEX
To Fair Isaac Corporation Report On Form 10-Q
For The Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
3.1
|
|
Composite Restated Certificate of
Incorporation at Fair Isaac Corporation.
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
By-laws of Fair Isaac Corporation.
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of CEO.
|
|
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of CFO.
|
|
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of CEO.
|
|
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of CFO.
|
|
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
The following materials from Fair Isaac Corporations
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2011, formatted in Extensive Business
Reporting Language (XBRL), (i) condensed consolidated
balance sheets, (ii) condensed consolidated
statements of income, (iii) condensed consolidated
statement of stockholders equity and comprehensive
income, (iv) condensed consolidated statements of
cash flows, and (v) the notes to the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
Filed Electronically |
46
exv31w1
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Mark N. Greene, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fair Isaac Corporation; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and |
|
d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and |
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
May 10, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
|
|
MARK N. GREENE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark N. Greene |
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
exv31w2
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Michael J. Pung, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fair Isaac Corporation; |
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report; |
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report; |
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
|
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) |
|
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and |
|
d) |
|
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and |
|
b) |
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
May 10, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
|
|
MICHAEL J. PUNG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Pung |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
exv32w1
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this
periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Fair Isaac Corporation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 10, 2011 |
/s/ MARK N. GREENE |
|
Mark N. Greene
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
exv32w2
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this
periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Fair Isaac Corporation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 10, 2011 |
/s/ MICHAEL J. PUNG
|
|
|
Michael J. Pung |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|